Sullivan (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sullivan (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sullivan (IN)
5,406
Total Investors in Sullivan (IN)
1,944
Investor Owned SFR in Sullivan (IN)
1,502(27.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,759
SFR Owned
1,282
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
185
SFR Owned
234
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,502 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Sullivan County with 96.5% Ownership as Investors Claim 38% of Q4 Home Sales
Investors own 1,502 SFR properties in Sullivan County, representing 27.8% of the total market, with individual investors accounting for 85.4% of these holdings. In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 37.7% of all homes sold at a 7.9% discount to homeowners, while institutional investors remained on the sidelines.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,502 properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.4% share.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties (92.1%) are held free and clear with cash. The portfolio is intensely rental-focused, with 98.6% of properties classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid $175,207 in Q4, a 7.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
The landlord pricing advantage has been volatile, swinging from a 35.1% premium in Q2 to a 28.3% discount in Q3 before settling at a 7.9% discount in Q4. Since the 2020-2023 period, the average landlord acquisition price has surged by 36.9%.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 37.7% of all SFR properties sold in Sullivan County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 88.5% of all investor purchases. Their 23 acquisitions dwarfed the single property bought by an institutional investor.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors have a negligible 0.1% market share. In Q4 transactions, new mom-and-pop buyers paid over double what the single institutional buyer paid ($190,995 vs $90,170), and institutions were neutral, buying one home and selling one.
Ownership by Tier & Type
The provided data does not contain pricing information to compare individual and company buyers.
Companies become the majority owners (51.4%) in the 6-10 property tier, a clear crossover point from individual-dominated smaller portfolios. In the 101-1000 property tier, companies own 33 of the 34 homes (97.1%).
Geographic Distribution
The 47882 zip code leads Sullivan County with 491 investor-owned properties.
The highest investor concentration is in the 47865 zip code, where investors own 75.0% of all homes. This contrasts with the volume leader, 47882, which has a much lower 19.5% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.14x buy/sell ratio in Q4; only 5.6% of purchases came from other landlords.
For the full year 2025, landlords bought 7.64 properties for every one they sold. However, acquisition volume is slowing, with 123 buys in 2024 compared to 107 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investors were involved in 36.4% of all 99 Sullivan County home transactions in Q4 2025.
A massive price gap exists within the investor community: institutional buyers paid 52.8% less than new mom-and-pop landlords ($90,170 vs $190,995). Small landlords (3-5 properties) were most likely to buy from peers, with a 33.3% inter-landlord purchase rate.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,502 properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 85.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 27.8% of all single-family residential properties in Sullivan County, totaling 1,502 homes.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 1,282 properties (85.4%), compared to just 234 properties (15.6%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 1,759 of the 1,944 total landlords (90.5%) are individuals.

Investor portfolios in the region are built on a foundation of low leverage, with a remarkable 92.1% of properties (1,383) owned outright with cash versus just 7.9% (119) that are financed.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, as 1,481 of the 1,502 properties (98.6%) are operated as rentals, signaling a strong focus on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid $175,207 in Q4, a 7.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $175,207—a 7.9% discount that saved them $15,087 per property compared to the $190,294 paid by traditional homeowners.

This marks a return to a discount after a period of extreme volatility earlier in the year, which included paying a massive 35.1% premium in Q2 and securing a deep 28.3% discount in Q3.

The fluctuating price gap suggests that landlord purchasing in Sullivan County is highly opportunistic, capitalizing on specific deals rather than following a consistent market-wide pricing strategy.

Property values have appreciated significantly for investors. The average Q4 2025 acquisition price of $175,207 is 36.9% higher than the average price of $128,005 paid during the 2020-2023 period.

Comparing full-year data, the average landlord purchase price rose from $156,775 in 2024 to $191,413 in 2025, a 22.1% year-over-year increase.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 37.7% of all SFR properties sold in Sullivan County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 26 of the 69 homes sold, capturing a significant 37.7% share of the total market.

The engine of this activity is the small-scale investor, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 23 of those purchases, or 88.5% of all landlord acquisitions.

The market continues to attract new entrants, with 28 new single-property landlords making their first purchase in Q4, accounting for 69.2% of all investor-bought properties.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had a minimal impact on the acquisitions market, purchasing only a single property during the quarter.

This 23-to-1 purchase ratio between mom-and-pop and institutional investors underscores that market growth is a grassroots phenomenon, not a corporate one.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 96.5% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sullivan County is unequivocally dominated by small landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties controlling 96.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, alone owning 1,296 properties, which represents 84.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

Conversely, the institutional investor presence is virtually nonexistent, with the 1000+ property tier accounting for just a single home, or 0.1% of the market share.

The data dispels any notion of a corporate takeover, highlighting a highly fragmented market composed almost entirely of small-scale, local investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also hold a very small portion of the market, collectively owning just 3.4% of investor-owned properties, further cementing the dominance of the mom-and-pop segment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
The provided data does not contain pricing information to compare individual and company buyers.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges in ownership structure based on portfolio size: while individual investors are the foundation of the market, a corporate structure becomes the preferred vehicle for scaling.

Individuals overwhelmingly own smaller portfolios, accounting for 89.4% of single-property holdings and 83.8% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership happens decisively at the 6-10 property tier, where companies cross the threshold to become the majority owners with a 51.4% share of properties.

This trend accelerates in larger portfolios. In the 101-1000 property tier, company ownership is nearly absolute, controlling 33 of the 34 properties (97.1%).

This suggests that while the barrier to entry is low for individuals, growing a portfolio beyond five properties in Sullivan County often involves incorporation for liability, financing, or operational reasons.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47882 zip code leads Sullivan County with 491 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Sullivan County is geographically concentrated, with the 47882 zip code serving as the hub for total investor holdings with 491 properties.

However, the highest market penetration occurs elsewhere. The 47865 zip code has an extraordinary investor ownership rate of 75.0%, making it the most landlord-dominated area by percentage.

This divergence highlights two distinct investment strategies: a volume-based approach in larger residential areas like 47882 (19.5% rate) and a high-concentration approach in smaller zip codes like 47865 and 47855 (62.1% rate).

The 47850 zip code is a notable market, exhibiting both high volume (233 properties) and a high concentration (40.2% investor ownership rate).

Another area of significant investor focus is 47848, with 175 investor-owned properties and a 36.4% ownership rate.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.14x buy/sell ratio in Q4; only 5.6% of purchases came from other landlords.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sullivan County are in a strong accumulation phase, ending Q4 2025 as decisive net buyers with 36 acquisitions versus only 7 sales.

This aggressive 5.14-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 is consistent with the trend for the entire year, where landlords purchased 107 properties and sold just 14, a ratio of 7.64-to-1.

While still accumulating, the pace of acquisitions has moderated slightly, down from 123 properties purchased in 2024 to 107 in 2025.

In contrast to the broader market, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were neutral in Q4, with their activity balanced at one purchase and one sale.

The data indicates that investors are primarily acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market, as inter-landlord transactions made up a very small fraction of Q4 purchases.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investors were involved in 36.4% of all 99 Sullivan County home transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 36 of the 99 total SFR transactions for a 36.4% market share.

A dramatic pricing disparity reveals different acquisition strategies among investors. The institutional buyer in Q4 paid an average of $90,170, a remarkable 52.8% less than the $190,995 average paid by new single-property landlords.

This price difference of over $100,000 per property suggests institutions are targeting distressed assets or off-market deals unavailable to new entrants.

Transaction activity was dominated by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who conducted 33 of the 36 landlord transactions.

Smaller, established landlords (3-5 properties) were the most active in trading among peers, sourcing 33.3% of their purchases from other investors, compared to just 3.6% for first-time buyers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 96.5% of Sullivan County's rental homes and drove 38% of Q4 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,502 single-family properties in Sullivan County, representing 27.8% of the market, with individual investors overwhelmingly in control, holding 1,282 of those properties (85.4%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured a 7.9% pricing advantage over homeowners, paying an average of $175,207 per property—a discount of $15,087.
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4, purchasing 37.7% of all homes sold (26 properties), with activity led by 28 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate the market with 96.5% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ tier) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners (51.4%) in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier, indicating a shift to corporate structures for scaling.
Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4 with a 5.14-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio (36 buys vs 7 sells), while the single active institutional investor was neutral, buying one and selling one.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Sullivan County, Indiana, is fundamentally a grassroots phenomenon, not a corporate one. Investors own 1,502 single-family homes, comprising 27.8% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 96.5% of all investor-owned housing. Individual investors own 85.4% of these properties, leaving a minimal footprint for companies and a virtually nonexistent 0.1% share for institutional investors.

Investor behavior is characterized by active acquisition and savvy pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 37.7% of all homes sold, demonstrating their significant influence on market activity. They operated as strong net buyers, acquiring over five properties for every one they sold, and secured a 7.9% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. A stark contrast in strategy is evident between new mom-and-pop buyers, who paid an average of $190,995, and the lone institutional buyer, who acquired a property for just $90,170, suggesting a focus on distressed or off-market assets.

The key takeaway for the Sullivan County housing market is its resilience to the national narrative of corporate landlord expansion. The market's health and growth are driven by local, individual investors, evidenced by the 28 new single-property landlords who entered in Q4 alone. This structure suggests a fragmented rental market, likely characterized by direct landlord-tenant relationships rather than large-scale property management. The primary force shaping real estate investment here is the individual buyer, making it a quintessential Main Street, not Wall Street, market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 09:16 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Sullivan (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Sullivan (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-in-sullivan/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.