Piatt (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Piatt (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Piatt (IL)
6,202
Total Investors in Piatt (IL)
223
Investor Owned SFR in Piatt (IL)
168(2.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
208
SFR Owned
155
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
15
SFR Owned
16
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 168 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Piatt County's Investor Market: Dominated by Small Landlords with Zero Q4 Activity
Investors own 168 single-family properties in Piatt County, representing just 2.7% of the market. This small portfolio is almost entirely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.4%), with individual investors owning 92.3% of the properties. The market showed no signs of activity in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or transactions recorded for investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 168 properties, with individuals holding a dominant 92.3% share.
The entire investor-owned portfolio of 168 properties is held in cash, with zero financed properties recorded. Of these, 158 properties are confirmed rentals, highlighting the income-focused nature of ownership in the county. The market is composed of 223 landlords, with 208 being individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 landlord acquisition data is available due to zero purchase activity.
A complete lack of landlord purchases in Q4 2025 prevents any price comparison against traditional homeowners. Historical data shows an average landlord acquisition price of $97,433 during the 2020-2023 period, but recent trends cannot be established.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made up 0.0% of market purchases in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions.
Mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases this quarter. No new single-property landlords entered the market, indicating a complete halt in investor entry and expansion.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone own 83.7% of all investor-held housing (144 properties). Institutional investors have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market. No pricing data by tier is available for recent periods.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to inactivity.
Individual landlords are the majority owners in every single active tier, including 92.5% of single-property portfolios. Companies never become the majority at any portfolio size, reflecting their minimal role in this market.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 61856 and 61818.
The zip code 61856 holds the highest number of investor-owned properties at 38. However, 61839 has the highest investor penetration rate at 7.2%, well above the county average of 2.7%.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying patterns.
Without buy/sell transaction data, it is impossible to determine if landlords are net buyers or sellers. Similarly, analysis of inter-landlord transactions and price margins cannot be performed.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, with zero recorded deals.
Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers reported zero transactions. Consequently, there is no data on inter-landlord trading activity or average purchase prices for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 168 properties, with individuals holding a dominant 92.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Piatt County constitutes a small fraction of the housing market, with 168 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties representing just 2.7% of the total 6,202 SFRs.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors rather than companies. Individuals own 155 of the 168 investor properties, a commanding 92.3% share, reinforcing a 'mom-and-pop' landlord structure.

A significant financial characteristic of this market is the complete absence of leverage; 100% of the 168 investor-owned properties are owned outright with cash, indicating a financially conservative and stable investor base.

The primary strategy for investors is rental income, with 158 properties identified as rented. This focus on long-term rental holdings is consistent with the cash-heavy ownership pattern.

The landlord landscape is highly fragmented, with 223 distinct landlord entities (208 individuals and 15 companies) managing the 168-property portfolio. This suggests a market of many small-scale participants rather than consolidated ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 landlord acquisition data is available due to zero purchase activity.
Detailed Findings

There was no recorded landlord purchase activity in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison to traditional homeowners for the quarter impossible. This lack of activity signals a dormant market for new investor acquisitions.

Due to zero transactions, an analysis of the landlord-homeowner price gap cannot be performed for the recent quarter. The market's inactivity prevents the identification of any current purchasing discounts or premiums for investors.

Historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price for landlords at $97,433, which serves as the most recent baseline for valuation before the current period of inactivity.

Without recent purchases, it is not possible to determine price appreciation trends from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) into the current market conditions in Piatt County.

The absence of buying activity from both individual and company landlords in Q4 2025 suggests that market conditions were not favorable for either investor type to expand their portfolios.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made up 0.0% of market purchases in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was non-existent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 0 total SFRs sold in Piatt County, representing a 0.0% market share.

The quiet quarter extended across all investor sizes, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) recorded zero purchases, mirroring the lack of activity from larger investors.

No new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025. The number of new single-property (Tier 01) investors was zero, signaling a barrier to entry or lack of interest in the current climate.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no presence in the county's acquisition market, with zero properties purchased, consistent with their 0.0% overall ownership share.

The complete absence of purchasing activity across every investor tier underscores a market-wide pause on portfolio growth during the final quarter of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Piatt County is almost entirely composed of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.4% of the 168 investor-owned SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the foundation of the market, with 144 properties falling into this tier. This represents 83.7% of all investor-owned housing, the highest concentration in any single tier.

In stark contrast to national trends, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have absolutely no footprint in Piatt County, with an ownership share of 0.0%.

The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards the smallest players, with landlords owning 2 properties accounting for 5.8% (10 properties) and those owning 3-5 properties making up 9.3% (16 properties).

Due to the lack of recent transaction activity, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier. The market's static nature prevents a comparison of purchasing strategies between small and large landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No pricing data is available to compare individual and company buyers due to inactivity.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across all portfolio sizes in Piatt County. In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 136 of the 144 properties (92.5%).

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Individual ownership remains dominant even in the multi-property tiers, such as the two-property (80.0% individual) and 3-5 property (93.8% individual) segments.

Company ownership represents a niche segment of the market. The largest company footprint is in the two-property tier, where they own 2 properties, constituting just 20.0% of that tier.

A comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company landlords cannot be conducted, as neither group made any purchases in Q4 2025.

The consistent dominance of individual landlords across every tier highlights a market driven by personal investment rather than corporate strategy, with no signs of this trend changing.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 61856 and 61818.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Piatt County is not evenly distributed, with specific zip codes showing higher concentrations. The zip code 61856 contains the largest number of investor-owned homes, with 38 properties.

The highest rate of investor penetration occurs in the 61839 zip code, where investors own 7.2% of the SFR housing stock. This is nearly three times the county-wide average of 2.7%, indicating a pocket of significant rental presence.

Monticello's zip code, 61856, has the largest absolute count of investor properties (38) but a relatively low ownership rate of 1.3%, suggesting a large overall housing market.

Bement (61813) and Cerro Gordo (61818) also show notable investor presence, contributing to the geographic clustering of rental properties within the county.

Several smaller zip codes, such as 61851 and 61853, have no recorded investor-owned SFRs, highlighting the hyper-local nature of investment activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying patterns.
Detailed Findings

A lack of available historical transaction data for Piatt County prevents a conclusive analysis of long-term landlord behavior. It is not possible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

The volume of landlord-to-landlord transactions, a key indicator of market liquidity and investor sentiment, cannot be calculated. This leaves the internal dynamics of the investor market unknown.

An analysis of implied profit margins is not feasible, as there is no data comparing average buy prices to average sell prices over time.

Similarly, the transaction patterns of institutional investors cannot be assessed. However, given their 0.0% ownership, their transaction activity is presumed to be zero.

The absence of this data suggests that Piatt County is a low-velocity market where properties are held for long durations, with infrequent transactions among investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of Q4 2025 transactions, with zero recorded deals.
Detailed Findings

The real estate transaction market in Piatt County was completely static for investors in Q4 2025, with landlords involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions.

Activity was halted across all investor sizes. Transaction volumes were zero for every tier, from single-property landlords up to the largest theoretical portfolios.

No inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, indicating no portfolio turnover or consolidation among existing investors.

A price analysis by tier is impossible due to the lack of transactions. The average purchase price for all tiers, including the typically active mom-and-pop segments, was $0.

The Q4 data confirms a period of profound inactivity, suggesting that existing landlords are holding their assets and no new investors are deploying capital in the region.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Piatt County's hyper-local investor market sees 99.4% mom-and-pop control and a complete halt in Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 168 single-family properties, representing 2.7% of the Piatt County market, with individual investors holding a dominant 155 properties (92.3%) compared to 16 for companies (9.5%).
Pricing
No landlord acquisition activity was recorded in Q4 2025, making a price comparison against traditional homeowners impossible and indicating a dormant market.
Activity
Investors made zero purchases in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of all sales, with no new single-property landlords entering the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market at 99.4%, while institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence with a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, controlling 92.5% of single-property portfolios; companies fail to achieve majority status at any level.
Transactions
No landlord transactions (buys or sells) were recorded in Q4 2025, making it impossible to determine a net buyer or seller status and reflecting a completely static market.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Piatt County, Illinois is small, stable, and fundamentally local. Investors own just 168 single-family properties, a modest 2.7% of the total housing stock. The market's structure is defined by individual participation, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 99.4% of investor-owned homes. Individual investors own 92.3% of these assets, leaving a minimal role for corporate entities and a 0.0% share for institutional investors, placing this market outside the influence of large-scale capital.

Investor behavior in Piatt County is characterized by stability and a lack of speculative activity. The entire 168-property portfolio is owned outright with cash, signaling a low-risk, long-term hold strategy. This stability was reflected in Q4 2025, which saw a complete halt in activity, with zero properties purchased or transacted by investors. This inactivity prevents any analysis of current pricing strategies or comparisons to the broader homeowner market, suggesting investors are content to hold assets rather than expand or divest in the current climate.

The key takeaway is that Piatt County's SFR investment landscape is a closed ecosystem, driven by small, local landlords and insulated from broader market volatility. The zero-activity quarter points to a mature, low-velocity market where rental properties rarely trade hands. For the foreseeable future, this market is likely to remain a bastion of small-scale, individual ownership, with market dynamics dictated by local economic conditions rather than national investment trends.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 02:52 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Piatt (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Piatt (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-il-piatt/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.