Will (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Will (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Will (IL)
211,583
Total Investors in Will (IL)
30,086
Investor Owned SFR in Will (IL)
25,257(11.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
26,917
SFR Owned
19,757
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,169
SFR Owned
5,939
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 25,257 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Will County with 66% of Q4 Purchases as Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Investors own 25,257 SFR properties in Will County, representing 11.9% of the market. Small, individual landlords control the vast majority of this portfolio (89.9%) and drove Q4 activity by purchasing 66.4% of all homes sold, while large institutional investors were net sellers, divesting local assets.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 25,257 SFR properties in Will County, with individuals owning 78.2% of the portfolio.
Of the investor-owned portfolio, 97.9% of properties are classified as rented. Landlords rely heavily on financing, with 14,319 properties (56.7%) carrying a mortgage, compared to 10,938 (43.3%) owned outright with cash.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 3.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $14,427 per property.
The landlord pricing advantage is volatile, reversing a trend from Q3 and Q1 where they paid premiums of 2.2% and 1.3% respectively. Prices have appreciated significantly, with the Q4 average of $385,887 marking a 66.3% increase from the 2020-2023 average.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased a commanding 66.4% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 97.4% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) acquired only 3 homes, representing a mere 0.3% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 89.9% of all investor-owned housing in Will County.
In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 4.1% of the portfolio. In Q4, new single-property landlords paid 31.7% more per property than institutional buyers ($396,503 vs $270,667).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 70.7% of homes.
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 88.6% of single-property holdings. This trend reverses sharply as portfolios grow, with companies owning 95.1% of properties in the 21-50 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 60435 zip code, which holds 2,299 investor-owned properties.
However, the highest investor saturation is in 60543, where investors own 46.2% of all SFRs. The 60436 zip code is a key hub, ranking 4th in total count (1,391) and 2nd in ownership rate (27.0%).
Historical Transactions
A stark market divide shows landlords are strong net buyers while institutional investors are consistent net sellers.
In Q4 2025, landlords overall purchased 7.7 times more properties than they sold (1,702 buys vs. 221 sells). In contrast, institutional investors sold 4.7 times more than they bought (14 sells vs. 3 buys).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, participating in 64.8% of all single-family home transactions.
A significant price gap exists, with institutional investors paying 31.7% less than new single-property landlords ($270,667 vs. $396,503). Institutions were also more likely to buy from other landlords (33.3% of purchases) compared to new investors (10.6%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 25,257 SFR properties in Will County, with individuals owning 78.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 11.9% share of the single-family residential market in Will County, IL, with a total portfolio of 25,257 properties.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 19,757 properties, accounting for 78.2% of the investor-owned housing stock, while companies own the remaining 5,939 properties (23.5%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of entities, where 26,917 individual landlords far outnumber the 3,169 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 8.5 to 1.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 24,740 properties (97.9%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, confirming the business focus of these holdings.

Leverage is a key strategy for investors in the area, as 56.7% of the portfolio (14,319 properties) is financed, while 43.3% (10,938 properties) is owned free and clear.

On average, company landlords manage larger portfolios, holding approximately 1.9 properties per entity, compared to the roughly 0.7 properties per individual entity, which reflects co-ownership and a focus on smaller holdings among individuals.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 3.6% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $14,427 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors demonstrated a distinct pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $385,887, which is 3.6% less than the $400,314 paid by traditional homeowners—a savings of $14,427 per home.

This investor discount has been inconsistent, suggesting opportunistic buying rather than a permanent structural advantage. The Q4 discount marks a reversal from Q3 2025, when landlords paid a 2.2% premium ($9,014 more than homeowners), and from Q1 2025's 1.3% premium.

The market has seen substantial price appreciation since the pandemic era. The average Q4 2025 landlord purchase price of $385,887 represents a 66.3% increase over the average price of $231,999 recorded between 2020 and 2023.

While landlords secured a discount in the most recent quarter, the narrow 0.4% discount in Q2 2025 highlights the fluctuating nature of their purchasing power relative to the broader market.

The overall price trend for landlords in 2025 shows a slight cooling from Q2 highs, with the average acquisition price dropping from $420,486 in Q2 to $385,887 in Q4.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased a commanding 66.4% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord activity surged in Q4 2025, with investors acquiring 1,134 of the 1,708 total SFRs sold, capturing a dominant 66.4% share of the market.

The market was overwhelmingly fueled by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (those with 1-10 properties) were responsible for 1,112 of these purchases, making up 97.4% of all landlord acquisition activity.

A massive wave of new entrants joined the market, as 1,560 new single-property landlords acquired 1,021 homes, accounting for 89.4% of all properties bought by investors this quarter.

Institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties had a negligible presence, purchasing only 3 properties, or 0.3% of the landlord total, highlighting their lack of activity in the Will County market.

The data reveals a highly fragmented acquisition landscape, where the overwhelming majority of buying is conducted not by large corporations, but by individuals and small businesses entering or expanding their presence in the rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 89.9% of all investor-owned housing in Will County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned housing market in Will County is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators. Landlords with 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) own a combined 89.9% of the entire investor SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 19,198 properties, or 74.1% of all investor holdings. This demonstrates that the typical landlord is not a large corporation but an individual with a single rental home.

Despite common narratives, the influence of institutional investors is minimal. The largest players (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) own just 1,070 homes, representing only 4.1% of the total investor-owned supply.

Mid-size investors (11-1,000 properties) represent a small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 6.0% of properties, highlighting a significant gap between small mom-and-pop landlords and large institutions.

A clear pricing disparity exists across tiers. Q4 transaction data shows single-property buyers paid an average of $396,503, while institutional investors paid $270,667—securing a 31.7% discount, likely due to scale and ability to purchase off-market or distressed assets.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 70.7% of homes.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover point exists where ownership strategy shifts from individual to corporate structure. While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners (70.7%) in the 11-20 property tier.

The smallest portfolios are almost exclusively held by individuals. They own 88.6% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 73.6% of two-property portfolios, underscoring the grassroots nature of the market's entry point.

The 6-10 property tier acts as a transition zone. Here, ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals holding a slight majority at 50.9% compared to companies at 49.1%, marking the pivot toward professionalization.

Beyond 20 properties, corporate ownership is nearly absolute. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own 95.1% of the homes, indicating that scaling a rental portfolio is strongly correlated with incorporation for liability and operational purposes.

This pattern reveals a clear lifecycle for real estate investors in Will County: starting as individuals and incorporating as their portfolios expand to a more professional scale.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 60435 zip code, which holds 2,299 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals heavy concentration of investor ownership by volume in specific areas, with the top five zip codes by count holding 8,299 properties, which is 32.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Will County.

The 60435 zip code is the epicenter of investor holdings by sheer volume, containing 2,299 investor-owned properties, significantly more than any other area.

The metric for market penetration tells a different story. The highest density of investors is found in the 60543 zip code, where an astonishing 46.2% of all single-family residences are investor-owned.

A critical hotspot for both volume and density is the 60436 zip code. It ranks fourth for total investor properties (1,391) while also having the second-highest ownership rate at 27.0%, making it a core target for real estate investment.

This divergence between volume and penetration leaders suggests varied investor strategies. Some zip codes attract a high number of investors in a large housing market, while others represent smaller markets with extremely high saturation levels.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
A stark market divide shows landlords are strong net buyers while institutional investors are consistent net sellers.
Detailed Findings

The transaction data reveals a fundamental split in market direction between small and large investors. Landlords as a whole are aggressively accumulating properties, while the largest institutional players are actively divesting their holdings in Will County.

In Q4 2025, the broader landlord market demonstrated a strong appetite for growth, purchasing 1,702 homes while selling only 221—a net gain of 1,481 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.7x.

This net-buyer trend has been consistent and robust throughout the year, with landlords recording a net gain of 7,040 properties in 2025, nearly mirroring the 7,553 net properties acquired in 2024.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ portfolio) are in a sustained retreat. In Q4, they bought only 3 properties but sold 14, resulting in a net loss of 11 properties. This continues a multi-year trend of selling off assets.

The institutional divestment has accelerated. In 2025, they sold a net 67 properties, a significant increase from the net 50 properties they sold in 2024, signaling a strategic withdrawal from the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, participating in 64.8% of all single-family home transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary driver of market activity in Q4 2025, taking part in 1,702 of the 2,625 total transactions, which translates to a commanding 64.8% share of all SFR sales and purchases.

The overwhelming majority of this activity came from the smallest players. Single-property landlords alone accounted for 1,562 transactions, while institutional investors were involved in only 3.

A stark pricing divide separates large and small investors. In Q4, single-property landlords paid an average of $396,503, a price point likely competitive with traditional homeowners. In contrast, institutional investors acquired properties for just $270,667 on average, a 31.7% discount.

Sourcing strategies also differ by investor size. The largest institutional investors relied on the existing landlord network for deals, acquiring 33.3% of their properties from other landlords.

New, smaller investors primarily bought from the open market, with only 10.6% of their purchases coming from other landlords. This suggests they are competing directly with homeowners rather than participating in a specialized investor-to-investor marketplace.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Fuel 66% of Q4 Purchases in Will County While Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 25,257 SFR properties in Will County, IL (11.9% of the market), with individual investors holding 19,757 (78.2%) and companies owning 5,939 (23.5%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid 3.6% less than homeowners, a discount of $14,427 per property ($385,887 vs. $400,314).
Activity
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 1,134 properties (66.4% of all sales), with 1,560 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 89.9% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 4.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies take majority control in portfolios of 11-20 properties and larger.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 7.7x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (1,702 buys vs. 221 sells), while institutional investors are net sellers (3 buys vs. 14 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Will County, IL is defined by the dominance of small, individual investors. Landlords own 25,257 properties, representing 11.9% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 89.9% of all investor-owned homes. In stark contrast, large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, controlling just 4.1%. The ownership structure is primarily private, with individual investors owning 78.2% of the properties, though a shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios grow beyond 10 properties.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights a clear divergence in strategy based on scale. Small investors flooded the market, with landlords acquiring a staggering 66.4% of all homes sold, driven by 1,560 new single-property entrants. These smaller buyers paid prices competitive with retail, securing only a 3.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. The largest institutional players, however, were net sellers, continuing a multi-year trend of divesting local assets. When they did buy, they achieved significant discounts, paying 31.7% less than new landlords, and sourced a third of their deals from other investors.

The key takeaway is a tale of two markets: one where a growing base of individual landlords is actively accumulating properties and driving market demand, and another where sophisticated institutional capital is strategically retreating. This dynamic suggests the health and future direction of the Will County rental market is tied not to Wall Street, but to the financial capacity and sentiment of thousands of local, small-scale investors who are aggressively expanding their footprint.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 03:10 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Will (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Will (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-il-will/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.