Morton (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Morton (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Morton (KS)
946
Total Investors in Morton (KS)
939
Investor Owned SFR in Morton (KS)
757(80.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
874
SFR Owned
692
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
65
SFR Owned
75
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 757 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Morton County's investor market is landlord-dominated, with 80% ownership and zero recent sales activity.
Investors own 757 single-family residential properties in Morton County, representing an 80.0% market share. The market is defined by small, individual landlords who control 99.9% of the investor-owned housing stock, with all properties owned outright in cash. A complete lack of recorded transactions in Q4 2025 signals a highly stable, illiquid rental market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 757 properties, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 91.4% share.
The entire investor portfolio of 757 properties is owned free and clear with cash, as zero properties are financed. Indicating a strong rental focus, 99.9% of these properties (756 of 757) are classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 transaction data is available to compare landlord and homeowner prices.
There were no recorded property purchases by either landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, making a price comparison impossible. The only historical data point is a 2020-2023 average landlord price of $89,935, but with zero properties associated, this figure is not statistically relevant.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made 0% of the purchases in Q4 2025, as no SFR transactions were recorded.
There was a complete halt in market activity, with zero properties purchased by any investor tier. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero acquisitions for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
There is no price data available for any tier due to a lack of recent transactions. The market shows zero presence from institutional investors, who own 0.0% of the housing stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
No recent transaction data exists to compare pricing between individual and company buyers.
Individuals dominate every single active tier; a crossover point where companies become the majority does not exist in this market. The largest properties held by a company fall into the 3-5 property tier, where they own 9 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 81.6% of all investor-owned properties in a single zip code.
The top region, zip code 67950, has an investor ownership rate of 81.6%. The second most active region, zip code 67954, has a similarly high ownership rate of 80.6%.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying and selling patterns.
The absence of recorded buy or sell transactions prevents any analysis of net buyer/seller status, landlord-to-landlord activity, or price comparisons between acquisitions and dispositions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q4 2025 transactions, as no sales were recorded.
With zero transactions, a price comparison between institutional and mom-and-pop tiers is not possible. There was no inter-landlord trading activity during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 757 properties, with individual landlords controlling a dominant 91.4% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Morton County is exceptionally high, with 757 single-family properties representing 80.0% of the total 946 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors are the cornerstone of this market, owning 692 properties, which constitutes a 91.4% share of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, company-owned properties number just 75, or 9.9% of the portfolio.

The market is entirely cash-driven, with 100% of the 757 investor-owned properties held without financing. This indicates a financially stable landlord base with no mortgage leverage on their rental assets.

A powerful indicator of the market's rental focus is that 756 of the 757 investor properties (99.9%) are rented, demonstrating that nearly every property is actively used as a rental unit.

By entity count, individual landlords vastly outnumber companies, with 874 individuals compared to just 65 companies, a ratio of more than 13 to 1. This highlights the granular, community-level nature of rental ownership in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 transaction data is available to compare landlord and homeowner prices.
Detailed Findings

A direct price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners is not possible for Q4 2025, as there were zero recorded SFR purchases by either group in Morton County.

The complete absence of recent sales data prevents any analysis of pricing trends, such as a landlord discount or price appreciation, for the current period.

Historical data from 2020-2023 shows an average acquisition price of $89,935, but this is based on zero properties purchased during that timeframe, indicating a prolonged period of low to no market activity.

The lack of transactional velocity suggests a buy-and-hold market where properties rarely change hands, rather than an active investment environment.

Without recent sales, it is impossible to determine current market valuations or ascertain if a price gap exists between different buyer types in Morton County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made 0% of the purchases in Q4 2025, as no SFR transactions were recorded.
Detailed Findings

The investor purchase market in Morton County was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero properties out of a total of zero SFR market purchases.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both accounting for 0.0% of purchases.

The data indicates no new landlords entered the market in Q4 2025, as the single-property (Tier 01) category saw no acquisition activity.

The stillness in the market suggests a period of equilibrium or illiquidity where no new investment is flowing into the single-family rental sector.

Comparing Q4 to historical data is not possible due to the complete absence of transactions, highlighting the extremely low-velocity nature of this real estate market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.9% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Morton County is defined by an overwhelming concentration of small landlords, with Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively owning 99.9% of the 757 investor-held properties.

Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) are the largest group, holding 614 properties, which accounts for 78.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR market.

Mid-size and institutional investors are virtually non-existent. Landlords with 11-1000 properties are absent, and institutional investors (Tier 09) have a 0.0% market share.

The two-property tier holds 101 properties (12.9%), and the 3-5 property tier holds 53 properties (6.8%), reinforcing the market's small-scale ownership structure.

Due to the lack of sales activity, there is no available data to compare acquisition prices across different tiers, either historically or in the recent quarter.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
No recent transaction data exists to compare pricing between individual and company buyers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all active portfolio tiers in Morton County, demonstrating their control at every level of the market.

In the largest single-property tier, individuals own 567 properties (91.5%) compared to just 53 (8.5%) for companies. This pattern continues up the scale, with individuals owning 88.1% of two-property portfolios and 83.0% of 3-5 property portfolios.

There is no crossover tier where companies become the majority owners. In fact, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 100% of the 13 properties.

The data shows a complete absence of institutional-scale companies, reflecting a market composed entirely of small-scale operators.

A price comparison between individual and company buyers is not possible as there is no record of recent acquisitions for either owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with 81.6% of all investor-owned properties in a single zip code.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Morton County is intensely localized, with the vast majority of activity confined to a few areas. The zip code 67950 is the epicenter, containing 618 investor-owned properties, which is 81.6% of the county's total investor portfolio.

The top two zip codes by investor property count, 67950 and 67954, together account for 747 of the 757 investor-owned properties, representing 98.7% of all holdings.

Investor penetration rates are extremely high in the core markets. In 67950, investors own 81.6% of the SFR housing stock, and in 67954, they own 80.6%.

In contrast, areas like zip code 67953 show a much lower, though still significant, investor presence, with 10 properties and a 34.5% ownership rate.

This geographic distribution reveals that the high county-wide investor ownership rate is not evenly spread but is driven by profound concentration in specific communities.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available to assess landlord buying and selling patterns.
Detailed Findings

There is no available historical transaction data for landlords in Morton County, making it impossible to determine their net position as buyers or sellers.

Without transaction records, key metrics such as the buy/sell ratio cannot be calculated to gauge market sentiment or momentum over time.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is not possible, so the percentage of purchases from other landlords or sales to other landlords remains unknown.

Similarly, a comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices, which could imply profit margins, cannot be performed due to the lack of data.

The same data gap applies to institutional investors (1000+ tier), whose transaction patterns and market influence cannot be assessed.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords had a 0.0% share of Q4 2025 transactions, as no sales were recorded.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of market transactions in Morton County, with total transactions numbering zero.

As a result, landlords were involved in 0.0% of market activity, reflecting a total freeze in both buying and selling across the investor community.

Transaction volumes were zero for every investor tier, from single-property landlords to the largest portfolios, indicating the inactivity was widespread.

It is not possible to analyze purchasing strategies, as the average purchase price for all tiers was $0 due to the lack of sales.

There was no recorded inter-landlord activity, meaning no properties were traded between existing investors during Q4 2025.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Morton County's rental market is controlled by cash-rich individuals, with 80% investor ownership and zero recent market activity.
Holdings
Investors own 757 single-family residential properties, an 80.0% penetration of the Morton County market. Individual investors dominate, holding 692 properties (91.4%) compared to just 75 (9.9%) for companies.
Pricing
No landlord or homeowner purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison and discount calculation impossible.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in market activity, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, representing 0.0% of all sales, and no new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.9% of all investor housing while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, controlling 91.5% of single-property portfolios; a crossover point to company majority does not exist.
Transactions
With zero buys and zero sells recorded in Q4 2025, landlords were neither net buyers nor net sellers, indicating a completely dormant and illiquid market.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Morton County, Kansas, is characterized by an exceptionally high level of investor saturation and a distinct lack of institutional presence. Investors own 757 properties, commanding an 80.0% share of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by 874 individual investors who own 91.4% of the rental portfolio, compared to just 65 companies. Reinforcing this dynamic, small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.9% of investor-owned homes, leaving no room for mid-size or institutional players.

Investor behavior in Morton County is defined by stability and a complete absence of recent transactional activity. In Q4 2025, there were zero recorded purchases or sales by landlords, signaling a dormant, illiquid market where assets are rarely traded. This buy-and-hold strategy is further evidenced by portfolio composition; 100% of the 757 investor properties are owned outright with cash, with no mortgage financing. This debt-free ownership structure suggests a focus on long-term rental income rather than speculative, transaction-based returns.

The key takeaway from the data is that Morton County represents a closed-loop, self-contained rental economy rather than an active investment market. The profound dominance of local, cash-rich, small-scale landlords and the absolute lack of recent sales activity point to a stable but static environment. This structure provides housing stability but also implies significant barriers to entry for new buyers and limited options for tenants, a stark contrast to the fluid, high-velocity dynamics of more metropolitan real estate markets across the United States.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 06:09 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Morton (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Morton (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-morton/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.