Floyd (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Floyd (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Floyd (IN)
26,300
Total Investors in Floyd (IN)
3,039
Investor Owned SFR in Floyd (IN)
2,808(10.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,502
SFR Owned
2,013
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
537
SFR Owned
817
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,808 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small "Mom-and-Pop" Landlords Dominate 91% of Floyd County's Rental Market as Acquisition Activity Cools
In Floyd County, investors own 10.7% of single-family homes (2,808 properties), with small-scale landlords controlling 91.2% versus a mere 0.6% for institutions. In Q4 2025, landlord purchasing slowed to just 2.1% of market sales, though they secured a 10.7% price discount vs. homeowners and shifted from net sellers to net buyers for the quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 2,808 homes in Floyd County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 71.7% share.
Cash is the primary funding source, with 75.0% of investor properties (2,107) owned outright compared to just 701 financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 2,701 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Floyd County landlords paid 10.7% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant $37,439 average discount.
The landlord pricing advantage is highly volatile, swinging from a 36.6% premium in Q2 2025 to a 34.2% discount in Q3. Price data is not available to compare individual versus company investors.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for just 2.1% of Q4 home purchases in Floyd County, acquiring only 6 of 280 properties sold.
Activity was exclusively from small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords accounting for 100% of purchases. Institutional investors made zero acquisitions in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 91.2% of investor-owned homes in Floyd County.
Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 16 properties, or 0.6% of the investor portfolio. Price comparison data by ownership tier is not available for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Price differences between individual and company buyers are not available in this dataset for Floyd County.
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 52.2% of properties in that segment. Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, owning 83.9% of all single-property rentals.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Floyd County is most concentrated by volume in the 47119 zip code, which contains 289 properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is found in the 47150 zip code, where 13.2% of homes are investor-owned. The area with the most investor properties, 47119, has a lower ownership rate of 7.0%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords shifted to become net buyers in Q4 2025 (9 buys vs. 7 sells) after two quarters of net selling.
Investor purchasing has slowed dramatically, with only 44 acquisitions in 2025 compared to 204 in 2024, a 78.4% decrease. For the full year 2025, landlords were net sellers, divesting a net 7 properties.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in just 2.2% of Floyd County's Q4 market transactions, totaling 9 acquisitions.
Activity was driven exclusively by mom-and-pop investors, who paid an average price of $313,220. Institutional investors made zero transactions, and 0% of landlord purchases came from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 2,808 homes in Floyd County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 71.7% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 10.7% share of the single-family residential market in Floyd County, owning 2,808 of the 26,300 total SFR properties.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 2,013 properties (71.7%), compared to 817 properties (29.1%) owned by companies. This counters the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental space.

A cash-heavy strategy prevails among investors, with 2,107 properties (75.0%) owned free and clear, while only 701 are financed. This suggests a focus on long-term holds and lower-risk investment approaches.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to generating rental income, as 2,701 properties (96.2%) are classified as rented or non-owner-occupied.

While individuals make up the vast majority of landlords (2,502 of 3,039), companies tend to manage slightly larger portfolios on average, indicating a degree of professionalization as holdings grow.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Floyd County landlords paid 10.7% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant $37,439 average discount.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $313,220, which is 10.7% or $37,439 below the average traditional homeowner price of $350,659.

The landlord discount has been extremely volatile throughout the year, from paying a surprising 36.6% premium ($126,597 more than homeowners) in Q2 to securing a massive 41.8% discount ($134,820) in Q1.

The Q4 discount of 10.7% represents a moderation from the previous quarter, where landlords achieved an even larger 34.2% discount, saving an average of $122,076 per property compared to homeowners.

Due to extremely low purchase volumes reported for landlords in recent yearly timeframes, tracking long-term price appreciation from 2020-2023 to 2025 is not feasible with the available data.

The low number of landlord acquisitions in Q4 (only 6 properties) suggests that the average price, while notable, could be influenced by the specific characteristics of just a few transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for just 2.1% of Q4 home purchases in Floyd County, acquiring only 6 of 280 properties sold.
Detailed Findings

Investor acquisition activity was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing just 6 of the 280 total SFR properties sold, capturing a meager 2.1% of the market.

The quarter's activity was driven entirely by new or nascent investors, as 100% of the 6 properties purchased were by single-property landlords (Tier 01).

These acquisitions led to the formation of 9 new landlord entities, indicating that co-ownership was a factor in the few purchases that did occur.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) were completely absent from the market, making zero purchases and showing no appetite for acquisition in Floyd County during Q4.

The data confirms that the active investor base in Q4 was composed entirely of mom-and-pop landlords, with no participation from mid-size or large-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 91.2% of investor-owned homes in Floyd County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Floyd County is dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a combined 91.2% of all investor-held SFRs.

The single-property tier forms the bedrock of the rental market, accounting for 1,883 properties, or 64.8% of the entire investor-owned portfolio on its own.

In stark contrast to national headlines, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a minimal presence, controlling only 16 properties, which amounts to a mere 0.6% of the local investor market.

There is a significant drop-off in ownership after the smallest tiers, with mid-size landlords holding between 11 and 100 properties collectively owning just 6.2% of the portfolio.

Large landlords (101-1000 properties) represent a niche segment, holding 58 properties (2.0%), a share that is more than three times larger than that of institutional investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Price differences between individual and company buyers are not available in this dataset for Floyd County.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges across tiers: individual investors control the smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier (52.2% company-owned).

Individuals form the foundation of the rental market, owning 83.9% of single-property portfolios and 66.2% of two-property portfolios.

As portfolio sizes increase, so does the rate of incorporation. Company ownership climbs to 73.6% in the 11-20 property tier and reaches 86.2% for large landlords (101-1000 properties).

This trend suggests a strategic shift towards incorporation as landlords scale their operations beyond five properties, likely for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Even in the larger tiers, individual ownership persists. For example, individuals still own 13.8% of properties in the 101-1000 property tier, indicating that not all large-scale operators choose a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Floyd County is most concentrated by volume in the 47119 zip code, which contains 289 properties.
Detailed Findings

By sheer volume, the 47119 zip code is the primary hub for investor ownership, containing 289 properties, the most in Floyd County.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is in the 47150 zip code, where investors own 13.2% of all single-family homes, significantly exceeding the county-wide average of 10.7%.

The distinction between the top area by count (47119 at 7.0% rate) and the top area by rate (47150 at 13.2%) reveals divergent geographic investment strategies, one focused on scale and the other on market saturation.

Several other zip codes also show strong investor presence, with both 47124 and 47136 reporting a high 10.0% investor ownership rate.

The top three zip codes by property count (47119, 47122, and 47124) collectively hold 642 properties, representing 22.9% of the county's entire investor portfolio and signaling key sub-market focus.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords shifted to become net buyers in Q4 2025 (9 buys vs. 7 sells) after two quarters of net selling.
Detailed Findings

A notable shift occurred in market dynamics during Q4 2025, as landlords became net buyers with 9 acquisitions and 7 sales, reversing a trend of being net sellers in both Q2 and Q3.

Despite the Q4 reversal, the broader trend shows a massive slowdown in investor activity. The 44 properties purchased in all of 2025 represent a 78.4% collapse in acquisition volume compared to the 204 properties bought in 2024.

For the full year of 2025, investors were net sellers, having sold 51 properties while only acquiring 44, resulting in a net disposition of 7 properties from their collective portfolio.

The transaction data points to a significantly cooling market, with both acquisition and disposition volumes in 2025 falling far short of 2024 levels.

Data on institutional-level transactions is unavailable, which aligns with their minimal ownership footprint and lack of purchasing activity seen in other datasets for Floyd County.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in just 2.2% of Floyd County's Q4 market transactions, totaling 9 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a very small role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in only 9 of the 415 total transactions, for a market share of just 2.2%.

All 9 of these transactions were conducted by landlords in the single-property tier, reaffirming that market activity is confined to new entrants or the smallest-scale investors.

The average purchase price for these new mom-and-pop landlords in Q4 was $313,220.

Investors sourced 100% of their new properties from the general market, with 0% of transactions involving a landlord-to-landlord sale. This indicates a focus on acquiring properties from traditional homeowners.

Institutional investors remained completely on the sidelines, recording zero transactions and exerting no influence on the Q4 transactional market in Floyd County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 91.2% of rental homes in Floyd County as landlord acquisition activity plummets.
Holdings
Landlords own 2,808 SFR properties, 10.7% of the Floyd County market, with individual investors holding 2,013 (71.7%) and companies owning 817 (29.1%).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords secured a 10.7% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $313,220 versus the homeowner price of $350,659.
Activity
Landlords accounted for just 2.1% of Q4 sales (6 properties), with activity driven entirely by 9 new single-property landlord entities entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 91.2% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.6%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios larger than 5 properties, controlling 52.2% of the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
After being net sellers for most of the year, landlords shifted to net buyers in Q4 (9 buys vs 7 sells), though 2025 buying volume is down 78.4% from 2024.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned housing market in Floyd County, Indiana is defined by small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 2,808 single-family properties, representing 10.7% of the total market. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of individuals, who own 71.7% of the properties. The market structure analysis reveals that "mom-and-pop" landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 91.2% of investor-owned homes, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint of just 0.6%.

Investor behavior in 2025 signals a significant market cooldown. In Q4, landlords comprised just 2.1% of all buyers, with activity exclusively from new, single-property investors. While they are not buying much, they are buying strategically, securing an average 10.7% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. Transactionally, landlords shifted from being net sellers for most of the year to slight net buyers in Q4, though overall 2025 acquisition volume plummeted by 78.4% compared to 2024, indicating a sharp retreat from purchasing.

The key takeaway for the Floyd County housing market is that it remains a localized ecosystem where small-scale landlords are the primary rental providers. The narrative of a corporate takeover is unsupported by the data. Instead, the market is experiencing a quiet period, with dramatically reduced investor purchasing and a clear dominance by existing smallholders. This environment suggests stability driven by local capital rather than volatile, large-scale investment, but also indicates less new rental supply being created by investors compared to prior years.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Floyd (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Floyd (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-in-floyd/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.