Brown (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Brown (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Brown (KS)
2,932
Total Investors in Brown (KS)
855
Investor Owned SFR in Brown (KS)
738(25.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
784
SFR Owned
612
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
71
SFR Owned
128
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 738 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Brown County, Owning 25.2% of Homes and Buying at a 49% Discount
Investors own 738 Single-Family Residential properties in Brown County, KS, representing a significant 25.2% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (93.6%), not large institutions (0.1%). In Q4, investors purchased properties at an average 49.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners and continue to be strong net buyers, signaling sustained confidence and growth in the local rental market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 738 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 82.9% of the portfolio.
Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards cash ownership, with 603 properties owned outright versus 135 that are financed. The vast majority of these holdings, 715 of 738 properties, are non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors acquired properties for $108,245 in Q4, a staggering 49.3% discount compared to homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners is highly volatile, ranging from a 14.8% discount in Q1 to an 89.2% discount in Q2. Landlord acquisition prices have trended down, from a yearly average of $156,636 in 2024 to $97,204 in 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 15.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove the market, accounting for 83.3% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, highlighting their absence from the local market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a nearly non-existent footprint, controlling just one property, or 0.1% of the total investor portfolio. Single-property landlords alone own 70.3% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume 80.0% control at the 11-20 property tier.
The crossover from individual to corporate majority ownership happens decisively once a portfolio exceeds 10 properties. Companies further solidify their dominance in the 21-50 property tier, owning 93.3% of homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip codes 66434 (304 properties) and 66439 (226 properties).
The highest investor penetration rate is 51.6% in zip code 66094, where more than half of all homes are investor-owned. Four of the top five zip codes by rate have investor ownership above 30%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.75 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
This accumulation trend is consistent year-over-year, with a similar net-buyer position in 2024 (25 buys vs. 4 sells). Even the single institutional investor is in a growth phase, having acquired 2 properties and sold 1 in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a party to 16.9% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 10 transactions.
Smaller investors paid higher prices, with single-property landlords averaging $119,168 per transaction compared to just $97,321 for larger investors. Zero transactions occurred between landlords, indicating acquisitions came from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 738 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 82.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a substantial footprint in Brown County, KS, controlling 738 Single-Family Residential properties, which amounts to 25.2% of the entire SFR market.

The investor landscape is dominated by individuals, who own 612 properties (82.9%), compared to the 128 properties (17.3%) held by companies, underscoring the local, small-scale nature of ownership.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with investors owning 4.5 times more properties outright (603) than with financing (135), suggesting a market less dependent on traditional leverage.

The portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 715 of the 738 investor-owned properties classified as rented, indicating a clear focus on generating rental income.

The data reveals a high degree of co-ownership or partnership, with 855 distinct landlord entities collectively owning the 738 properties in the portfolio.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors acquired properties for $108,245 in Q4, a staggering 49.3% discount compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure deals, paying an average price of $108,245, which is $105,178 (49.3%) less than the average traditional homeowner paid ($213,423).

This significant purchasing advantage is a recurring pattern, though volatile. In Q2 2025, investors achieved an even more extreme discount of 89.2%, or $231,168, on their acquisitions.

The extreme discounts suggest that investors in Brown County are not competing for the same on-market properties as homeowners but are likely targeting distressed assets, off-market deals, or properties requiring significant renovation.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have seen a sharp decline, with the 2025 yearly average of $97,204 being 37.9% lower than the 2024 average of $156,636.

The consistent, deep discounts indicate a sophisticated acquisition strategy among local investors, allowing them to build portfolios at a much lower cost basis than the general public.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 15.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 15.8% of the total market in Q4, with landlords acquiring 6 of the 38 SFR properties that sold.

The market's growth is fueled by new and small-scale investors, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone were responsible for 5 of the 6 investor purchases (83.3%).

This quarter saw the entry of 8 new landlord entities into the market, all beginning with a single property, which signals healthy, grassroots-level interest in rental ownership.

Large institutional capital was entirely absent from the acquisitions market, with Tier 09 investors (1000+ properties) making zero purchases in Q4.

The purchasing activity clearly shows a market dominated by individuals and small businesses, with 83.3% of all landlord acquisitions made by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties).

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 93.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market structure in Brown County is highly fragmented and defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 93.6% share of all investor-owned homes.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, with their 534 properties representing 70.3% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1000+ properties) are not a factor in this market, owning just a single property, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor-held housing stock.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also represent a very small segment, collectively owning only 48 properties or 6.4% of the total.

This distribution reveals a market built on local, small-portfolio investors rather than consolidation by large corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume 80.0% control at the 11-20 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding 92.2% of single-property portfolios and over 70% in all tiers up to 10 properties.

A distinct strategic shift occurs as portfolios scale; in the 11-20 property tier, companies become the dominant legal structure, owning 12 of the 15 properties (80.0%).

This trend toward incorporation intensifies in the 21-50 property tier, where companies own 28 of the 30 properties, a commanding 93.3% share.

This pattern indicates that while individuals can easily start and manage small portfolios, scaling beyond 10 properties in Brown County typically involves formalizing the business into a corporate entity for liability and financial purposes.

Despite the corporate dominance at higher tiers, individuals still maintain a presence, owning 20.0% of properties in the 11-20 tier, showing that personal ownership remains a viable strategy even for larger local portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated in zip codes 66434 (304 properties) and 66439 (226 properties).
Detailed Findings

The majority of investor activity is geographically focused, with just two zip codes—66434 (Hiawatha) and 66439 (Horton)—accounting for 530 properties, or 71.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Brown County.

Certain sub-markets show extremely high investor penetration, led by zip code 66094 (White Cloud), where investors own a 51.6% majority of the local SFR housing stock.

A clear pattern of high concentration exists across the county, with four different zip codes (66094, 66439, 66515, 66424) all reporting investor ownership rates greater than 30%.

There is a notable difference between leadership in volume versus rate. While 66434 has the highest count of investor properties (304), its ownership rate of 20.3% is lower than several smaller zip codes.

This geographic analysis pinpoints specific communities where rental housing is a dominant component of the local real estate landscape, far exceeding the county-wide average.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.75 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Brown County are in a clear accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position. Throughout 2025, they purchased 27 properties while selling only 4, a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.75 to 1.

This strategy of portfolio growth is not new, as it mirrors the activity from 2024, when landlords acquired 25 properties and divested only 4, showcasing sustained confidence in the local market.

The consistent net-positive absorption of housing stock by investors indicates a bullish long-term outlook on rental demand and property values in the area.

Even the market's single institutional-scale investor is expanding its local holdings, with a net-positive transaction record of 2 purchases and 1 sale in 2025.

The data unequivocally shows that the investor community, from the smallest individuals to the largest entity, is actively growing its presence in Brown County rather than liquidating.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a party to 16.9% of all SFR transactions in Q4, totaling 10 transactions.
Detailed Findings

In the final quarter of 2025, landlords participated in 10 of the 59 total SFR transactions, capturing a 16.9% share of all market activity.

A distinct pricing advantage for larger investors was evident in Q4. The large landlord tier (101-1000 properties) acquired properties for an average of $97,321.

In contrast, new single-property investors paid a premium, with an average transaction price of $119,168, which is 22.4% higher than what the larger, more experienced buyer paid.

The market demonstrated no internal trading among investors this quarter, as 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, suggesting all acquisitions came from traditional homeowners or other sellers.

Transaction volume was heavily skewed toward the smallest players, with single-property landlords responsible for 8 of the 10 total investor transactions (80.0%), reinforcing their role as the primary driver of market activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, Individual Landlords Dominate Brown County's Market, Owning 25.2% of All Homes
Holdings
Investors own 738 Single-Family Residential properties in Brown County, KS, representing 25.2% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (612 properties, 82.9%) compared to companies (128 properties, 17.3%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired property for 49.3% less than traditional homeowners, representing an average discount of $105,178 per property ($108,245 vs $213,423).
Activity
Landlords purchased 6 properties in Q4, accounting for 15.8% of all sales, with activity driven by the smallest investors as 8 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
The investor market is defined by small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 93.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but a clear crossover occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies assume 80.0% majority ownership.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 6.75x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (27 buys vs 4 sells), and the single institutional investor is also a net buyer (2 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The Single-Family Residential market in Brown County, KS is significantly shaped by investor activity, with landlords owning 738 homes, a full 25.2% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is not one of corporate consolidation but of widespread, small-scale ownership. Individual investors hold a commanding 82.9% of the rental portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 93.6% of all investor-owned homes, while large institutional capital is virtually non-existent at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior in Brown County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased properties at a staggering 49.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, indicating a focus on distressed or off-market opportunities. This activity is driven by the smallest players, with new and single-property landlords accounting for the vast majority of Q4 purchases. Furthermore, the investor community as a whole is in a strong accumulation phase, buying 6.75 properties for every one they sold in 2025.

The key takeaway for Brown County is that its housing market is heavily influenced by a deeply entrenched base of local, individual investors who are fueling rental supply. They are sophisticated buyers, consistently expanding their holdings at significant discounts. This dynamic suggests that rental housing is a critical and growing component of the local ecosystem, driven by grassroots investment rather than outside corporate interests. The high penetration rate and net-buyer status signal ongoing confidence and a long-term commitment to the local rental market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 05:04 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Brown (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Brown (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-brown/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.