Stevens (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Stevens (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Stevens (KS)
1,326
Total Investors in Stevens (KS)
546
Investor Owned SFR in Stevens (KS)
477(36.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
497
SFR Owned
399
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
49
SFR Owned
81
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 477 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Stevens County, KS: A Cash-Driven Investor Market Dominated by Mom-and-Pops Amid Zero Q4 Sales Activity
Investors own a significant 36.0% of the Single-Family Residential market in Stevens County, with a portfolio of 477 properties entirely purchased with cash. Ownership is overwhelmingly concentrated among small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (95.4%), with zero institutional presence. The market showed no sales activity in Q4 2025, indicating a stable, buy-and-hold environment with extremely low liquidity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 477 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 83.6% of the portfolio.
The entire investor portfolio of 477 properties is owned with cash, with zero properties recorded as financed. Of these, 466 properties (97.7%) are classified as rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No pricing comparison is possible as zero landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded in Q4 2025.
The absence of transaction data extends to the 2020-2023 period, where zero landlord acquisitions were recorded. This indicates a prolonged period of extremely low market sales velocity in Stevens County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025, as zero total SFR purchases were recorded.
The market inactivity was universal, with zero purchases made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and no acquisitions by institutional investors (Tier 09). No new landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the largest group, owning 318 properties or 64.2% of the investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every active tier, holding over 78% even in larger portfolios.
There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In the single-property tier, individuals own 89.3% of the assets, a pattern that persists across all portfolio sizes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 67951 with 404 properties, but 67952 has the highest penetration at 62.4%.
The market demonstrates a clear distinction between the hub of investor activity by volume (67951) and the area most saturated by investor ownership percentage (67952).
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of landlord net buyer/seller status or market liquidity.
The absence of buy/sell records means it is impossible to calculate landlord-to-landlord transaction rates or compare average buy and sell prices to infer margins.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of Q4 transactions, as the county's SFR market recorded zero sales.
The absence of transactions was market-wide, affecting all investor tiers equally. Consequently, no analysis of Q4 pricing strategies or inter-landlord trading is possible.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 477 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding 83.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 36.0% of the total Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Stevens County, with a portfolio of 477 properties out of 1,326 total.

Individual 'mom-and-pop' investors are the definitive owners in this market, controlling 399 properties, which accounts for 83.6% of the investor-owned housing stock. Company investors own the remaining 81 properties (17.0%).

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash. All 477 investor-owned properties were acquired without financing, signaling a market composed of debt-free assets and investors who do not rely on leverage.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards generating rental income, with 466 properties (97.7%) identified as rented. This high rental concentration underscores the primary strategy of local investors.

While individual landlords are more numerous (497 entities), company landlords (49 entities) own a larger average portfolio, holding 81 properties compared to the 399 properties spread across a larger base of individuals.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No pricing comparison is possible as zero landlord or homeowner transactions were recorded in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

A comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners cannot be performed for Q4 2025 due to a complete absence of recorded sales transactions for either group during the period.

The lack of recent market activity is not a new phenomenon; data for the 2020-2023 timeframe also shows zero recorded property acquisitions by landlords, making long-term price trend analysis impossible.

This absence of data is a key insight into the nature of the Stevens County real estate market, pointing towards an environment with extremely low liquidity and turnover.

Investors and homeowners in this area appear to operate on a buy-and-hold basis, with very few properties changing hands on the open market in recent years.

Consequently, it is not possible to determine if a price gap exists between landlords and homeowners or to analyze appreciation trends, as the necessary transaction data is unavailable.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords acquired 0.0% of the market in Q4 2025, as zero total SFR purchases were recorded.
Detailed Findings

The investor share of the Q4 2025 purchase market was 0.0%, reflecting a complete halt in sales activity across Stevens County, where total SFR purchases were zero.

This market freeze was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who constitute the vast majority of owners, made no new acquisitions.

Similarly, institutional investors, who have no existing presence in the county, did not enter the market, recording zero purchases in Q4.

The lack of Tier 01 (single-property) purchases indicates that no new landlords entered the Stevens County market during the fourth quarter.

This data suggests a deeply stable or stagnant market where assets are rarely traded, and new investment activity was nonexistent in the final quarter of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Stevens County is completely dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning between 1 and 10 properties, control 95.4% of all investor-owned SFR housing.

First-time or single-holding investors (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 318 properties, a 64.2% share of the total investor portfolio.

Mid-size landlords (11-50 properties) represent a very small fraction of the market, holding a combined 4.6% of properties.

The market has no presence from large-scale or institutional investors (Tier 09), underscoring its character as a purely local, small-investor environment.

Due to the lack of recent transactions, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices may vary by tier or whether ownership distribution has shifted over time.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every active tier, holding over 78% even in larger portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly control portfolios of all sizes in Stevens County, with no tier showing a majority ownership by companies.

In the foundational single-property (Tier 01) category, individuals own 284 properties (89.3%), compared to just 34 properties (10.7%) owned by companies.

This pattern of individual dominance continues up the scale. For landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals own 85.4%, and even in the largest active segment (6-10 properties), they still hold a 78.6% majority.

The data clearly shows that as portfolio sizes increase in Stevens County, ownership remains firmly in the hands of individual investors rather than shifting towards corporate structures.

Pricing differences between individual and company buyers cannot be assessed, as the lack of transaction data prevents any meaningful comparison of acquisition strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 67951 with 404 properties, but 67952 has the highest penetration at 62.4%.
Detailed Findings

The majority of investor-owned properties in Stevens County are located in a single zip code, 67951, which contains 404 SFR properties held by investors.

However, the highest concentration of investor ownership is found in zip code 67952, where landlords own 62.4% of the housing stock. This indicates a market far more defined by rental properties than any other in the county.

This contrast reveals two different types of investor markets within the county: one with a high volume of investor properties (67951) and another with an extremely high saturation rate (67952).

The 33.4% ownership rate in the highest-volume zip code (67951) is still significant, well above national averages and indicating widespread investor presence.

The data for zip code 67954 was not available, preventing a complete geographic analysis of the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, preventing analysis of landlord net buyer/seller status or market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Stevens County makes it impossible to analyze long-term investor behavior, including buying and selling trends.

There is no data to determine whether landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers, a key indicator of market sentiment and growth.

Analysis of inter-landlord trading is also not possible. The data cannot reveal what percentage of transactions occur between investors, which would otherwise provide insight into market liquidity and dynamism.

Similarly, a comparison of average buy prices versus sell prices over time cannot be conducted, precluding any analysis of potential profit margins or asset appreciation for investors.

This data gap strongly suggests a market characterized by very long holding periods and infrequent sales, consistent with the findings of zero recent activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of Q4 transactions, as the county's SFR market recorded zero sales.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 0.0% of the market's 0 total transactions, indicating a complete pause in buying and selling activity.

This inactivity was uniform across all investor sizes, from single-property landlords (Tier 01) to the largest local operators, with none recording a purchase or sale.

As a result, it is impossible to compare the average purchase prices across different tiers, which would typically reveal varying investment strategies between small and larger landlords.

The percentage of properties bought from other landlords could not be calculated, as no acquisitions occurred from any source.

The Q4 transaction data reinforces the primary narrative of a dormant market where assets are held for the long term and sales are exceedingly rare.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors in Stevens County, KS command 36% of the SFR market with 100% cash, dominated by mom-and-pops amid a Q4 market standstill.
Holdings
Landlords own 477 Single-Family Residential properties in Stevens County, representing a significant 36.0% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (83.6%) compared to companies (17.0%).
Pricing
No pricing analysis is possible for Q4 2025, as zero transactions were recorded for either landlords or traditional homeowners, indicating a period of extremely low market liquidity.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw a complete halt in market activity, with landlords purchasing 0 properties, or 0.0% of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during this period.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control of the market, owning 95.4% of all investor-held housing, while institutional investors have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding over 78% of properties even in the largest portfolios. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in Stevens County.
Transactions
Due to a lack of historical and current transaction data, the net buyer/seller status for landlords cannot be determined. The Q4 2025 buy/sell ratio was zero, with no recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor market in Stevens County, Kansas is a unique, self-contained ecosystem defined by high penetration and local ownership. Investors control a substantial 477 properties, which constitutes 36.0% of the county's entire Single-Family Residential housing stock. This market is built on a foundation of small, individual investors, who own 83.6% of the rental portfolio. Reinforcing this structure, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) command an overwhelming 95.4% share, while institutional capital is entirely absent.

Investor behavior is characterized by stability and a lack of leverage. The entire 477-property portfolio is owned outright with cash, indicating a debt-averse and financially conservative approach. This buy-and-hold strategy was acutely evident in Q4 2025, which saw a complete market standstill with zero recorded sales transactions for landlords or homeowners. This lack of liquidity prevents any analysis of pricing advantages or recent market trends, as the data reflects a dormant transactional environment.

The key takeaway from Stevens County is a portrait of a classic rural rental market: highly penetrated by local, cash-rich investors who rarely sell. The absence of transactions is not a sign of distress but rather of extreme stability. For residents, this means a rental market controlled by small, local landlords, not distant corporations. For potential new investors, it signals a market with very high barriers to entry due to the lack of available properties for sale.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 06:24 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Stevens (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Stevens (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-stevens/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.