Lewis (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lewis (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lewis (ID)
1,099
Total Investors in Lewis (ID)
290
Investor Owned SFR in Lewis (ID)
228(20.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
260
SFR Owned
193
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
30
SFR Owned
40
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 228 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lewis County's Market, Owning 20.7% of All Single-Family Homes
Investors own 228 single-family homes in Lewis County, ID, representing 20.7% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold 98.8% of the investor-owned housing stock. In Q4 2025, investors were highly active, purchasing 50.0% of all homes sold and demonstrating strong accumulation as net buyers throughout the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 228 homes in Lewis County, with individuals comprising 84.6% of all holdings.
The majority of investor-owned properties, 161 (70.6%), are held free and clear as cash properties, compared to just 67 (29.4%) that are financed. The market consists of 290 distinct landlords, 260 of whom are individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a striking Q4 reversal, landlords paid a 47.9% premium over traditional homeowners.
This Q4 premium of $72,618 per property ($224,215 vs. $151,597) marks a dramatic shift from the deep discounts seen in the prior two quarters, which were as high as 50.7% in Q1 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 50.0% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords were exclusively active, accounting for 100.0% of all investor purchases, with zero activity from institutional-scale investors. The quarter saw the emergence of 4 new single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.8% of investor-owned homes in Lewis County.
Single-property landlords alone own 67.1% of all investor-held SFRs, totaling 165 properties. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors form the backbone of every ownership tier, including a 50.0% share in the 6-10 property tier.
Companies do not achieve majority ownership at any tier size in Lewis County. Individual ownership is highest in the two-property tier at 88.6%.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83536 zip code holding 106 investor-owned properties.
The 83545 zip code has the highest investor penetration rate at 33.3%. Four of the top five zip codes by ownership rate exceed 20% investor ownership.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Lewis County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.33 homes for every one they sold in 2024.
The net buying trend continued strongly into 2025, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 5.33 (16 properties bought vs. 3 sold). There is no recorded transaction activity from institutional investors.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord-involved transactions accounted for 50.0% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
All 5 landlord transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors, with zero deals involving institutional players. None of the landlord purchases in Q4 were sourced from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 228 homes in Lewis County, with individuals comprising 84.6% of all holdings.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 20.7% share of the single-family residential market in Lewis County, with a total portfolio of 228 properties out of 1,099 total SFRs.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the local market, owning 193 properties, which accounts for 84.6% of all investor-owned homes, compared to the 40 properties (17.5%) owned by companies.

A strong preference for all-cash ownership is evident, with 161 properties (70.6% of the portfolio) held without financing, suggesting a well-capitalized and lower-risk investor base.

The investor landscape is composed of 290 unique landlords, where individuals vastly outnumber companies with 260 entities compared to just 30 corporate entities, reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the market.

Of the investor-owned portfolio, 219 properties are confirmed as rented, indicating a primary focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a striking Q4 reversal, landlords paid a 47.9% premium over traditional homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing behavior saw a dramatic price reversal in Q4 2025, with landlords paying an average of $224,215, a 47.9% premium over the $151,597 paid by traditional homeowners.

This Q4 activity stands in stark contrast to the rest of the year, where landlords consistently secured properties at a discount, including a significant 50.1% discount in Q3 ($159,600 vs. $320,016) and a 50.7% discount in Q1 ($154,580 vs. $313,771).

The sharp volatility in the price gap, swinging from a $160,416 discount in Q3 to a $72,618 premium in Q4, suggests highly variable market conditions or a shift in the type of properties being acquired by investors.

Overall price appreciation for landlord-acquired properties shows a slight increase, with the average price in 2025 at $205,407, up from $192,983 in 2024.

The pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $199,505 indicates that recent acquisition prices in 2025 remain elevated compared to the boom years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 50.0% of all single-family home purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 3 of the 6 total single-family homes sold in Lewis County, capturing a dominant 50.0% market share.

The small, local investor is the engine of market activity, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions this quarter.

Market entry for new investors was strong, with 4 new single-property entities making their first purchase, acquiring 3 properties and representing 75.0% of landlord buying volume.

Mid-size and institutional investors were completely absent from the purchasing landscape, with 0 properties acquired by landlords with portfolios larger than 10 homes.

Activity was concentrated at the smallest scale, with single-property landlords (3 properties) and two-property landlords (1 property) making up the entirety of Q4 acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a commanding 98.8% of investor-owned homes in Lewis County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Lewis County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 98.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors form the bedrock of the market, as the single-property tier alone accounts for 165 properties, a 67.1% share of the total investor portfolio.

Ownership concentration rapidly decreases with scale; two-property landlords hold a 17.1% share (42 properties), while landlords with 3-5 properties hold 13.8% (34 properties).

The market shows a near-total absence of large-scale investors, with no properties held by entities in the mid-to-large tiers (51-1000 properties) and a 0.0% share for institutional investors (1,000+ properties).

This distribution highlights a market structure defined by local, small-scale investment rather than large corporate ownership, challenging broad narratives about institutional dominance.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors form the backbone of every ownership tier, including a 50.0% share in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the primary owners across every single portfolio size in Lewis County, demonstrating their foundational role in the local rental market.

Unlike larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; individuals maintain a substantial presence even in larger small-scale portfolios, holding a 50.0% share of properties in the 6-10 unit tier.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found among two-property landlords, where individuals own 39 of 44 properties (88.6%).

Company ownership, while a minority, is most concentrated in the 3-5 property tier, where they own 12 properties for a 35.3% share, their highest penetration level in the market.

The data shows a clear pattern: as portfolio sizes increase, company participation grows, but it never surpasses the level of individual investment in Lewis County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 83536 zip code holding 106 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic concentration is a key feature of investor ownership in Lewis County, with the top five zip codes by count holding the vast majority of all investor-owned properties.

The zip code 83536 is the epicenter of investor holdings, with 106 properties, representing 25.9% of that area's housing stock.

High investor penetration rates are common in specific areas, led by the 83545 zip code where investors own 33.3% of homes. The 83536 (25.9%), 83555 (25.8%), and 83524 (21.1%) zip codes also show significant investor presence.

The top regions by sheer count and by ownership percentage overlap significantly, indicating that investors are targeting the same core areas within the county.

Two zip codes, 83543 and 83555, each contain exactly 40 investor-owned properties, highlighting pockets of focused investment activity.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Lewis County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 8.33 homes for every one they sold in 2024.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data reveals a clear and sustained trend of portfolio accumulation among landlords in Lewis County.

In 2024, landlords were exceptionally strong net buyers, purchasing 25 properties while only selling 3, resulting in a net gain of 22 properties and an 8.33x buy-to-sell ratio.

This aggressive acquisition strategy has carried into 2025, with landlords buying 16 properties and selling only 3, for a net increase of 13 properties and a 5.33x buy-to-sell ratio.

The most recent quarter (Q3 2025) continued this pattern, with 4 properties purchased against 2 sold, confirming the ongoing strategy of growth.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have recorded no buy or sell transactions, indicating their activity is non-existent and all market dynamics are driven by smaller investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord-involved transactions accounted for 50.0% of all market activity in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a central role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 5 out of the 10 total transactions, for a 50.0% share of all activity.

The market's transaction volume is entirely driven by smaller investors, with 100% of landlord activity (5 transactions) coming from mom-and-pop tiers.

First-time investors were the most active, with single-property landlords conducting 4 transactions at an average purchase price of $217,759.

There was no inter-landlord trading this quarter, as 0.0% of properties purchased by investors were acquired from other landlords, suggesting investors are buying from homeowners or new construction.

A notable price difference emerged between the smallest tiers, with two-property landlords paying an average of $250,040, which is $32,281 more than the average price paid by single-property landlords ($217,759).

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 20.7% of Lewis County's housing market and drove 50.0% of Q4 sales.
Holdings
Investors own 228 single-family residential properties in Lewis County, ID, representing 20.7% of the market. Individual investors dominate, holding 193 of these properties (84.6%), while companies own the remaining 40 (17.5%).
Pricing
In a significant Q4 market shift, landlords paid a 47.9% premium over homeowners, with an average price of $224,215 versus $151,597, reversing a trend of deep discounts from earlier in the year.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4, purchasing 3 properties which accounted for 50.0% of all market sales. All acquisitions were made by mom-and-pop investors, including 4 new landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 98.8% of all investor-held housing. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero ownership share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with companies only reaching a 50.0% parity in the small 6-10 property tier and never surpassing individuals.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring 16 properties while selling only 3 in 2025 (a 5.33x ratio). Institutional investors are completely inactive, with zero recorded buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Lewis County, ID is significantly shaped by small, local investors. They own 228 properties, a 20.7% share of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is defined not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 84.6% of the investor-held homes. The market structure is overwhelmingly grassroots, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 98.8% of the investor portfolio, while institutional investors have no presence.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was aggressive and decisive. Landlords captured 50.0% of all home sales, with all activity originating from mom-and-pop buyers. This high level of activity came with a surprising pricing strategy; after a year of securing deep discounts, landlords paid a sharp 47.9% premium over traditional homeowners in the final quarter. Transaction data confirms a long-term trend of accumulation, with landlords acting as strong net buyers, purchasing 5.33 homes for every one sold throughout 2025.

The key takeaway for Lewis County is the deeply embedded and dominant role of the small, local landlord. This group is not only the primary provider of rental housing but is also actively shaping market dynamics through a high volume of purchases and a clear strategy of portfolio growth. The absence of institutional players and the reliance on individual capital creates a market distinct from national trends, driven by local economic conditions and the investment decisions of community-level participants.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:57 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Lewis (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Lewis (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-lewis/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.