Franklin (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (ID)
4,775
Total Investors in Franklin (ID)
602
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (ID)
508(10.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
436
SFR Owned
304
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
166
SFR Owned
222
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 508 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Franklin County's Real Estate Market with 98.7% Ownership, Acquiring Properties at a 37% Q4 Discount
In Franklin County, ID, investors own 508 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 10.6% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (98.7%), with institutional investors holding no properties. In Q4 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at a significant 36.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 508 SFRs (10.6% of the market), with individuals holding a 59.8% majority.
Cash is the dominant acquisition method, outnumbering financed properties 4-to-1 (407 vs 101). The vast majority of the portfolio (96.5%) is actively rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income. Individuals comprise the bulk of landlords by count (436 of 602), but companies hold larger average portfolios.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 36.6% discount in Q4, paying $172,665 less than homeowners.
This Q4 discount ($299,404 vs $472,069) marks a dramatic reversal from the prior three quarters, where landlords paid significant premiums over homeowners, peaking at 165.1% in Q1. This volatility suggests opportunistic buying rather than a consistent pricing strategy.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 16.7% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove nearly all investor activity, accounting for 10 of the 11 properties purchased (90.9%). In stark contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market saw an influx of 11 new single-property landlords.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors have zero presence in this market, holding 0.0% of the properties. The foundation of the rental market is the single-property landlord, with this tier alone accounting for 365 properties, a remarkable 70.1% of the entire investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the two-property tier, holding 65.1% of homes.
While individuals dominate the single-property tier (70.0%), companies take control of most mid-size portfolios. Unexpectedly, individuals reclaim a 60.0% majority in the 11-20 property tier, a departure from typical market structures.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 83263 zip code holding 72.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
The 83263 zip code contains 370 investor properties. However, the 83241 zip code has the highest market penetration, where investors own a staggering 75.0% of all single-family homes. All top five zip codes by count have investor ownership rates above 8.8%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4, acquiring 8.5 properties for every one sold.
This strong accumulation trend is not new, as investors have been consistent net buyers for the past two years, with a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.8x for all of 2025 and 3.7x in 2024. Institutional investors recorded zero transactions, remaining entirely on the sidelines.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 17 deals.
New, single-property landlords drove the bulk of activity, accounting for 11 of the 17 transactions and paying an average price of $306,013. Only one transaction (5.9%) was a landlord-to-landlord sale, showing a clear focus on acquiring properties from the general homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 508 SFRs (10.6% of the market), with individuals holding a 59.8% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant stake in Franklin County's housing market, owning 508 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 10.6% of the total 4,775 SFRs in the area.

Ownership is skewed towards individual investors, who control 304 properties (59.8% of the investor portfolio), compared to companies which own 222 properties (43.7%).

When looking at landlord entities, individuals represent the vast majority, with 436 individual landlords compared to 166 company landlords. This 2.6-to-1 ratio highlights that the market is primarily composed of smaller, private investors rather than large corporations.

Cash is overwhelmingly the preferred method of acquisition for landlords in this market. Cash-owned properties (407) far outnumber financed ones (101), revealing that most investors are not highly leveraged.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental use, with 490 of the 508 investor-owned properties classified as rented. This 96.5% rental rate underscores a strong, active strategy of providing housing supply to the rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 36.6% discount in Q4, paying $172,665 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rate, paying an average of $299,404. This was a substantial 36.6% less than the $472,069 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a $172,665 discount per property.

This deep discount is a stark reversal of a year-long trend. In the first three quarters of 2025, landlords consistently paid premiums. The trend shifted from a 165.1% premium in Q1 to a 28.5% premium in Q3, before collapsing into the Q4 discount, indicating highly volatile and opportunistic purchasing behavior.

The price paid by landlords in Q4 ($299,404) represents a significant drop from the prices they were paying earlier in the year, such as the $560,190 average in Q3 and an anomalous $1,184,232 in Q1.

Comparing prices to the pandemic era (2020-2023 average of $438,836), the Q4 2025 landlord acquisition price is notably lower, suggesting a market correction or a strategic shift towards purchasing lower-cost assets.

The wide and fluctuating gap between landlord and homeowner prices—from a $737,477 landlord premium in Q1 to a $172,665 landlord discount in Q4—signals an inefficient market where savvy investors can find significant value, while other periods see them paying top dollar for specific assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 16.7% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 11 of the 66 total SFRs sold, capturing a 16.7% market share of all transactions.

The buying activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired 10 properties, representing 90.9% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

First-time investors made a strong showing, with the single-property tier being the most active. This group, comprising 11 distinct entities, purchased 7 properties, accounting for 53.8% of all investor acquisitions in Q4.

Mid-size and institutional investors were largely absent from the market. Landlords with portfolios over 10 properties acquired only 3 homes, while large institutional investors (1,000+ properties) made no purchases at all.

The data reveals a grassroots expansion of the rental market, characterized by new entrants and small landlords growing their portfolios, rather than consolidation by large corporate players.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 98.7% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Franklin County is definitively controlled by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) hold a combined 98.7% of all investor-owned SFRs, illustrating a highly decentralized market structure.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental housing supply, owning 365 properties. This represents 70.1% of the total investor portfolio, emphasizing the critical role of first-time and small investors.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in this market, with 0.0% ownership. This absence underscores the local, non-corporate nature of real estate investment in the county.

The distribution is heavily weighted towards the smallest tiers. Following single-property owners, landlords with 3-5 properties hold the next largest share at 13.4%, while those with 6-10 properties own 6.9%.

Mid-size investors (11-50 properties) represent a very small fraction of the market, collectively owning just 7 properties or 1.4% of the total investor portfolio, further cementing the dominance of small landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the two-property tier, holding 65.1% of homes.
Detailed Findings

While individuals make up the majority of single-property landlords (70.0%), the transition to corporate ownership happens swiftly. Companies become the majority holders at the two-property tier, owning 28 of the 43 properties (65.1%).

Company dominance solidifies in slightly larger portfolios. In the 6-10 property tier, companies own 35 properties, an overwhelming 85.4% share, indicating a clear strategy for professionalizing ownership as portfolios grow.

An unusual pattern emerges in the 11-20 property tier, where individuals unexpectedly reclaim the majority with 60.0% ownership. This anomaly suggests that a few larger individual investors are active, bucking the trend of increasing corporate ownership with scale.

The single-property tier is the primary stronghold for individual investors, with 261 of the 365 properties held by individuals. This highlights the entry point for most landlords is personal, not corporate.

Across all tiers, individual investors own 304 properties while companies own 222. However, the tier-by-tier data reveals a clear strategic divergence: individuals dominate the entry-level, while companies control the established small-to-mid-size segment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 83263 zip code holding 72.8% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Real estate investment in Franklin County is geographically concentrated to an extreme degree. A single zip code, 83263, is home to 370 investor-owned properties, which accounts for 72.8% of the entire county's investor portfolio of 508 properties.

While 83263 leads in sheer volume, the 83241 zip code shows the highest level of market saturation. In this area, investors own 75.0% of the single-family housing stock, indicating a market dominated by rental properties.

There is a clear distinction between the leader in volume and the leader in penetration rate. The second-most-owned zip code, 83237, has only 51 investor properties, highlighting the massive gap between the primary investment zone and secondary markets.

High investor ownership is a common theme across the top sub-geographies. The top five areas by investor property count all exhibit ownership rates exceeding 8.8%, well above typical national averages.

The top five zip codes by percentage are led by 83241 (75.0%) and 83228 (13.5%), revealing pockets of exceptionally high investor concentration outside of the main volume hub of 83263 (10.7%).

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were aggressive net buyers in Q4, acquiring 8.5 properties for every one sold.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County are in a strong accumulation phase, acting as decisive net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 17 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a buy-to-sell ratio of 8.5x and a net gain of 15 properties.

This aggressive buying posture in Q4 reflects an acceleration of a multi-year trend. For the full year 2025, landlords maintained a 4.8x buy-to-sell ratio (48 buys vs. 10 sells), which was an increase from the 3.7x ratio in 2024 (52 buys vs. 14 sells).

The transaction data shows a consistent strategy of portfolio expansion across the market, with buying activity consistently outpacing selling activity quarter after quarter.

Transaction volume has remained relatively steady over the past two years, with 48 purchases in 2025 and 52 in 2024, indicating a stable and ongoing appetite for acquisitions.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded in any tracked timeframe. This reinforces that all market transaction dynamics are being driven by smaller, local landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.5% of all property transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 17 deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 17 of the 103 total SFR transactions in Franklin County, giving them a 16.5% share of all market activity.

The vast majority of this activity came from the smallest investors. The single-property tier alone was responsible for 11 transactions, representing 64.7% of all landlord deals. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively made up 14 of the 17 transactions.

New entrants into the market paid an average of $306,013 per property, establishing a baseline acquisition cost for first-time investors during the quarter.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only one transaction sourced from another landlord. This occurred in the 6-10 property tier. This low rate (5.9%) indicates that investors are primarily adding to the overall rental stock by purchasing from homeowners, rather than trading assets among themselves.

Institutional investors logged zero transactions, continuing their pattern of inactivity and ceding the entire market to smaller players who are actively buying.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Franklin County with 98.7% ownership, acquiring properties at a 37% discount while institutions remain absent.
Holdings
In Franklin County, ID, landlords own 508 SFR properties, representing 10.6% of the market. The portfolio is primarily held by individual investors, who own 304 properties (59.8%), while companies own the remaining 222 (43.7%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4 2025, paying 36.6% less than traditional homeowners. This amounted to a $172,665 average discount per property ($299,404 for landlords vs. $472,069 for homeowners).
Activity
Investors purchased 16.7% of homes sold in Q4 (11 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords. The quarter saw the entrance of 11 new single-property landlords, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions.
Market Share
The rental market is defined by small-scale ownership, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.7% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
While individuals dominate the entry-level tier, companies become the majority owners very early, starting at the two-property portfolio size. Companies strengthen their hold in the 3-10 property range, controlling over 85% of that segment.
Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, operating as net buyers with an 8.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (17 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors are entirely inactive, recording zero buy or sell transactions.
Market Narrative

In Franklin County, Idaho, the single-family rental market is fundamentally a local, small-investor enterprise. Landlords own 508 SFR properties, or 10.6% of the total housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 98.7% of the investor-owned portfolio, while large institutional investors have zero presence. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals (59.8%), though companies quickly become the majority holders in portfolios of two or more properties, signaling a trend toward professionalization with scale.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive and opportunistic acquisition. Landlords acted as strong net buyers, purchasing 8.5 properties for every one they sold and capturing 16.7% of all market sales. They demonstrated remarkable purchasing leverage, securing homes for 36.6% less than traditional homeowners—an average discount of $172,665. This activity was driven by new and existing small landlords, with 11 new single-property investors entering the market, while institutional players remained completely on the sidelines.

The key takeaway from Franklin County is a story of a decentralized and resilient rental market powered by community-level investment. The absence of corporate giants, coupled with the dominance of small landlords who are actively expanding their holdings at a discount, suggests a market where local knowledge and deal-finding outweigh large-scale capital. This dynamic indicates a stable and growing supply of rental housing provided not by Wall Street, but by local individuals and small businesses investing directly in their community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:51 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Franklin (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Franklin (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-franklin/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.