Camas (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Camas (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Camas (ID)
890
Total Investors in Camas (ID)
945
Investor Owned SFR in Camas (ID)
703(79.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
857
SFR Owned
627
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
88
SFR Owned
93
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 703 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Camas County with 79% SFR Market Share, Acquiring Properties at a 50% Discount
Investors own 703 single-family residential properties, a staggering 79.0% of the market in Camas County, ID. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.6%), with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.3%. In Q4, landlords were highly active, purchasing 66.7% of all homes sold and operating as strong net buyers throughout the year.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 703 SFRs, 79.0% of the market, with individuals holding 89.2% of the portfolio.
Cash-backed ownership is prevalent, with 532 properties owned outright compared to 171 that are financed. All 703 investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals, indicating a 100% non-owner-occupied portfolio. The market consists of 945 distinct landlords, with individuals comprising 857 of them.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 50.7% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025, paying $409,650 less per property.
The only available direct comparison in 2025 shows landlords paying an average of $398,850 while traditional homeowners paid $808,500. Pricing for landlords has been volatile, with average acquisition prices in 2025 ranging from $220,774 to $463,891 depending on the quarter.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 66.7% of all single-family homes sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100% of these investor acquisitions. New, single-property landlords were the most active group, acquiring 7 of the 8 properties (87.5%) purchased by investors. No institutional investors purchased property in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.6% of investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone owning 583 properties for a 78.0% share. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the investor-owned portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies gain a majority.
Individuals own 89.5% of all single-property landlord portfolios (535 properties). Even in the small 6-10 property tier, individuals maintain a 60.0% majority. Corporate ownership peaks at just 40.0% in that same tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 83327 zip code, with 655 properties and a 79.4% ownership rate.
The top regions by investor ownership percentage are 83327 (79.4%), 83337 (75.0%), and 83322 (73.8%). These high rates across multiple zip codes indicate that high investor concentration is a county-wide phenomenon.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
In 2025, landlords purchased 54 properties while selling only 3, demonstrating strong portfolio growth. This follows a similar pattern from 2024, when they bought 32 and sold only 4. Even the small institutional segment is in growth mode, with 3 buys and 1 sell in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 76.5% of all property transactions in Q4, participating in 13 of the 17 total market deals.
Mom-and-pop investors were solely responsible for this activity, conducting 100% of landlord transactions. Single-property investors paid an average price of $463,891, and 0% of their purchases came from other landlords, indicating they are expanding the rental supply.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 703 SFRs, 79.0% of the market, with individuals holding 89.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Camas County is exceptionally high, with landlords controlling 703 of the 890 single-family properties, a market penetration of 79.0%.

The investor landscape is defined by individual ownership, as individuals own 627 properties (89.2%) compared to the 93 properties (13.2%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord count, where 857 of the 945 total landlords (90.7%) are individuals rather than corporate entities.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with cash-owned properties (532) outnumbering financed ones (171) by more than a 3-to-1 ratio, suggesting a well-capitalized investor base.

The entire investor-owned portfolio of 703 homes is classified as rented, confirming that investment activity is purely focused on providing rental housing rather than speculation or secondary homes.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 50.7% discount compared to homeowners in Q1 2025, paying $409,650 less per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors demonstrate a significant pricing advantage, securing a 50.7% discount against traditional homeowners in Q1 2025, which translates to a savings of $409,650 on the average purchase.

This pricing gap highlights a stark difference in acquisition strategy or ability, with landlords paying $398,850 while homeowners paid an average of $808,500 in the same period.

While homeowner comparison data is limited, overall landlord acquisition prices show a clear upward trend, rising from a 2020-2023 average of $244,754 to an average of $380,730 for the full year of 2025.

The average purchase price for landlords in Q4 2025 was $463,891, the highest recorded quarterly average, though no direct homeowner comparison was available for that period.

The substantial discount suggests landlords in Camas County are adept at finding off-market deals, purchasing properties requiring renovations, or capitalizing on opportunities unavailable to typical homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, purchasing 66.7% of all single-family homes sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary buyers in the Camas County market in Q4, acquiring 8 of the 12 total SFRs sold for a 66.7% market share.

The quarter's activity was driven entirely by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 100% of all landlord purchases.

New entrants are a significant force, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone bought 7 properties, representing 87.5% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

This activity brought 11 new landlord entities into the market, signaling strong grassroots growth in the local rental sector.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive, making zero purchases in Q4 and underscoring the market's small-investor character.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control, owning 99.6% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Camas County is unequivocally controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The foundation of this market is the single-property landlord, as this tier alone accounts for 583 properties, a commanding 78.0% of all investor-owned homes.

Mid-size landlords are almost non-existent, with the 11-20 property tier containing only a single property.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership is unsubstantiated here, as institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 2 homes in the entire county, representing a minuscule 0.3% share.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented market composed almost entirely of small, local investors rather than a consolidated one led by large firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, with no crossover point where companies gain a majority.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Camas County is characterized by individual investors, who constitute the majority across every single portfolio tier.

In the largest and most foundational tier of single-property owners, individuals hold 535 of the 598 properties, an overwhelming 89.5% share.

Unlike in larger markets, there is no crossover point where companies become the dominant owner type. Even in the highest local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 60.0% of the homes.

Company ownership is consistently a minority position, reaching its highest concentration of 40.0% in the 6-10 property tier, where they own just 2 of the 5 properties.

This data confirms that the rental market's structure is built on personal investment, not corporate strategies, at all levels of ownership found in the county.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 83327 zip code, with 655 properties and a 79.4% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

The vast majority of investor activity in Camas County is located within a single area, the 83327 zip code, which contains 655 investor-owned properties.

This geographic concentration is also a story of market penetration, as the 79.4% investor ownership rate in 83327 makes it the top zip code by both property count and percentage.

High investor ownership is not limited to one area. The top three zip codes, 83327 (79.4%), 83337 (75.0%), and 83322 (73.8%), all exhibit rates above 73%.

This pattern shows that rather than having isolated pockets of activity, the entire county is a high-density area for real estate investment.

The data points to a market where single-family homes are a primary source of rental housing across all major communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 18 properties for every one they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The transaction history reveals a clear trend of accumulation, with landlords operating as strong net buyers. In 2025, they added a net of 51 properties to their portfolios (54 buys vs. 3 sells).

This aggressive acquisition-to-disposition ratio of 18-to-1 in 2025 signals deep investor confidence in the Camas County real estate market.

The pattern of accumulation is not new, as 2024 also saw landlords as net buyers with an 8-to-1 buy/sell ratio (32 buys vs. 4 sells).

Even the institutional segment, despite its tiny footprint, is expanding its holdings, having purchased 3 properties and sold only 1 in 2025.

These trends indicate that the high level of investor ownership is not a static legacy issue but is actively being increased through consistent market acquisitions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 76.5% of all property transactions in Q4, participating in 13 of the 17 total market deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the dominant force in the Q4 market, being a party in 13 of the 17 total transactions, which amounts to a 76.5% share of all activity.

This market-moving activity was exclusively driven by small investors, as mom-and-pop tiers accounted for all 13 landlord transactions.

New entrants set the market price, with single-property investors conducting 11 transactions at an average purchase price of $463,891.

Notably, 0% of landlord purchases were sourced from other landlords, meaning investors acquired properties from homeowners or developers, thereby increasing the overall pool of rental housing.

The complete absence of institutional transactions further solidifies the conclusion that Camas County's real estate market dynamics are dictated by small, local investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors command 99.6% of landlord-owned housing in Camas County, driving 79% of the total SFR market.
Holdings
Landlords own 703 SFR properties, representing a massive 79.0% of the Camas County market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 627 properties (89.2%), compared to just 93 (13.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a remarkable display of purchasing power, landlords paid 50.7% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2025, securing an average discount of $409,650 per property ($398,850 vs $808,500).
Activity
Investors dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 66.7% of all homes sold (8 properties), with activity driven entirely by mom-and-pop landlords and the creation of 11 new single-property investor entities.
Market Share
The market is fundamentally a small-investor ecosystem, where mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.6% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a negligible 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio size, with no crossover point to corporate control; companies peak at just 40.0% ownership in the small 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring properties at an 18-to-1 ratio in 2025 (54 buys vs 3 sells). The small institutional segment is also a net buyer, signaling universal confidence in portfolio growth.
Market Narrative

The single-family housing market in Camas County, ID is defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration, with landlords owning 703 properties, a staggering 79.0% of the total market. This landscape defies the national narrative of corporate dominance. Instead, it is overwhelmingly controlled by 945 small, local investors. Individual owners hold 89.2% of the rental portfolio, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) command a near-total 99.6% share, while institutional firms own a mere 0.3%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and sharp pricing. In Q4, landlords purchased two-thirds of all homes sold, and throughout 2025, they operated as strong net buyers with an 18-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This activity is fueled by a significant pricing advantage; data from Q1 shows landlords paying 50.7% less than traditional homebuyers. This indicates a sophisticated approach to sourcing deals, likely from off-market or distressed properties, effectively shaping the price structure of the local market.

The key takeaway for Camas County is that its housing market is fundamentally a small-investor-driven rental ecosystem. The competition for housing is not from Wall Street but from local individuals expanding their portfolios. This high concentration suggests that single-family homes are the primary source of rental supply, and the market's health and direction are intrinsically tied to the financial stability and confidence of these hundreds of mom-and-pop operators who are actively and continuously growing their presence.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:49 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Camas (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Camas (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-camas/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.