Vanderburgh (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Vanderburgh (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Vanderburgh (IN)
57,734
Total Investors in Vanderburgh (IN)
5,129
Investor Owned SFR in Vanderburgh (IN)
8,006(13.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,772
SFR Owned
3,791
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,357
SFR Owned
4,281
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 8,006 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Vanderburgh County Investor Market Defined by Small Landlords and Deep Purchase Discounts
Investors own 8,006 SFRs in Vanderburgh County, 13.9% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 70.5% of this portfolio. In Q4, landlords purchased 14.6% of all homes sold, paying a remarkable 47.8% less than traditional homeowners. While the market remains in an accumulation phase with landlords acting as net buyers, institutional investors have a minimal presence, owning only 0.1% of investor-held properties.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Companies own 53.5% of Vanderburgh's 8,006 investor SFRs, surpassing individual investors.
The local investor market is heavily cash-based, with nearly three times as many properties owned outright (5,991) as are financed (2,015). The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 94.8% of investor-owned properties (7,591) being non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 47.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering discount of $132,229 per property.
This price advantage for landlords widened significantly from Q3, when the discount was 30.5% ($85,962). Landlord acquisition prices show high quarterly volatility, ranging from a high of $195,861 in Q3 2025 to a low of $127,964 in Q2 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 14.6% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominated investor activity, accounting for 64.2% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) acquired only 3 properties, making up just 2.4% of the investor buy-side.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 70.5% of Vanderburgh's investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio, or 11 properties. The single-property landlord tier is the largest segment by itself, holding 3,131 properties, which is 37.9% of the entire investor-owned stock.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for landlords with 6+ properties.
The shift to corporate ownership is stark in larger portfolios, with companies representing 94.1% of ownership in the 21-50 property tier. At the entry-level, individuals own a commanding 78.2% of all single-property investor homes (2,471 properties).
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 47714, holding 2,230 investor-owned properties.
The highest rate of investor ownership is in zip code 47713, where landlords own 33.8% of all SFRs. The areas with the highest property counts are not the same as those with the highest percentage, indicating different market dynamics across the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain consistent net buyers in Vanderburgh County, acquiring 145 properties while selling 129 in Q4.
This net acquisition of 16 properties in Q4 represents a significant slowdown from prior quarters, such as Q3 (net 71) and Q2 (net 72). Institutional investors mirrored this trend on a much smaller scale, remaining net buyers with 3 acquisitions versus 1 sale in Q4.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 12.3% of all Q4 SFR transactions, totaling 145 deals.
Single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $121,938, which is 8.5% more than the $111,542 paid by institutional investors. Two-property landlords sourced an overwhelming 71.4% of their purchases from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Companies own 53.5% of Vanderburgh's 8,006 investor SFRs, surpassing individual investors.
Detailed Findings

In Vanderburgh County, investors own 8,006 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 13.9% of the total 57,734 SFRs in the market.

A significant market feature is the prevalence of corporate ownership, with companies owning 4,281 properties (53.5%), narrowly surpassing the 3,791 properties (47.4%) held by individual investors. This indicates a professionalized investor landscape.

Despite companies owning more properties, individual landlords are far more numerous, with 3,772 individuals compared to 1,357 companies. This reveals that the average company portfolio is substantially larger than the average individual's.

Investor portfolios in the area are financed with cash at a high rate. A total of 5,991 properties are owned with cash, nearly triple the 2,015 that are financed, signaling low leverage and high equity among local landlords.

The vast majority of the investor portfolio is actively used for rental purposes. Of the 8,006 properties, 7,591 are classified as rented, a penetration rate of 94.8% that underscores the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 47.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering discount of $132,229 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Vanderburgh County demonstrate a powerful pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $144,447. This is 47.8% less than the $276,676 average paid by traditional homeowners, resulting in a cash discount of $132,229 on a typical purchase.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been both substantial and volatile. The 47.8% discount in Q4 marks a significant widening from the 30.5% discount observed in Q3, although it is less than the 56.4% gap seen in Q2.

While homeowner prices have remained relatively stable, landlord acquisition prices fluctuate dramatically by quarter. Prices swung from $195,861 in Q3 to $144,447 in Q4, a 26.3% decrease in just one quarter, suggesting investors are highly opportunistic.

Over a longer horizon, acquisition prices have appreciated steadily. The average landlord purchase price of $122,497 in 2024 is up from the $108,683 average during the 2020-2023 pandemic era, reflecting underlying market growth.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 14.6% of all single-family homes sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a significant portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 122 of the 834 total SFRs sold, a market share of 14.6%.

The acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 79 purchases, representing 64.2% of all investor buying activity.

In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact, acquiring just 3 homes, or 2.4% of the investor total. This highlights a market dominated by local and small operators, not large corporations.

The market saw a healthy influx of new participants, as 40 new landlord entities entered the market by purchasing their first investment property. This group alone accounted for 33 property purchases, 26.8% of the investor total.

Purchasing was distributed across several small and mid-sized tiers, with single-property buyers (33 properties), small landlords with 3-5 properties (24 properties), and investors with 21-50 properties (20 properties) showing the most activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 70.5% of Vanderburgh's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Vanderburgh County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 70.5% of all investor-owned SFR housing, making them the foundation of the local rental market.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000 or more properties own a mere 11 homes, representing just 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.

First-time or single-property landlords represent the largest single bloc of ownership. This group holds 3,131 properties, accounting for 37.9% of all investor-owned SFRs, demonstrating the decentralized nature of the market.

Ownership concentration steadily declines as portfolio size increases. After the mom-and-pop category, mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) control 28.4% of the market, reinforcing the theme of a market built on small to medium-sized enterprises.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for landlords with 6+ properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear professionalization trend emerges when analyzing ownership by portfolio size. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, holding 67.1% of properties in that segment.

Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios. They own 78.2% of single-property holdings and 64.3% of two-property holdings, indicating that most landlords start their journey as individual operators.

The transition to a corporate structure accelerates rapidly with scale. After the crossover point, company ownership climbs to 84.1% in the 11-20 property tier and a near-total 94.1% in the 21-50 property tier.

The data suggests a distinct business lifecycle: investors typically begin as individuals and then incorporate into formal business entities as their portfolios grow beyond five properties to manage liability and operations more effectively.

Even in the smallest tier, a notable 21.8% of single-property landlords (688 properties) are owned by companies, showing that some investors choose a corporate structure from their very first purchase.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated in zip code 47714, holding 2,230 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Vanderburgh County is geographically concentrated in a few key areas. The zip code 47714 is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 2,230 investor-owned properties, which represents 20.1% of its local SFR market.

Following closely in terms of sheer count is 47711, where investors own 1,830 properties, making up 15.3% of that area's single-family homes.

However, the highest market penetration is found elsewhere. Zip code 47713 has the highest investor ownership rate at 33.8%, meaning one in every three SFRs is investor-owned. This is followed by 47708, with a rate of 33.3%.

This distinction between volume and rate leaders is critical. It shows that while some zip codes attract the most total investment, others are more deeply saturated by investor activity, which can have different impacts on the local housing and rental markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain consistent net buyers in Vanderburgh County, acquiring 145 properties while selling 129 in Q4.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Vanderburgh County continues to be in an accumulation phase. In Q4 2025, landlords were net buyers, purchasing 145 properties while selling only 129, for a net gain of 16 properties to their collective portfolio.

While still positive, the pace of acquisition has decelerated significantly. The net gain of 16 properties in Q4 is substantially lower than the 71 properties added in Q3 and the 72 added in Q2 of 2025, signaling a cooling of purchasing activity.

This trend holds true on an annual basis. In 2025, landlords added a net of 251 properties, down from a net gain of 367 properties in 2024, indicating a broader market slowdown in investor buying.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) are also net buyers but their activity is minimal. They added a net of 2 properties in Q4 (3 buys, 1 sell) and a net of 5 properties for the entire year, reinforcing their limited role in the market's expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 12.3% of all Q4 SFR transactions, totaling 145 deals.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 145 of the 1,175 total SFR transactions in Vanderburgh County, capturing a 12.3% share of market activity.

A clear pricing inversion exists between the smallest and largest investors. New or single-property landlords paid an average of $121,938 per home, 8.5% more than the $111,542 average price paid by institutional investors, suggesting larger players secure better pricing.

The most active buyers were mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 92 transactions, compared to just 3 transactions by institutional investors. This again underscores the dominance of small players in market liquidity.

Inter-landlord trading is a key source of inventory for certain segments. Investors in the two-property tier were especially reliant on this channel, acquiring 71.4% of their new properties from other landlords.

The highest prices were not paid by the smallest or largest investors, but by mid-sized players in the 21-50 property tier, who averaged $183,211 per purchase. This may indicate a strategy focused on acquiring higher-value or turnkey rental assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords dominate Vanderburgh's rental market, securing properties at a 48% discount to homeowners.
Holdings
In Vanderburgh County, investors own 8,006 SFR properties, representing 13.9% of the market. Corporate entities hold the majority with 4,281 properties (53.5%), while individual investors own the remaining 3,791 (47.4%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant buying power in Q4 2025, paying 47.8% less than homeowners with an average price of $144,447 versus $276,676, a raw discount of $132,229 per property.
Activity
Investors purchased 14.6% of all homes sold in Q4 (122 properties), with activity led by small operators and an influx of 40 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is fundamentally controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 70.5% of all investor-held SFRs, while institutional firms (1000+) control a mere 0.1%.
Ownership Type
A clear professionalization path exists where individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a landlord's portfolio grows to the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are in an accumulation phase, acting as net buyers in Q4 with 145 purchases versus 129 sales. Institutional investors are also net buyers, but their volume is negligible (3 buys vs. 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The investor market in Vanderburgh County, IN, is defined by local, small-to-medium-scale operations rather than large institutions. Investors own 8,006 single-family homes, comprising 13.9% of the total market. While corporate entities hold a slim majority of properties (53.5%), the landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 70.5% of the investor-owned housing stock. In contrast, institutional investors have a nearly nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio.

Investor behavior is characterized by sophisticated, value-oriented purchasing and steady accumulation. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 14.6% of all homes sold, driven by an influx of 40 new single-property investors. These buyers exhibit a powerful pricing advantage, securing properties at a 47.8% discount compared to traditional homeowners during the quarter. The market remains in a growth phase, with landlords collectively acting as net buyers, consistently adding more properties to their portfolios than they sell.

The key takeaway for the Vanderburgh housing market is that it is shaped by a decentralized network of professionalizing local investors. The critical dynamic is the transition from individual to corporate ownership as portfolios scale beyond five properties, indicating a maturing but still fragmented rental market. These investors are not passive but are active, opportunistic buyers who exert significant influence through their ability to find and purchase properties far below the typical retail price point.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 09:19 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Vanderburgh (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Vanderburgh (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-in-vanderburgh/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.