Bear Lake (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bear Lake (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bear Lake (ID)
3,238
Total Investors in Bear Lake (ID)
2,016
Investor Owned SFR in Bear Lake (ID)
1,644(50.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,760
SFR Owned
1,428
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
256
SFR Owned
269
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,644 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Investors Dominate Bear Lake County, Owning 50.8% of Homes and Paying Premiums
Landlords own 1,644 single-family homes in Bear Lake County, representing a majority 50.8% of the market. This market is defined by mom-and-pop investors, who control 98.7% of investor properties and are aggressive net buyers. Uniquely, these landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, while institutional investors remain entirely absent from the area.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,644 SFRs, over half the market, with individuals holding 86.9%.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 1,135 properties (69.0%) held free-and-clear compared to 509 financed properties. The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 1,635 of 1,644 properties (99.5%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $54,259 more per home.
This premium has narrowed significantly from prior quarters, where it reached an extraordinary 132.8% in Q3 and 96.8% in Q2. This signals a potential shift in purchasing strategy or market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 19 properties, a 67.9% share of all market purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors were responsible for 100% of these purchases, with zero activity from institutional buyers. The market saw 19 new single-property landlords emerge, highlighting grassroots-level growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors control a near-total 98.7% of the investor-owned housing stock.
Single-property landlords alone form the market's foundation, owning 1,435 properties for an 85.4% share. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no company crossover.
Even as portfolios grow, individuals maintain control, owning 75.0% of properties in the 3-5 unit tier and 87.5% in the 11-20 unit tier. Company ownership peaks at just 25.0% in the 3-5 property bracket.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with several zip codes exceeding 80% investor control.
The 83223 zip code is 100% investor-owned, while 83261 and 83239 have investor ownership rates of 81.2% and 87.9%, respectively. The 83287 zip code has the highest volume with 580 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one sold in 2025.
This accumulation phase has been consistent, following an even stronger 22-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2024. In contrast, institutional investors were net neutral in 2025, with one purchase and one sale.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove market liquidity in Q4, participating in 63.4% of all transactions.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for all 26 landlord transactions, with zero institutional activity. New single-property buyers sourced just 5.0% of their purchases from other landlords, preferring to buy from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,644 SFRs, over half the market, with individuals holding 86.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bear Lake County is exceptionally high, with landlords controlling 1,644 single-family properties, which constitutes a majority 50.8% of the entire SFR market (3,238 properties).

The market is overwhelmingly driven by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 1,428 properties, accounting for 86.9% of the investor-held housing stock, compared to just 269 properties (16.4%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 1,760 individual landlords operate, outnumbering the 256 company landlords by a ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

A significant majority of investor properties are owned outright, with 1,135 homes (69.0%) held as cash assets. This figure is more than double the 509 properties (31.0%) that are financed, signaling a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to generating rental income, as indicated by the 1,635 properties (99.5%) classified as rented, confirming a strong business focus for these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $54,259 more per home.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from national trends, landlords in Bear Lake County consistently pay a substantial premium for properties compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $319,593, which is 20.4% higher than the homeowner average of $265,334.

This price gap translates to investors paying an extra $54,259 per property in the last quarter, a behavior that suggests they are targeting high-value or high-income-potential properties not typically sought by primary residents.

While still significant, the Q4 premium represents a market normalization from extreme levels seen earlier in the year. The investor premium was an astonishing 132.8% ($398,203) in Q3 and 96.8% ($206,924) in Q2.

This trend of paying more suggests that investors are competing for a limited supply of desirable properties, possibly for vacation or short-term rental use, where potential income outweighs the higher acquisition cost.

Overall price trends remain volatile but elevated compared to the pandemic era (2020-2023 average of $470,956), with the 2024 average hitting $627,049 before settling to a 2025 average of $498,666.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated Q4 activity, acquiring 19 properties, a 67.9% share of all market purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were the primary force in the Bear Lake County market in Q4 2025, purchasing 19 of the 28 total SFRs sold, capturing a commanding 67.9% market share.

The quarter's activity was driven exclusively by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of all investor acquisitions, with no purchases made by mid-size or institutional players.

New market entrants were a significant factor, with 19 distinct entities purchasing one property each. These single-property acquisitions made up 71.4% of all landlord buying activity for the quarter.

The small landlord tier (3-5 properties) was the second most active, with 3 entities acquiring 5 properties, which represented 23.8% of the investor purchases.

The complete absence of institutional buying (0.0% share) underscores the hyper-local, small-investor character of the Bear Lake County real estate market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors control a near-total 98.7% of the investor-owned housing stock.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bear Lake County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) control 98.7% of all investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding landlords are the backbone of the market, with the '1 property' tier alone accounting for 1,435 properties. This represents a massive 85.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

In stark contrast to national narratives, there is a complete absence of large-scale institutional ownership. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier hold 0.0% of the market share.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) also have a minimal footprint, collectively owning just 22 properties, or 1.4% of the total investor portfolio.

This highly fragmented ownership structure indicates that the local rental market is shaped by thousands of individual decisions rather than by corporate-level strategy.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every portfolio tier, with no company crossover.
Detailed Findings

Unlike many markets where ownership professionalizes into corporate entities as portfolios grow, individual investors in Bear Lake County remain the dominant force across all tiers.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owner. Individuals own 85.6% of single-property portfolios and still hold a 75.0% majority in the 3-5 property tier.

Company ownership is most prevalent in the 3-5 property tier, but even there it only reaches a 25.0% share (27 properties), with individuals holding the other 81 properties.

The trend continues into larger portfolios, with individuals owning 14 of the 16 properties (87.5%) in the 11-20 property tier, demonstrating a sustained preference for personal ownership over incorporation.

This data suggests that the local investment culture is deeply rooted in personal capital and management, resisting the trend of corporate aggregation seen elsewhere.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated, with several zip codes exceeding 80% investor control.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Bear Lake County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in specific zip codes, indicating targeted acquisition strategies.

Several areas exhibit extreme levels of investor penetration. The 83223 zip code is fully investor-owned (100.0%), while 83239 (87.9%), 83261 (81.2%), and 83272 (77.2%) also show landlord ownership rates far exceeding the county average.

By sheer volume, the 83287 zip code is the center of investor holdings, containing 580 investor-owned properties, which translates to a 62.9% ownership rate for that area.

The second-largest concentration by count is in 83254, with 378 properties, though its ownership rate of 27.3% is more moderate compared to other hotspots.

This intense clustering suggests that investors are targeting communities with specific features, such as proximity to recreational amenities like Bear Lake, which are prime for vacation or short-term rentals.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Bear Lake County are in a clear and aggressive accumulation phase, consistently operating as strong net buyers. Throughout 2025, they purchased 104 properties while selling only 9, a buy-to-sell ratio of 11.6x.

This powerful net buying trend has been sustained over time. In 2024, the activity was even more pronounced, with 88 buys against just 4 sells, resulting in a 22-to-1 ratio.

The most recent quarter, Q4 2025, continued this pattern with 26 properties purchased and only a single property sold by investors.

The tiny institutional segment of the market shows no such growth appetite. In 2025, institutional-level transactions were perfectly balanced, with one purchase and one sale, resulting in a net neutral position.

This data signals strong and sustained confidence among the county's dominant small investor class, who are actively expanding their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove market liquidity in Q4, participating in 63.4% of all transactions.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 real estate market was heavily influenced by investor activity, with landlords involved in 26 of the 41 total transactions, representing a 63.4% share of all market activity.

All landlord-side transactions were conducted by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), reinforcing that small players are not just the primary owners but also the most active traders in this market.

New entrants in the single-property tier, who made 20 purchases, primarily bought from homeowners rather than existing investors. Only 1 of their 20 acquisitions (5.0%) was from another landlord.

This low rate of inter-landlord trading for new buyers suggests that the market's expansion is fueled by converting owner-occupied housing into rentals, rather than just churning existing rental stock.

The average purchase price for these new single-property investors in Q4 was $345,090, establishing a clear entry point for participating in the local rental market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors command Bear Lake County's housing market, owning over 50% of homes and actively buying at premium prices.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,644 SFR properties, a majority 50.8% of Bear Lake County's market. The portfolio is dominated by individual investors, who hold 1,428 of these properties (86.9%), compared to 269 (16.4%) for companies.
Pricing
In a notable market reversal, landlords paid 20.4% more than homeowners in Q4 2025, a premium of $54,259 per property ($319,593 vs $265,334).
Activity
Investors drove 67.9% of all Q4 home sales, purchasing 19 properties. This growth was fueled by new entrants, with 19 entities becoming single-property landlords this quarter.
Market Share
The market is almost entirely controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 98.7% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across every portfolio size, with no crossover tier where companies take majority control, owning 85.6% of even single-property portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025 (104 buys vs 9 sells). In contrast, institutional investors were completely inactive or net neutral.
Market Narrative

The real estate market in Bear Lake County, ID, is defined by an extraordinary level of investor penetration and is controlled almost exclusively by small, individual landlords. Investors own 1,644 properties, a staggering 50.8% of the county's entire single-family housing stock. This ownership is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 98.7% of the investor portfolio, while large-scale institutional firms have zero presence. The market is overwhelmingly powered by personal capital, as individual investors own 86.9% of these homes.

Investor behavior in this market defies typical conventions. Rather than seeking discounts, landlords consistently pay a premium over traditional homeowners, including a 20.4% premium in Q4 2025, suggesting a focus on high-yield properties where income potential justifies a higher cost. They are also in a period of aggressive accumulation, acting as strong net buyers with an 11.6-to-1 buy/sell ratio in 2025. This activity is fueled by a steady stream of new entrants, with 19 new single-property landlords joining the market last quarter alone.

The key takeaway is that Bear Lake County operates as a hyper-localized, investor-centric market, likely driven by tourism and the demand for short-term or vacation rentals. The extreme ownership concentration in certain zip codes (some exceeding 90%) and the willingness to pay above-market rates point to a market where investment returns are prioritized over purchase price. Its dynamics are shaped not by Wall Street but by thousands of small-scale entrepreneurs, making it a distinct and highly specialized real estate environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:42 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Bear Lake (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Bear Lake (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-bear_lake/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.