Butte (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Butte (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Butte (ID)
660
Total Investors in Butte (ID)
165
Investor Owned SFR in Butte (ID)
125(18.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
159
SFR Owned
119
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
6
SFR Owned
8
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 125 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 100% of Butte County's Investor Market, Actively Acquiring Properties
In Butte County, ID, investors own 125 single-family residential properties, representing 18.9% of the market. This ownership is entirely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with individuals holding a 95.2% majority share. In Q4 2025, these small investors were strong net buyers and purchased 28.6% of all homes sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 125 SFRs in Butte County; individuals control a dominant 95.2% share.
Cash purchases (66 properties) slightly outpace financed ones (59). The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 124 of 125 properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Q4 landlord pricing showed extreme volatility, with investors paying a 61.8% premium over homeowners.
The price gap is highly inconsistent due to low transaction volume, swinging from a 35.9% landlord discount in Q3 to a 61.8% premium in Q4. This fluctuation from a $159,284 discount one quarter to a $160,626 premium the next highlights a very thin market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 28.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
All landlord purchase activity came from mom-and-pop investors, who bought 2 properties, representing 100% of investor acquisitions. Four new single-property landlord entities entered the market, while institutional firms made zero purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Butte County, owning 100% of investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone control the vast majority of the market, holding 115 properties, or 91.3% of all investor-owned housing. There is zero institutional (1000+ property) ownership in this county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own 96.6% of single-property portfolios, while companies hold just 4 properties in that tier.
Companies only achieve a majority share (66.7%) in the statistically insignificant 3-5 property tier, which consists of just 2 company-owned properties and 1 individual-owned property. This is not a meaningful crossover point for corporate dominance.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 83213, with 70 properties owned by landlords.
The highest investor ownership rate is also found in 83213, at 19.6%. The top three zip codes by investor penetration are tightly clustered, with rates ranging from 16.7% to 19.6%, indicating consistent investor presence across the county's populated areas.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Butte County are strong net buyers, with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025.
This net-buyer trend is consistent over time, with landlords acquiring 23 properties while selling only 2 throughout 2025. Data indicates minimal institutional-level activity, with just 2 buys and 1 sale in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in one-third (33.3%) of all Q4 2025 market transactions.
All 4 landlord transactions were conducted by the smallest mom-and-pop investors in the single-property tier. Notably, 0% of their Q4 purchases were from other landlords, indicating they acquired inventory from the traditional homeowner market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 125 SFRs in Butte County; individuals control a dominant 95.2% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 125 single-family properties in Butte County, ID, making up 18.9% of the total 660 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by 159 individual landlords, who own 119 properties (95.2% of the investor portfolio), dwarfing the 8 properties (6.4%) held by 6 company investors.

The investor portfolio is geared entirely towards rentals, with 124 of the 125 properties being non-owner-occupied.

When it comes to financing, there is a near-even split between properties bought with cash versus those that are financed. Landlords hold 66 properties in cash, compared to 59 that carry financing, indicating a balanced approach to leverage in the local market.

The data clearly illustrates a market characterized by small-scale, individual investment rather than large corporate ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Q4 landlord pricing showed extreme volatility, with investors paying a 61.8% premium over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Butte County is extremely volatile, a characteristic of a market with low transaction volumes. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $420,745, a significant 61.8% premium over the traditional homeowner price of $260,119.

This Q4 premium starkly contrasts with prior quarters, demonstrating market inconsistency. In Q3 2025, landlords secured a 35.9% discount, paying $284,088 compared to homeowners at $443,372.

The dramatic swing from a $159,284 discount in Q3 to a $160,626 premium in Q4 underscores how individual high- or low-value transactions can heavily skew quarterly averages in a small market.

Even more extreme, in Q2 2025, landlords paid a 134.6% premium ($425,600 vs. $181,445), further cementing the unpredictability of pricing benchmarks in this area.

Given the low number of transactions, these quarterly pricing metrics should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect specific deals rather than a stable, predictable market trend.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 28.6% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were significant players in the Butte County market, purchasing 2 of the 7 total SFR properties sold, which translates to a 28.6% market share of acquisitions.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by the smallest investors. Both properties were acquired by landlords in the single-property tier, highlighting that market growth is coming from new entrants and small-scale players.

Reflecting this grassroots activity, 4 new landlord entities were created in the single-property tier during the quarter.

In stark contrast, mid-size and institutional investors were completely inactive, with zero properties purchased by landlords with portfolios larger than one property.

This pattern indicates that the local investment landscape is expanding from the bottom up, with no influence from large-scale or institutional capital.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords completely dominate Butte County, owning 100% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Butte County is exclusively controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who own 100% of the 125 investor-held SFRs.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest scale, with the single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounting for 115 properties, a remarkable 91.3% of the entire investor portfolio.

The next tier, two-property landlords, holds a distant 8 properties (6.3%), followed by the 3-5 property tier with just 3 properties (2.4%).

There is no presence from mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) or institutional investors (1000+ properties), making this a quintessential small-investor market.

This distribution underscores a market structure built on local, small-scale ownership, entirely independent of larger, professionalized real estate investment firms.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own 96.6% of single-property portfolios, while companies hold just 4 properties in that tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive force across the most significant ownership tiers in Butte County. In the dominant single-property tier, individuals own 113 of the 115 properties, a 96.6% share.

Similarly, in the two-property tier, individuals own 6 of the 8 properties, maintaining a strong 75.0% majority.

A crossover to company majority technically occurs in the small 3-5 property tier, where companies own 2 of the 3 properties (66.7%). However, with only three properties total, this tier is too small to signal a trend toward corporate control.

The data clearly shows that as portfolio sizes begin, they are overwhelmingly initiated and held by individual owners rather than corporate entities.

There is no evidence of corporate entities scaling up in this market, reinforcing the theme of individual, small-scale landlord dominance.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in zip code 83213, with 70 properties owned by landlords.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis within Butte County reveals that investor ownership is most concentrated in the 83213 zip code, which is home to 70 of the 125 investor-owned properties.

The 83213 zip code also boasts the highest rate of investor ownership at 19.6%, indicating it is the primary hub for rental properties in the county.

The second most active area for investors is the 83255 zip code, with 46 properties and a comparable ownership rate of 18.5%.

Investor penetration is relatively consistent across the main areas of the county, with the top three zip codes all showing ownership rates between 16.7% and 19.6%.

This pattern suggests a broad, rather than spotty, distribution of rental housing demand and investor activity within Butte County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Butte County are strong net buyers, with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Butte County have consistently been in an accumulation phase, acting as strong net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 4 properties while selling only 1, demonstrating continued portfolio growth.

This trend holds for the full year, as investors acquired 23 properties in 2025 against only 2 sales, resulting in a net gain of 21 properties.

The pattern was nearly identical in the prior year, with 24 buys and 3 sells in 2024, showing a sustained, multi-year strategy of portfolio expansion among local landlords.

Even the minimal transaction data attributed to institutional-sized entities shows a net-buyer position for 2025, with 2 properties bought and 1 sold.

Overall, the transactional data points to a confident investor base that is actively increasing its footprint in the Butte County SFR market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in one-third (33.3%) of all Q4 2025 market transactions.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a crucial role in market liquidity, participating in 4 of the 12 total SFR transactions, a significant 33.3% share.

All of this transaction volume was generated by the smallest investor segment. The 4 transactions were all attributed to single-property (Tier 01) landlords, who purchased at an average price of $420,745.

A key finding from the quarter is the source of these acquisitions. None of the properties purchased by landlords were bought from other landlords (0.0%), meaning all new inventory came from the traditional market, likely from homeowners.

This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests that existing investors are holding onto their assets, and market growth is driven by acquiring properties from outside the existing investor pool.

No transactional activity was recorded for any other investor tier, reinforcing that market dynamics are currently dictated entirely by new and small-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 100% of the Investor Market in Butte County, Actively Buying from Homeowners
Holdings
In Butte County, ID, landlords own 125 single-family properties, representing 18.9% of the local market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 119 of these properties (95.2%), compared to just 8 (6.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Pricing in Butte County's thin market is highly volatile; landlords paid an average of $420,745 in Q4, a 61.8% premium over homeowners ($260,119), a sharp reversal from the 35.9% discount observed in Q3.
Activity
Landlords were active in Q4, purchasing 28.6% of all homes sold (2 properties). Growth is driven by new entrants, with 4 new single-property landlord entities forming this quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of the investor-held housing stock. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all meaningful portfolio sizes, holding 95.2% of all properties. Companies do not have a significant foothold at any level of ownership in Butte County.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 (4 buys vs 1 sell), a trend consistent with the full year's activity (23 buys vs 2 sells). There is no significant institutional transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Butte County, ID is a textbook example of a locally-driven ecosystem, entirely shaped by small, individual investors. Landlords own 125 SFR properties, accounting for 18.9% of the county's total housing stock. This portfolio is firmly in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords, who control 100% of investor-owned properties. Individuals dominate, owning 95.2% of these homes, which underscores a market free from the influence of large-scale corporate or institutional capital.

Investor behavior in Butte County is characterized by active and consistent acquisition. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 28.6% of all homes sold and were decisive net buyers with a 4-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio. This growth is fueled by new entrants, as all Q4 purchases were made by single-property investors. While pricing data is volatile due to low transaction volume, the consistent net-buying activity signals strong confidence in the local market. Notably, landlords are acquiring properties from the traditional homeowner market, not from each other, suggesting a focus on expanding the rental pool rather than trading existing assets.

The key takeaway for the Butte County housing market is its stability and reliance on grassroots investment. The absence of institutional players means the rental market's dynamics are dictated by local owners who are steadily growing their portfolios. This structure suggests a market that is more insulated from national investment trends and instead responds to local supply and demand fundamentals. The ongoing acquisition by new and small landlords points to a healthy, growing rental sector built from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:49 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Butte (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Butte (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-butte/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.