Adams (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Adams (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Adams (ID)
1,998
Total Investors in Adams (ID)
1,795
Investor Owned SFR in Adams (ID)
1,281(64.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,653
SFR Owned
1,135
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
142
SFR Owned
154
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,281 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investor-Dominated Adams County Market Grinds to a Halt With Zero Q4 Transactions
Investors own a commanding 64.1% of all SFR properties in Adams County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 100% of this portfolio. After years as strong net buyers, investor activity completely ceased in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased or sold.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,281 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 88.6%.
Of these holdings, 76.3% (977 properties) are owned outright with cash, compared to just 23.7% (304 properties) that are financed. All 1,281 investor-owned properties are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Due to zero Q4 market activity, no current price comparison is available; in Q2, landlords paid 45.5% less than homeowners.
The last recorded price gap was a significant $307,818 discount for landlords in Q2 2025 ($369,370 vs $677,188 for homeowners). Prior to the Q4 halt, acquisition prices for landlords showed extreme volatility, swinging from $227,172 in Q1 to $508,416 in Q3.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchase activity was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the market's 0 total sales.
Both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors recorded zero purchases this quarter. This halt in activity represents a significant shift from previous periods of active buying.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor SFRs in Adams County.
Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, alone accounting for 87.9% of all investor-owned homes (1,158 properties). Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in this county.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the majority owners in every tier, with no price data available due to a lack of recent transactions.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership at any portfolio size; their highest concentration is just 19.6% in the 3-5 property tier. Individual landlords own 1,038 single-property rentals, 89.2% of that dominant tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes, 83654 and 83612, containing 94.4% of all investor-owned properties.
These areas also have extremely high investor ownership rates, with 73.1% of SFRs in 83654 and 62.0% in 83612 being investor-owned. The top 5 regions by ownership rate all exceed 28%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 39 properties while selling only 1 in 2025, but this trend stopped in Q4.
This net-buyer trend was also strong in 2024, with 64 properties purchased versus only 5 sold. There is no transaction history for institutional investors, as they have no presence in the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Investor transactions ceased in Q4, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of the 0 total market transactions.
The complete halt in activity means no properties were purchased by any investor tier, and no inter-landlord trades occurred. This marks a dramatic freeze in a market previously characterized by active buying.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,281 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 88.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold significant sway in the Adams County housing market, owning 1,281 of the 1,998 total SFR properties, which translates to a commanding 64.1% market share.

The market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale, individual ownership rather than corporate control. Individual landlords own 1,135 properties, accounting for 88.6% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 154 properties (12.0%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in entity counts, where 1,653 of the 1,795 total landlords (92.1%) are individuals, indicating a broad base of small investors.

A strong indicator of financial stability within the investor community is the high prevalence of cash ownership. A substantial 76.3% of investor-held properties (977 homes) are owned free and clear, more than triple the number of financed properties (304).

The entire investor portfolio of 1,281 properties is dedicated to rentals, with every single one classified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the deep rental penetration in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Due to zero Q4 market activity, no current price comparison is available; in Q2, landlords paid 45.5% less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Adams County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired by landlords, making a direct price comparison with homeowners for the quarter impossible.

Looking at the most recent active quarter, Q2 2025, landlords demonstrated a powerful purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $369,370. This represents a staggering 45.5% discount compared to the $677,188 paid by traditional homeowners, a cash difference of $307,818 per property.

This pattern of securing properties below the typical market rate was also evident in Q1 2025, when landlords paid $227,172 on average, a 27.3% discount ($85,328) from the homeowner price of $312,500.

The average acquisition price for landlords has been highly volatile in 2025, more than doubling from $227,172 in Q1 to $508,416 in Q3 before activity ceased, signaling an unstable pricing environment prior to the market freeze.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchase activity was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the market's 0 total sales.
Detailed Findings

The investor real estate market in Adams County effectively shut down in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero SFR purchases out of zero total market sales. This 0.0% market share reflects a complete cessation of transaction activity.

The purchasing freeze was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords, who constitute the entirety of the local market, acquired zero properties, accounting for 0.0% of landlord activity.

Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) were also completely inactive, recording zero purchases for the quarter.

This abrupt halt in acquisitions marks a dramatic shift in market dynamics, especially given the consistent buying activity observed in previous years and quarters.

The lack of any new entity formation in the single-property tier, which typically signals new entrants, further confirms the deep freeze that has taken hold of the investor market in Adams County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor SFRs in Adams County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Adams County is exclusively defined by small-scale landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) owning 100% of the 1,317 investor-held properties.

First-time or single-holding investors are the most significant force, with the single-property tier alone comprising 1,158 properties, an overwhelming 87.9% of the entire investor portfolio.

The concentration at the small end of the scale is stark: investors with 1-5 properties collectively own 99.9% of all landlord-held SFRs, leaving almost no room for larger players.

There is absolutely no institutional investor (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) presence in Adams County, reinforcing its character as a market driven entirely by local and small-scale investment.

This complete dominance by smaller landlords indicates a market structure fundamentally different from areas with significant corporate or institutional ownership, suggesting that local economic factors heavily influence rental housing availability.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the majority owners in every tier, with no price data available due to a lack of recent transactions.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier in Adams County, preventing companies from gaining a majority stake at any portfolio size.

In the largest and most foundational tier of single-property owners, individuals hold 1,038 properties, representing 89.2% of the tier, compared to just 126 properties for companies.

Even as portfolio sizes increase, individual ownership remains the standard. In the two-property tier, individuals own 92 homes (84.4%), and in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), they own 41 homes (80.4%).

The peak penetration for corporate ownership occurs in the 3-5 property tier, where they hold only 10 properties, a mere 19.6% share, underscoring their limited role in the market.

Due to the complete halt in Q4 2025 transactions, no recent pricing data is available to compare acquisition strategies between individual and company investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes, 83654 and 83612, containing 94.4% of all investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Adams County is intensely focused within two primary zip codes. The 83654 zip code leads with 678 investor-owned properties, immediately followed by 83612 with 531 properties.

Together, these two regions account for 1,209 properties, representing a staggering 94.4% of the entire investor portfolio in the county, indicating a highly localized market.

These are not just areas of high investor counts but also of extreme market penetration. In 83654, investors own 73.1% of all SFR properties, while in 83612, they own 62.0%, suggesting these communities are predominantly composed of rental housing.

The pattern of high investor saturation continues in other areas, with the top five zip codes by ownership rate all posting rates above 28%, including 83547 (50.0%), 83638 (45.3%), and 83632 (28.7%).

This geographic concentration highlights specific neighborhoods where rental availability is high but opportunities for traditional homeownership may be limited due to investor competition.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords have been strong net buyers, acquiring 39 properties while selling only 1 in 2025, but this trend stopped in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Historically, landlords in Adams County have been aggressive accumulators of property. In 2025, they operated as strong net buyers, purchasing 39 SFRs while selling only one, for a net gain of 38 properties.

This trend was consistent with the previous year, as landlords in 2024 acquired 64 properties and sold just 5, resulting in a net increase of 59 properties to their portfolios.

The most active period of buying in the last two years was Q2 2025, when landlords purchased 12 properties and sold only one.

This consistent pattern of net buying makes the abrupt halt in Q4 2025, where zero buy or sell transactions occurred, a particularly stark and significant shift in market behavior.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) have no transaction history in Adams County, as they do not own property in the region, leaving market dynamics entirely in the hands of smaller landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Investor transactions ceased in Q4, with landlords accounting for 0.0% of the 0 total market transactions.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market for investors in Adams County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025. Landlords were involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 0.0%.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) recording zero transactions for the quarter.

No pricing data is available by tier for Q4, as no purchases were made. The average purchase price for all tiers, from single-property landlords to larger investors, was $0.

The market for inter-landlord trading also froze, with 0% of transactions originating from other landlords, reflecting a total lack of liquidity and portfolio shuffling among investors.

This complete cessation of transactional activity contrasts sharply with previous quarters and years, signaling a potential market shift or a response to broader economic pressures affecting local investors.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Adams County's investor-saturated market, 100% controlled by mom-and-pops, saw all buying activity freeze in Q4 2025.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,281 SFR properties, a 64.1% share of the total market in Adams County, with individual investors holding a commanding 88.6% of that portfolio (1,135 properties).
Pricing
No pricing data was available for Q4 2025 due to zero transactions; however, in Q2 2025, landlords paid 45.5% less than traditional homeowners, a discount of $307,818 per property.
Activity
Investor purchasing ground to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords responsible for 0.0% of all sales (0 properties) and no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, maintaining a strong majority even in multi-property tiers, with no crossover point at which companies take control.
Transactions
After being strong net buyers in 2025 (39 buys vs. 1 sell), landlords abruptly stopped all activity in Q4 with zero transactions. Institutional investors have no transaction history in the county.
Market Narrative

The housing market in Adams County, Idaho, is uniquely characterized by its high concentration of investor ownership, with landlords controlling a substantial 64.1% of all Single-Family Residential properties (1,281 homes). This market is not driven by large corporations but is the exclusive domain of small-scale investors. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords (owning 1-10 properties) command 100% of the investor-owned housing stock, with individuals owning 88.6% of these properties, while institutional firms have zero presence.

Historically, these local investors have been aggressive net buyers, consistently expanding their portfolios year after year. For example, they added a net of 38 properties in 2025 alone. When active, they have demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, securing properties at discounts as high as 45.5% compared to traditional homeowners. However, this long-standing pattern of activity came to a sudden and complete stop in Q4 2025, when landlords recorded zero purchases and zero sales, bringing market liquidity to a standstill.

The total freeze in Q4 investor activity signals a dramatic shift for Adams County's real estate landscape. The abrupt halt from a position of strong net buying suggests a response to profound economic uncertainty or altered local market conditions. This cessation of activity, in a market so heavily reliant on rental housing provided by small landlords, could have significant implications for future housing availability, pricing, and market stability in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:42 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Adams (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Adams (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-adams/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.