Jefferson (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (ID)
7,940
Total Investors in Jefferson (ID)
1,907
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (ID)
1,493(18.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,705
SFR Owned
1,230
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
202
SFR Owned
333
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,493 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County, Controlling 92.4% of Investor Properties and Driving Market Activity
Investors own 1,493 SFR properties in Jefferson County, representing 18.8% of the total market, with small-scale landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 92.4% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 23.3% of all homes sold while securing a significant 17.9% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. The market is defined by local investors, as institutional presence is minimal at just 0.1% of holdings.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,493 SFRs in Jefferson County, with individual landlords holding 82.4% of the portfolio.
The investor portfolio is primarily held in cash, with 1,055 properties owned outright versus 438 that are financed. A massive 96.9% of these properties are non-owner-occupied rentals (1,447 properties), confirming a strong focus on rental income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 17.9% discount in Q4, paying on average $79,583 less than homeowners.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened significantly in the latter half of 2025, growing from a 6.6% discount in Q2 to 17.9% in Q4. This trend reverses the market dynamic from Q1, when landlords paid a 2.7% premium.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 23.3% of all homes sold in Q4, led by new mom-and-pop investors.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 90.0% of all investor purchases this quarter. New single-property investors alone acquired 13 homes, making up 65.0% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.4% of investor-owned homes, dwarfing institutional share.
Single-property landlords are the backbone of the market, owning 1,111 properties, which is 70.6% of the entire investor portfolio. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) own just one property, representing a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios larger than 10 properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, owning 89.0% of single-property holdings. The strategic shift to a corporate structure occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies control 78.4% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with one zip code having 79.5% investor ownership.
The zip code 83442 contains the highest number of investor properties at 811, but has a modest 13.1% ownership rate. In contrast, zip code 83443 has a much smaller count (151 properties) but an extreme investor saturation of 79.5%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, buying 14.5 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This net-buyer trend has been consistent, with landlords purchasing 203 properties while selling only 89 for the full year 2025. The acquisition pace in 2025 nearly matched 2024, which saw 200 buys versus only 18 sells.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.0% of Q4 transactions, with institutions paying 27.0% more than new buyers.
In a surprising reversal, institutional buyers paid a premium, with an average purchase price of $453,900 compared to $357,506 for single-property landlords. Additionally, 50% of institutional purchases came from other landlords, while 0% of mom-and-pop buys did.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,493 SFRs in Jefferson County, with individual landlords holding 82.4% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 18.8% share of the single-family residential market in Jefferson County, with a total of 1,493 properties under their ownership.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, owning 1,230 properties, which accounts for 82.4% of all investor-owned SFRs, while companies own the remaining 333 properties (22.3%).

The landlord entity landscape further cements individual dominance, with 1,705 individual landlords compared to just 202 company landlords, a ratio of more than 8-to-1.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with cash-owned properties (1,055) outnumbering financed ones (438) by more than double. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, with 1,447 of the 1,493 properties classified as non-owner-occupied, representing a 96.9% rental focus.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 17.9% discount in Q4, paying on average $79,583 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power, acquiring properties for an average price of $365,673, a stark 17.9% discount compared to the $445,256 paid by traditional homeowners.

This translates to an average savings of $79,583 per property for investors, highlighting their ability to identify and secure undervalued assets.

The pricing advantage for landlords has not been static; it has grown dramatically throughout the year. The discount expanded from just 6.6% in Q2 ($32,838) to 17.5% in Q3 ($84,169) before settling at 17.9% in Q4.

This trend marks a sharp reversal from early 2025, when landlords were actually paying a 2.7% premium ($13,099) more than homeowners in Q1, signaling a major shift in market dynamics and investor negotiation power.

Overall, landlord acquisition prices have shown appreciation, rising from a 2020-2023 average of $327,314 to $365,673 in the most recent quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 23.3% of all homes sold in Q4, led by new mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 23.3% of all SFR market purchases in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 20 of the 86 homes sold in Jefferson County.

The purchasing activity was overwhelmingly driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively bought 18 properties, representing 90.0% of all landlord acquisitions.

New market entrants were a powerful force, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) made up the largest group of buyers, purchasing 13 properties or 65.0% of the investor total.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed minimal activity, acquiring just one property, which accounted for only 5.0% of landlord purchases.

This data highlights a market where growth is fueled from the bottom up, with a steady influx of new, small-scale investors rather than large corporate entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 92.4% of investor-owned homes, dwarfing institutional share.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Jefferson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 92.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

The concentration at the smallest scale is profound: landlords with just a single property (Tier 01) own 1,111 homes, accounting for 70.6% of the entire investor portfolio.

The combined share of all mid-size and large investors (11+ properties) is just 7.6%, underscoring the granular nature of the local rental market.

The role of institutional capital is virtually nonexistent. The 1000+ property tier holds only one property in the county, making up just 0.1% of the investor market.

This distribution challenges the common narrative of corporate consolidation and confirms that the Jefferson County SFR rental market is built upon the activity of thousands of small, local investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios larger than 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shows a clear evolution as portfolios scale. Individual investors dominate the smaller end of the market, owning 89.0% of all single-property landlord holdings and 77.2% of two-property portfolios.

This individual-heavy ownership continues into the 3-5 property tier (72.8% individual) and the 6-10 property tier (53.3% individual).

A distinct crossover point occurs once a portfolio grows beyond 10 properties. In the 11-20 property tier, company ownership surges to a 78.4% majority, indicating a strategic shift towards corporate structures for liability and management purposes as portfolios expand.

This pattern reveals that while individuals are the entry point and foundation of the market, scaling operations typically involves incorporation.

Even with this shift, the vast majority of all investor-owned properties (82.4%) remain under individual ownership, driven by the sheer volume of smaller landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with one zip code having 79.5% investor ownership.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Jefferson County is not uniform but concentrated in specific sub-markets.

A key distinction exists between high-volume and high-penetration areas. The 83442 zip code is the volume leader, with 811 investor-owned properties, but these only constitute 13.1% of its housing stock.

Conversely, other zip codes exhibit extreme investor saturation. The 83443 zip code stands out with a 79.5% investor ownership rate (151 properties), indicating a market almost entirely composed of rental housing.

Other areas with high investor penetration include 83431 (47.6%), 83425 (46.2%), and 83450 (39.3%), showcasing pockets of intense investor focus.

This data suggests investors are targeting specific neighborhoods or communities, creating rental-heavy enclaves within the broader county market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, buying 14.5 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Transaction data reveals that landlords in Jefferson County are aggressively expanding their portfolios. In Q4 2025, they were strong net buyers, acquiring 29 properties while selling only 2.

This yields a buy-to-sell ratio of 14.5x, signaling a high level of confidence in the market and a clear strategy of accumulation over disposition.

This behavior is not a recent anomaly but part of a sustained trend. Across all of 2025, landlords bought 203 properties and sold 89, remaining significant net buyers for the year.

The acquisition velocity in 2025 was comparable to 2024, when investors purchased 200 properties. However, selling activity was much lower in 2024, with only 18 properties sold, indicating an even stronger accumulation sentiment in the prior year.

There is no transaction data available for institutional-tier investors, but the overall market trend is unambiguously one of growth and portfolio expansion.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.0% of Q4 transactions, with institutions paying 27.0% more than new buyers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in 29 of the 138 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, capturing a 21.0% share of market activity.

A significant price disparity emerged among different investor tiers. Institutional buyers (1000+ tier) paid an average of $453,900 per property, a 27.0% premium over the $357,506 average paid by new single-property landlords.

This pattern defies the typical expectation that larger buyers leverage scale for discounts and suggests institutions may be targeting different, higher-value assets than new entrants.

The source of properties also differed by tier. Institutional investors were the only group to engage in inter-landlord trading, with 50% of their acquisitions (1 of 2 transactions) coming from an existing landlord.

In contrast, 100% of the 26 properties purchased by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were acquired from non-landlords, indicating they are bringing new housing stock into the rental market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Jefferson County's market, controlling 92.4% of holdings while actively acquiring properties at a deep discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,493 SFR properties, representing 18.8% of Jefferson County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio by owning or co-owning 1,230 of those properties (82.4%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 17.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $79,583 per property ($365,673 vs $445,256).
Activity
Landlords purchased 23.3% of all homes sold in Q4 (20 properties), with mom-and-pop investors accounting for 90.0% of that activity and at least 13 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) command 92.4% of investor-owned housing in Jefferson County, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint at just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners once a portfolio scales beyond 10 properties, taking a 78.4% share in the 11-20 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 14.5x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (29 buys vs 2 sells), indicating a strong accumulation phase across the market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jefferson County, ID, is fundamentally a story of the local investor. Landlords own 1,493 properties, a notable 18.8% of the total market, but this ownership is highly decentralized. Individual investors control 82.4% of this portfolio, and small-scale mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties) dominate the landscape with a commanding 92.4% share of all investor-held homes. In stark contrast, institutional investors have a virtually nonexistent presence, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio, confirming that the market's character is shaped by community-level investment, not corporate consolidation.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by strategic and aggressive acquisition. Landlords purchased 23.3% of all homes sold, demonstrating significant market influence. Their purchasing strategy appears highly effective, as they secured an average price discount of 17.9% compared to traditional homeowners—a savings of nearly $80,000 per property. Furthermore, transaction data reveals a strong accumulation trend, with investors buying 14.5 properties for every one they sold in the quarter, signaling deep confidence in the local market's future performance.

The key takeaway is that Jefferson County’s rental housing market is robust, growing, and driven by small, independent operators. The data dispels any notion of a corporate takeover and instead points to a healthy ecosystem of new and existing local landlords who are expanding their holdings by finding and capitalizing on below-market deals. This dynamic suggests a stable and decentralized rental supply, with growth fueled by individuals reinvesting within their own community rather than by outside institutional capital.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:55 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Jefferson (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Jefferson (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-jefferson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.