Washington (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Washington (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Washington (IN)
6,261
Total Investors in Washington (IN)
735
Investor Owned SFR in Washington (IN)
677(10.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
617
SFR Owned
513
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
118
SFR Owned
173
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 677 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Washington County with 92.8% Ownership, Buying at 52% Discount
Investors own 10.8% of Washington County's SFR market, a share overwhelmingly controlled by small, individual landlords (92.8%). In Q4 2025, these investors showcased savvy acquisition strategies, purchasing properties at a 52.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners while continuing to be strong net buyers, a stark contrast to the negligible presence and cautious activity of institutional firms.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 677 SFR properties in Washington County, with individuals holding 75.8%.
Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with 570 properties (84.2%) owned outright versus only 107 financed. A significant 96.6% of the investor portfolio (654 properties) is non-owner-occupied, underscoring a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired Q4 properties for $111,700, a massive 52.0% discount from homeowner prices.
The price advantage for landlords widened dramatically, jumping from a 24.9% discount ($62,186) in Q3 to a 52.0% discount ($120,994) in Q4. This demonstrates an increasing ability to secure properties far below typical market rates.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 10.5% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 9 properties.
Mom-and-pop investors were the exclusive drivers of market activity, responsible for 88.9% of landlord purchases. In stark contrast, large institutional investors made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence from the purchasing market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 92.8% of investor-held SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the rental market, alone owning 470 properties for a 67.7% share. In contrast, institutional investors have a negligible footprint, holding just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
The clear crossover point where corporate ownership surpasses individual ownership is the 6-10 property tier, where companies hold a 63.4% stake. Individuals own 85.2% of single-property portfolios, highlighting their role as the primary entry point for new landlords.
Geographic Distribution
The 47167 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 402 properties.
While 47167 holds the most properties, the 47281 zip code has the highest investor concentration at a 23.3% ownership rate. This reveals a clear distinction between markets with high volume and those with high investor penetration.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while selling only 5 in Q4.
The net-buyer trend has been consistent all year, with landlords acquiring 62 properties versus selling 24 in 2025. In contrast, institutional investors show far more cautious, balanced activity, with 5 buys and 4 sells for the entire year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 10.6% of all Q4 transactions, dominated by small investors.
Mom-and-pop investors drove nearly all the activity, with 11 of 13 transactions. New single-property landlords paid an average of $114,600 and sourced 33.3% of their purchases directly from other existing landlords, showcasing an active internal market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 677 SFR properties in Washington County, with individuals holding 75.8%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a total of 677 Single-Family Residential properties in Washington County, accounting for 10.8% of the 6,261 SFRs in the market.

Individual, or 'mom-and-pop', landlords form the backbone of the rental market, owning 513 properties (75.8%), which is more than triple the 173 properties (25.6%) held by companies.

The market shows a strong preference for all-cash holdings, with 84.2% of the investor portfolio (570 properties) owned free of financing. This suggests a low reliance on leverage and high liquidity among local investors.

The investor portfolio is overwhelmingly geared towards rentals, as evidenced by 654 properties (96.6%) being classified as non-owner-occupied.

When examining the entities themselves, the dominance of small operators is clear, with 617 individual landlords in the market compared to just 118 company landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired Q4 properties for $111,700, a massive 52.0% discount from homeowner prices.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Q4 2025 demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties at a deep discount, paying an average of $111,700. This was 52.0% less than the $232,694 paid by traditional homeowners, translating to a cash advantage of $120,994 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has not been static; it widened significantly throughout 2025. The investor discount surged from a substantial 24.9% in Q3 to an extraordinary 52.0% in Q4, signaling that investors are successfully targeting undervalued assets.

This pricing advantage has been a consistent feature of the market. Across all quarters of 2025, landlords have maintained a significant discount, ranging from 24.9% to the 52.0% peak in Q4.

While investor acquisition prices have been low, the average price paid by traditional homeowners has trended downward from a high of $282,967 in Q2 to $232,694 in Q4, a market shift that investors have capitalized on to expand their discount.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 10.5% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 9 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity constituted 10.5% of the total market in Q4, with landlords purchasing 9 of the 86 SFRs sold in Washington County.

The purchasing activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired 8 of the 9 properties, representing 88.9% of the investor buy-side.

New market entrants were the most significant force, as the single-property tier alone accounted for 6 property purchases (66.7%) by 7 different entities. This indicates a healthy influx of new landlords into the local market.

Large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely inactive in Q4, making zero purchases and ceding the entire market to smaller operators.

Activity from mid-to-large-sized investors was also minimal, highlighting that recent market growth is concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a commanding 92.8% of investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Washington County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties control a combined 92.8% of all investor-owned housing, challenging the narrative of corporate dominance.

The single-property tier represents the largest segment by a wide margin. These 470 properties make up 67.7% of the entire investor portfolio, showing that the typical landlord owns just one rental home.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a nearly nonexistent presence in the county, owning a mere 2 properties, which accounts for only 0.3% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Ownership is highly concentrated at the smallest end of the scale. The top four tiers combined (1 to 10 properties) hold 644 of the 677 investor properties, with ownership dropping off sharply for larger portfolios.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a very small portion of the market, collectively owning just 28 properties, or 4.0% of the total investor portfolio.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A distinct crossover in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow. Individual investors are the primary force in smaller tiers, owning 85.2% of single-property portfolios and 77.6% of two-property portfolios.

The trend reverses sharply at the 6-10 property tier, where companies take a 63.4% majority share of ownership, indicating a strategic shift toward incorporation for landlords managing larger portfolios.

Companies continue to increase their dominance with scale. In the 101-1,000 property tier, companies own 70.0% of the properties, reflecting a preference for a corporate structure to manage more complex operations.

Market entry is clearly driven by individuals, not corporations. The overwhelming 85.2% share of single-property portfolios held by individuals (404 properties) confirms that most new landlords are private citizens.

Even in larger tiers, individual ownership persists. Individuals retain a significant 30.0% stake in the 101-1,000 property tier, showing that some high-net-worth investors operate at scale without incorporating.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 47167 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, containing 402 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is heavily concentrated geographically, with the 47167 zip code serving as the primary hub. This single area contains 402 properties, representing 59.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in Washington County.

The highest rate of investor penetration is found elsewhere. In the 47281 zip code, investors own 23.3% of the local housing stock, more than double the county-wide average of 10.8%.

A key pattern emerges when comparing property counts to ownership rates. The area with the most investor properties (47167) has a relatively moderate ownership rate (10.4%), while high-penetration markets like 47281 have a much smaller absolute number of investor-owned homes.

The 47165 zip code is a significant secondary market, with 117 investor-owned properties, making it the only other area with over 100 such properties.

Several smaller zip codes, including 47281 (23.3%), 47108 (13.9%), and 47170 (13.5%), have become investor hotspots with ownership rates well above the county average, indicating targeted acquisition strategies in these areas.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 13 properties while selling only 5 in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Washington County are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers. In Q4 2025, they acquired 13 properties while selling only 5, for a net gain of 8 properties.

This accumulation trend has been steady throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords added a net 38 properties to their holdings, based on 62 purchases and 24 sales.

Acquisition velocity has remained stable year-over-year, with 62 properties purchased in 2025, identical to the 62 purchased in 2024. This signals a sustained and confident investment appetite.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier) operate with much greater caution. Their activity is nearly balanced, with just 5 acquisitions and 4 sales for all of 2025, indicating a strategy of portfolio maintenance rather than aggressive expansion.

While acquisition volumes were flat year-over-year, property sales by landlords increased from 18 in 2024 to 24 in 2025. However, buying activity still outpaces selling by a ratio of more than 2.5-to-1.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 10.6% of all Q4 transactions, dominated by small investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4, landlord activity accounted for 10.6% of all SFR transactions in the county, with investors participating in 13 of the 123 total deals.

The transaction market was entirely controlled by smaller players. The single-property tier alone was responsible for 9 of the 13 investor transactions (69.2%), with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 1-4) collectively making up 11 deals.

A significant level of inter-investor trading is evident, as one-third (33.3%) of properties bought by the most active tier (single-property landlords) were purchased from other landlords. This points to a liquid secondary market for rental assets.

Institutional investors were completely absent from the transactional market in Q4, with zero recorded buys or sells, ceding all activity to smaller investors.

The average price for single-property landlord purchases was $114,600, setting a clear price point for market entry during the quarter and aligning with the deep discounts observed relative to homeowner purchases.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small, individual investors command Washington County's rental market, controlling 92.8% of properties and buying at deep discounts.
Holdings
Investors own 677 SFR properties, representing 10.8% of Washington County's market, with individual landlords holding a 75.8% majority (513 properties) over companies' 25.6% (173 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid a remarkable 52.0% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $120,994 per property ($111,700 vs. $232,694).
Activity
Landlords purchased 10.5% of all SFRs sold in Q4 (9 properties), with activity driven by small operators as 7 new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with a 92.8% share of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, where they hold a 63.4% share.
Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers in Q4 with 13 acquisitions versus 5 sales, while large institutional investors show balanced, cautious activity with a nearly neutral position over the past year.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned housing market in Washington County, Indiana is defined by the dominance of small, local operators, not large corporations. Investors own 677 single-family properties, constituting 10.8% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 92.8% share, while institutional firms own a mere 0.3%. Furthermore, the market is powered by individuals, who own 75.8% of these properties, reinforcing the community-based nature of rental ownership in the county.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 highlights a pattern of savvy, value-oriented acquisitions. Landlords were involved in 10.5% of all purchases, securing properties at an astonishing 52.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity was driven by the smallest players, including 7 new landlords entering the market. Throughout the year, investors have been consistent net buyers, accumulating properties at a steady pace, while large institutional firms remained on the sidelines, showing almost no net growth.

The key takeaway from this data is that the Washington County rental market is healthy, liquid, and fundamentally a small-investor ecosystem. The narrative of a corporate takeover is unsupported here; instead, the market's character is shaped by individual landlords and small companies adept at finding undervalued properties and gradually expanding their holdings. This dynamic suggests a stable rental market grounded in local ownership rather than one susceptible to the strategies of large, out-of-state institutional funds.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 09:21 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Washington (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Washington (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-in-washington/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.