Woodford (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Woodford (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Woodford (IL)
12,518
Total Investors in Woodford (IL)
1,838
Investor Owned SFR in Woodford (IL)
1,690(13.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,662
SFR Owned
1,401
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
176
SFR Owned
320
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,690 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Woodford County, Owning 92.6% and Buying at a 51.4% Discount
Investors own 13.5% of the SFR market in Woodford County, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a staggering 92.6% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 23.6% of all homes sold at a remarkable 51.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors remained completely inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,690 SFR properties in Woodford County, with individual investors dominating at 82.9%.
Cash is the preferred acquisition method, funding 82.6% of investor-owned properties (1,396) compared to just 17.4% financed (294). A significant 95.0% of the portfolio (1,605 properties) is actively designated as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 51.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $147,391 average discount per property.
This massive discount has been a consistent feature of the market, remaining above 41% throughout 2025 and peaking at 53.9% in Q3. Investor acquisition prices have remained remarkably flat, with the Q4 average of $139,163 nearly identical to the 2020-2023 average of $139,201.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 23.6% of all SFR properties sold in Woodford County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) drove nearly all of this activity, accounting for 91.9% of landlord purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors made zero acquisitions, underscoring a market dominated by small players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Woodford County.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of the portfolio. The market's backbone is the single-property landlord, with this tier alone accounting for 1,120 properties, or 63.7% of all investor-held homes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a strategic shift as portfolios scale.
Below this crossover point, individuals overwhelmingly dominate, holding 91.1% of single-property portfolios and 85.7% of two-property portfolios. The data indicates a clear trend of incorporation as investors grow their holdings beyond 10 properties.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated by volume in zip codes 61548 (375 properties) and 61611 (206 properties).
However, the highest rates of investor ownership are in different areas, led by 61771 (23.4%) and 61516 (22.8%). This divergence shows investors are targeting smaller, high-penetration submarkets, not just the largest ones.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Woodford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 51 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
This strong accumulation trend is consistent, with a 4.8x buy-to-sell ratio for all of 2025 and an even higher 6.6x ratio in 2024. Purchase volume has remained remarkably stable year-over-year, with 149 acquisitions in 2025 compared to 151 in 2024.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, accounting for 51 of 230 total market transactions.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, conducting 48 of the 51 landlord transactions while institutions had zero. First-time landlords (Tier 1) paid the least at $117,048 per property, and inter-landlord trading was almost nonexistent.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,690 SFR properties in Woodford County, with individual investors dominating at 82.9%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a 13.5% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Woodford County, with a total portfolio of 1,690 properties out of 12,518 total.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who own 1,401 properties, representing 82.9% of the investor-owned market. Company-owned properties account for the remaining 320 homes (18.9%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlord entities, where 1,662 individuals vastly outnumber the 176 companies operating in the area.

Investors in this market demonstrate a strong preference for low-leverage strategies. Cash purchases account for 1,396 properties, or 82.6% of the portfolio, while only 294 properties (17.4%) are financed.

The portfolio is heavily utilized for its intended purpose, with 1,605 properties (95.0%) classified as rented, indicating a mature and active rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 51.4% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $147,391 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In a striking display of market separation, landlords in Q4 acquired properties at an average price of $139,163, which is 51.4% less than the $286,554 paid by traditional homeowners.

This percentage gap translates into a massive average discount of $147,391 per property, suggesting investors are targeting a completely different segment of the housing market than typical buyers.

This pricing advantage is not an anomaly. Throughout 2025, the investor discount has been substantial, ranging from 41.3% in Q2 ($112,066) to a high of 53.9% in Q3 ($148,215).

Despite broader economic trends, investor acquisition prices have shown no significant appreciation. The Q4 average price of $139,163 is virtually unchanged from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $139,201.

The data strongly indicates that landlords are not competing in bidding wars with homeowners for retail-priced properties. Instead, their strategy appears focused on distressed assets, off-market deals, or lower-priced inventory, allowing them to secure properties well below the typical market rate.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 23.6% of all SFR properties sold in Woodford County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Q4 2025 housing market, purchasing 35 of the 148 total SFRs sold, which amounts to a significant 23.6% market share.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely fueled by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, were responsible for 34 of the 35 purchases, or 91.9% of all investor activity.

The quarter saw a fresh wave of capital enter the market, with 32 new single-property landlords making their first purchase. This group alone acquired 23 properties, representing 62.2% of all investor buying.

Highlighting the local nature of the market, large-scale institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were completely absent, making zero purchases in Q4.

The data paints a clear picture of a grassroots investment market where growth is driven by new entrants and small, existing landlords expanding their portfolios, not by large corporations.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 92.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in Woodford County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Woodford County is defined by small, independent operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1 to 10 properties own a combined 92.6% of all investor-held single-family residential properties.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market. This tier alone holds 1,120 properties, which accounts for 63.7% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

In stark contrast to national media narratives, institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have a minimal presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.1% of the local market.

The ownership is highly fragmented. After the dominant single-property tier, landlords with 3-5 properties are the next largest group, holding 265 properties (15.1% share).

This distribution reveals a market characterized by a very low concentration of ownership in the hands of large players, suggesting a landscape that favors local expertise over large-scale institutional capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 11-20 property tier, signaling a strategic shift as portfolios scale.
Detailed Findings

A distinct strategic shift occurs as investor portfolios grow. While individuals dominate smaller holdings, companies take majority control at the 11-20 property tier, owning 29 properties for a 55.8% share.

Individual investors are the undisputed leaders in the entry-level tiers. They own 1,033 properties (91.1%) in the single-property tier and 138 properties (85.7%) in the two-property tier.

The likelihood of operating as a company increases with portfolio size. In the 6-10 property tier, company ownership rises to a substantial 44.0%, setting the stage for the crossover in the next tier.

The 21-50 property tier, though small, shows an even 50/50 split between individual and company ownership, with each holding 2 properties.

This pattern suggests that scaling beyond 10 properties often corresponds with a move towards a more formal business structure, likely to gain liability protection and financial advantages.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated by volume in zip codes 61548 (375 properties) and 61611 (206 properties).
Detailed Findings

The largest raw counts of investor-owned homes are found in a few key zip codes, with 61548 leading at 375 properties, followed by 61611 (206 properties) and 61738 (198 properties).

Interestingly, the zip codes with the highest percentage of investor ownership are entirely different. 61771 has the highest concentration with a 23.4% investor ownership rate, followed closely by 61516 (22.8%) and 61570 (21.8%).

This split between volume leaders and rate leaders indicates divergent investment strategies. Some investors focus on larger markets with more available inventory, while others concentrate their capital in smaller submarkets to achieve higher market penetration.

For example, the top zip code by count, 61548, has 375 investor properties but a relatively modest 9.3% ownership rate. This contrasts with 61771, which has a much higher rate of 23.4% but fewer total properties.

This geographic analysis reveals that investor activity is highly localized, with specific submarkets being targeted for either scale or density of ownership.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Woodford County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 51 properties while selling only 2 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrated by an overwhelming 25.5-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 2025, with 51 properties purchased versus only 2 sold.

This aggressive net-buying stance is a consistent, multi-year trend. For the full year 2025, landlords bought 4.8 properties for every one they sold (149 buys vs. 31 sells), continuing a pattern from 2024 which saw a 6.6x ratio (151 buys vs. 23 sells).

The velocity of acquisitions has been exceptionally stable. The 149 properties purchased in 2025 is nearly identical to the 151 properties purchased in 2024, indicating a steady and predictable demand from investors.

While acquisition volume remains flat, sales have seen a slight uptick, rising from 23 properties sold in 2024 to 31 in 2025. However, this modest increase in portfolio churn is completely overshadowed by the high volume of new purchases.

Consistent with other findings, no transaction data is available for institutional investors, reinforcing their non-participation in the Woodford County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 22.2% of all SFR transactions in Q4, accounting for 51 of 230 total market transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a crucial role in market liquidity during Q4, participating in 22.2% of all 230 single-family residential transactions in Woodford County.

This transaction volume was overwhelmingly driven by smaller players. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 48 of the 51 total landlord transactions.

A clear pricing strategy emerges across tiers, with the smallest investors securing the lowest prices. Single-property landlords paid an average of $117,048, significantly less than those in the 3-5 property tier, who paid the most at $216,250.

The market shows very little evidence of investors trading assets among themselves. Only one purchase by a single-property landlord (3.1%) came from another landlord, while all other active tiers reported acquiring 0% of their properties from fellow investors.

This lack of inter-landlord activity indicates that investors are almost exclusively sourcing their deals from the traditional market, such as acquiring properties from homeowners, rather than from a secondary investor market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Woodford County, Owning 92.6% of Investor SFRs While Buying at a 51% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 1,690 SFR properties, representing 13.5% of the total market in Woodford County. Ownership is heavily skewed towards individuals, who hold 1,401 of these properties (82.9%), compared to 320 (18.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated a significant pricing advantage in Q4, paying an average of $139,163, which is 51.4% less than the $286,554 paid by traditional homeowners—a staggering discount of $147,391 per property.
Activity
In Q4, landlords acquired 23.6% of all homes sold (35 properties), with activity driven by small investors. The market welcomed 32 new single-property landlords, who alone accounted for 62.2% of all investor purchases.
Market Share
The investor market is controlled by small operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 92.6% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) have a nearly nonexistent share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier (55.8% share), indicating a trend of incorporation as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers in Q4 with a 25.5-to-1 buy/sell ratio (51 buys vs. 2 sells). Institutional investors were completely inactive, making zero transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Woodford County, IL, is fundamentally a story of the small, independent investor. Landlords own 1,690 properties, comprising 13.5% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a commanding 92.6% of the investor-owned portfolio, while institutional investors hold a mere 0.1%. The ownership structure further emphasizes this local-first reality, with 82.9% of properties held by individual investors rather than corporations.

Investor behavior in Q4 highlights a strategy of value-oriented acquisition rather than direct competition with homeowners. Landlords purchased 23.6% of all homes sold but did so at a remarkable 51.4% discount, paying an average of $139,163 compared to the homeowner's $286,554. This activity is fueled by a consistent influx of new capital, as 32 new single-property landlords entered the market. Furthermore, existing landlords are in a strong accumulation phase, buying 25.5 properties for every one they sold in the last quarter, signaling deep confidence in the local market.

The key takeaway from this data is that Woodford County's rental market is not driven by Wall Street, but by Main Street. It is a highly fragmented, locally-controlled ecosystem where small investors leverage market knowledge to acquire properties at a significant discount. The complete absence of institutional activity, coupled with the dominance of new and small-scale landlords, points to a stable and growing grassroots investment environment that operates on principles entirely different from those of the traditional homebuying market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 03:10 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Woodford (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Woodford (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-il-woodford/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.