Custer (ID) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Custer (ID) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Custer (ID)
2,201
Total Investors in Custer (ID)
2,022
Investor Owned SFR in Custer (ID)
1,476(67.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,791
SFR Owned
1,283
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
231
SFR Owned
255
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,476 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Custer County's investor market is dominated by small landlords who own 99.9% of rental homes, as Q4 activity grinds to a halt with only a single institutional transaction.
In Custer County, investors own a commanding 67.1% of the SFR market (1,476 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling virtually the entire portfolio. The market saw a near-total freeze in Q4, with only one purchase—an institutional investor buying from another landlord. This reflects a broader trend of institutions being neutral/net sellers while smaller landlords hold their positions in a low-volume environment.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 1,476 SFRs, 67.1% of the Custer County market, with individual landlords holding 86.9% of the portfolio.
The majority of investor-owned properties are held in cash (1,140 properties) versus financed (336 properties), a ratio of over 3-to-1. Nearly the entire portfolio (1,472 of 1,476 properties) is designated as non-owner-occupied, confirming a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord or homeowner purchase prices were recorded in Q4, indicating a market freeze with zero transactional activity.
In previous quarters, landlord discounts were highly volatile, ranging from a 29.5% discount ($185,672) in Q2 2025 to a minimal 1.0% discount ($2,908) in Q3 2025. This fluctuation highlights an inconsistent and low-volume market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 100% of the scarce Q4 market, with a single purchase by an institutional investor representing all activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made zero purchases in Q4, a stark contrast to the institutional tier which accounted for 100% of investor buying. No new single-property landlords entered the market this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Custer County, controlling 99.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just a single property, which represents 0.1% of the investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords alone account for 83.9% of all investor holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in larger portfolios, capturing 90.0% of properties in the 6-10 property tier.
While individual investors own the vast majority of properties overall, the shift to corporate ownership begins at the 6-10 property tier. In the largest portfolios, companies hold a clear majority, contrasting with their minority share in smaller tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Custer County is concentrated in zip code 83226, with 547 properties owned by investors.
While 83226 leads in sheer volume, zip code 83278 has the highest market penetration, with investors owning 80.3% of all SFRs. The top three zip codes by investor ownership percentage all exceed a 68% saturation rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were neutral in Q4 with one purchase and one sale, a sharp deceleration from being strong net buyers in previous quarters.
For the full year of 2025, landlords were net buyers, acquiring 46 properties while selling only 6. Institutional investors were neutral/net sellers in Q4 and for the year, with one purchase and one sale recorded in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords conducted 100% of the single transaction in Q4, with an institutional investor acquiring a property from another landlord.
The only market activity was an institutional-tier transaction, as mom-and-pop investors registered zero transactions. This single trade was 100% an inter-landlord deal, highlighting an insular, low-liquidity market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 1,476 SFRs, 67.1% of the Custer County market, with individual landlords holding 86.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Custer County is exceptionally high, with landlords controlling 1,476 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a significant 67.1% of the county's total SFR market of 2,201 homes.

Individual, or 'mom-and-pop', investors are the undisputed backbone of the local rental market, owning 1,283 properties. This represents 86.9% of all investor-owned SFRs, leaving corporate entities with a much smaller footprint of 255 properties (17.3%).

The market is predominantly composed of small-scale operators, with 1,791 individual landlords compared to just 231 company landlords, demonstrating a local rather than institutional ownership structure.

A striking 77.2% of investor-owned properties (1,140 homes) are owned outright with cash, compared to only 336 that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals, with 1,472 of 1,476 properties (99.7%) classified as non-owner-occupied, underscoring the vital role these investors play in providing housing supply in Custer County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord or homeowner purchase prices were recorded in Q4, indicating a market freeze with zero transactional activity.
Detailed Findings

The Custer County real estate market experienced a complete halt in Q4 2025, with no valid acquisition price data available for either landlords or traditional homeowners, signaling a near-total lack of sales activity.

Prior to the Q4 freeze, landlords demonstrated an ability to secure properties at a discount, though the margin varied dramatically. In Q2 2025, they paid an average of $442,822, a substantial 29.5% ($185,672) less than homeowners, who averaged $628,494.

This pricing advantage narrowed significantly in Q3 2025, with the landlord discount shrinking to just 1.0% ($2,908), showcasing the pricing volatility inherent in a market with few transactions.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have seen a slight decline year-over-year, from an average of $381,364 in 2024 to $359,872 in 2025, reflecting the cooling market conditions leading up to the Q4 stall.

The absence of Q4 data, combined with prior volatility, suggests that Custer County is an illiquid market where pricing is heavily influenced by the few transactions that do occur each quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 100% of the scarce Q4 market, with a single purchase by an institutional investor representing all activity.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 housing market in Custer County was defined by extremely low volume, with only a single SFR purchase recorded in the entire quarter.

This lone transaction was made by a landlord, giving the investor segment a 100.0% market share of all purchases and highlighting a complete absence of buying from traditional homeowners.

In a surprising turn, the sole buyer was an institutional investor (1000+ properties), which acquired one property. This single purchase accounted for 100% of all landlord activity for the quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who constitute the vast majority of owners in the county, were completely inactive on the buying side, acquiring zero properties in Q4.

The data reveals no new market entrants, with zero purchases made by new single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating a lack of new investment flowing into the Custer County rental market at year's end.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Custer County, controlling 99.9% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Custer County is almost entirely composed of small-scale owners. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a staggering 99.9% of the investor-owned SFR market.

Single-property landlords are the largest segment by a wide margin, with their 1,283 properties making up 83.9% of all investor-held housing. This underscores the highly fragmented and localized nature of the rental market.

Two-property landlords follow distantly, holding 143 properties (9.3%), while landlords with 3-5 properties own 93 homes (6.1%).

In stark contrast to the dominance of small investors, institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, owning just one property in the entire county, which accounts for only 0.1% of the investor portfolio.

This distribution reveals a market that defies the narrative of large corporate ownership, instead relying almost exclusively on local, small-portfolio individuals to provide rental housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in larger portfolios, capturing 90.0% of properties in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the Custer County market overall, a clear pattern emerges as portfolio sizes increase: ownership systematically shifts toward corporate structures.

The crossover point occurs decisively in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 9 properties, accounting for 90.0% of the homes in that segment, while individuals own just one.

In smaller tiers, individual ownership is the standard. For single-property portfolios, individuals own 1,133 homes (85.3%) compared to 196 for companies (14.7%).

This trend continues for two-property landlords, where individuals hold a 77.6% majority (114 properties), and for 3-5 property landlords, with an 82.8% individual share (77 properties).

This data reveals a strategic divide: individuals form the foundation of the market with smaller holdings, while investors aiming for larger scale are far more likely to operate under a corporate entity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Custer County is concentrated in zip code 83226, with 547 properties owned by investors.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Custer County is highly concentrated geographically. The zip code 83226 is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 547 investor-owned properties, which represents 63.6% of the housing stock in that area.

However, the highest rate of investor penetration is found in zip code 83278, where landlords own an overwhelming 80.3% of the 350 SFR properties available.

Following 83226 in total count are 83251 with 449 investor properties (69.4% rate) and 83278 with 350 properties (80.3% rate), indicating significant investor presence across multiple areas.

The top five areas for investor ownership percentage all show rates above 63%, with 83278 (80.3%), 83251 (69.4%), and 83235 (68.8%) demonstrating particularly deep market saturation.

This analysis reveals that while some zip codes have a high raw count of investor properties, others have a higher proportion of their housing stock controlled by investors, pointing to different market dynamics across the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords were neutral in Q4 with one purchase and one sale, a sharp deceleration from being strong net buyers in previous quarters.
Detailed Findings

Landlord transaction activity in Custer County came to a standstill in Q4 2025, with investors making one purchase and one sale, resulting in a neutral net position. This marks a significant slowdown from previous periods.

This Q4 halt contrasts sharply with the activity earlier in the year. In Q3 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 19 properties and selling only one. Similarly, in Q2, they purchased 12 and sold just two.

Looking at the full year, landlords remained strong net buyers in 2025, with a total of 46 acquisitions against only 6 dispositions, a buy-to-sell ratio of over 7-to-1.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) mirrored the Q4 trend, recording one buy and one sell, making them neutral or net sellers for the quarter and the full year.

The sharp drop from strong net buying to a neutral position in Q4 signals a major market cooldown, with both large and small investors pausing acquisitions at the end of the year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords conducted 100% of the single transaction in Q4, with an institutional investor acquiring a property from another landlord.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 transaction market in Custer County was exclusively driven by landlords, who were involved in the only sale of the quarter, capturing 100.0% of all transaction activity.

The sole transaction was conducted by an institutional investor from the 1000+ property tier. No other investor tiers, including the dominant mom-and-pop segments, were active in the market.

This single institutional purchase was sourced directly from another landlord, resulting in a 100.0% inter-landlord transaction rate. This indicates that what little liquidity exists is currently confined within the investor community.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who own nearly the entire investor housing stock, made zero transactions in Q4, signaling a complete pause in portfolio adjustments for small investors.

The quarter's activity paints a picture of a frozen market where the only movement was a single asset changing hands between two large-scale investors, with no participation from smaller landlords or traditional homeowners.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Custer County's investor market, 99.9% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, ground to a halt in Q4 with only one institutional transaction recorded.
Holdings
Landlords own 1,476 SFR properties, a commanding 67.1% of Custer County's market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 1,283 (86.9%) of those homes compared to 255 (17.3%) for companies.
Pricing
No pricing data is available for Q4 due to a lack of transactions, but in prior quarters landlords secured properties at highly variable discounts, ranging from 1.0% to 29.5% below homeowner prices.
Activity
Q4 landlord activity was limited to a single purchase, representing 100% of all market sales, with an institutional investor being the sole buyer and no new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) exercise near-total control over the market, owning 99.9% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, capturing 90.0% of holdings in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords were neutral in Q4 (1 buy, 1 sell), a stark drop from their strong net buyer position earlier in the year. Institutional investors were also neutral for the quarter, with their single transaction defining the entire market's activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Custer County, Idaho is characterized by an exceptionally high concentration of investor ownership and a near-total dominance by small-scale landlords. Investors control 1,476 properties, representing a significant 67.1% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The market structure is overwhelmingly fragmented, with 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.9% of the rental portfolio, while institutional firms (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence of just 0.1%. This dynamic is further emphasized by ownership type, as individual investors own 86.9% of the properties.

Investor behavior in the fourth quarter pointed to a market at a standstill. After being strong net buyers earlier in the year, landlords paused activity, executing only one purchase and one sale in Q4. This single transaction, conducted by an institutional investor, accounted for 100% of the quarter's sales volume. Notably, the property was acquired from another landlord, indicating that what little market liquidity exists is insular. Pricing data was unavailable due to the lack of activity, but prior quarters showed landlords could achieve significant, though volatile, discounts compared to traditional homeowners.

The key takeaway for the Custer County housing market is its dependence on a vast network of small, local landlords in a low-volume, illiquid environment. The Q4 freeze in activity, coupled with the neutral stance of the sole active institutional player, suggests a period of caution and stability. The market's future direction will be dictated not by large corporations, but by the collective decisions of hundreds of individual investors who currently provide the vast majority of the area's rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 01:51 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Custer (ID)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Custer (ID) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-id-custer/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.