Jefferson (IL) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (IL) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (IL)
10,834
Total Investors in Jefferson (IL)
807
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (IL)
660(6.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
716
SFR Owned
556
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
91
SFR Owned
114
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 660 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Jefferson County, Controlling 95.2% of Investor-Owned Homes While Securing Deep Discounts
Investors own 660 SFR properties in Jefferson County (6.1% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 95.2% versus a mere 0.3% for institutional investors. In Q4 2025, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20.7% of homes sold at an average 32.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling a market defined by small-scale, value-driven acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 660 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.2% share.
Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards cash purchases, which outnumber financed properties 3-to-1 (498 vs. 162). The vast majority of these holdings (91.5%) are classified as rented, confirming their primary use as investment properties.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 32.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking $57,271 average discount per property.
The landlord purchasing advantage has been highly volatile, swinging from a minimal 2.5% discount in Q3 to an enormous 51.1% discount in Q2. Average landlord acquisition prices have risen 22.9% from the 2020-2023 average of $98,588 to $121,136 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 19 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these acquisitions, with zero properties purchased by institutional investors. The market saw an influx of 17 new single-property landlords, underscoring grassroots growth.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.2% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Jefferson County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties have a negligible footprint, owning just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the total. Landlords with only a single property form the market's foundation, owning 519 properties (77.1%).
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, a key shift from individual dominance in smaller tiers.
While individuals own 90.9% of single-property portfolios, companies control 64.7% of properties in the 6-10 property tier. Surprisingly, even in the 'Large' tier (101-1000 properties), individuals still own a 55.6% majority share.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Jefferson County is most concentrated in the 62816 zip code, which leads in both property count and ownership rate.
The 62816 zip code contains 42 investor-owned properties and has the highest investor penetration at 9.7%. The 62808 zip code also shows high concentration with an 8.3% ownership rate, despite having only 3 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.3 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent, with landlords maintaining a 6.9x buy-to-sell ratio for the full year 2025 (110 buys vs. 16 sells) and an 8.6x ratio in 2024 (146 buys vs. 17 sells). Transaction volume shows a slight seasonal slowdown in Q4.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 16.9% of all Q4 property transactions, exclusively driven by small investors.
Single-property investors paid an average of $125,618 per home. A small but notable portion of these new landlords (11.8%) purchased their properties directly from other existing investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 660 SFR properties, with individual landlords holding a dominant 84.2% share.
Detailed Findings

In Jefferson County, investors hold 660 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 6.1% of the total 10,834 SFRs in the market.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who own 556 properties, or 84.2% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company investors hold the remaining 114 properties (17.3%).

This individual dominance extends to the entity level, where 716 of the 807 total landlords (88.7%) are individuals, compared to just 91 companies.

A strong preference for low-leverage acquisitions is evident, as cash-purchased properties (498) are more than triple the number of financed properties (162).

The portfolio is clearly rental-focused, with 604 of the 660 investor-owned properties (91.5%) actively rented, underscoring the business purpose of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 32.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a striking $57,271 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Jefferson County achieved a substantial 32.1% price advantage over traditional homeowners, paying an average of $121,136 while homeowners paid $178,407.

This represents a significant cash discount of $57,271 per property, indicating that investors are effectively targeting undervalued or off-market opportunities.

The landlord discount has shown extreme volatility throughout the year. The Q4 figure of 32.1% follows a quarter where the discount was just 2.5% (Q3), and a massive 51.1% discount ($94,785) in Q2.

This fluctuation suggests that landlord purchasing activity is highly opportunistic rather than following broad market pricing trends.

Despite acquiring properties at a discount, average prices paid by landlords have appreciated significantly since the pandemic boom years, rising 22.9% from an average of $98,588 between 2020-2023 to $121,136 in the most recent quarter.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords purchased 20.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 19 homes.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 19 of the 92 total SFRs sold, capturing a 20.7% market share of purchases.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) made 100% of the investor acquisitions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made none.

New entrants drove the majority of Q4 activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone purchased 14 homes, representing 73.7% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

This activity was carried out by 17 distinct entities in the single-property tier, signaling a healthy influx of new, small-scale investors into the Jefferson County rental market.

The complete absence of purchases from mid-size and institutional tiers highlights a market exclusively shaped by local, small-portfolio landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.2% of all investor-owned SFR housing in Jefferson County.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Jefferson County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively control 95.2% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant segment by a wide margin, holding 519 properties, which accounts for 77.1% of all investor-owned homes.

The narrative of large-scale corporate ownership does not apply here. Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, owning just 2 properties, or 0.3% of the portfolio.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after the smallest tiers, with mid-size and large investors (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) combined owning only 4.5% of the portfolio.

This ownership structure confirms that the local rental market is supplied and controlled by a large number of small, independent operators rather than a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties, a key shift from individual dominance in smaller tiers.
Detailed Findings

There is a clear structural shift in ownership type as portfolio sizes increase. While individuals dominate smaller tiers, companies take majority control for the first time in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), owning 11 properties (64.7%) compared to individuals' 6 properties (35.3%).

Individual ownership is most pronounced at the entry level. In the single-property tier, individuals own 478 of 519 properties, a commanding 90.9% share.

This pattern of individual dominance continues through the 3-5 property tier, where individuals still own a 65.0% majority.

Interestingly, the shift to corporate ownership is not absolute in larger tiers. In the 101-1,000 property tier, individuals still hold a 55.6% majority, suggesting that even substantial local portfolios are often personally held.

This data illustrates a market where individuals form the base and majority, with corporate structures becoming more prevalent for managing portfolios exceeding five properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Jefferson County is most concentrated in the 62816 zip code, which leads in both property count and ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

The geographic focus of real estate investment in Jefferson County is centered on the 62816 zip code, which hosts 42 investor-owned SFRs—the highest count in the county.

This same zip code also exhibits the highest rate of investor penetration, with 9.7% of its SFR housing stock owned by landlords.

The second-largest concentration by volume is in the 62814 zip code, with 28 investor-owned properties, though its ownership rate is a lower 6.0%.

A notable pattern of high concentration in low-volume areas is visible in zip code 62808, which has the county's second-highest ownership rate at 8.3% but contains only 3 investor properties.

This analysis reveals that while the 62816 zip code is the clear hub for investor activity, other smaller zip codes also have a significant proportion of their housing stock serving as rental investments.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7.3 times more properties than they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jefferson County are firmly in an accumulation phase, demonstrating a strong net-buyer position. In Q4 2025, they purchased 22 properties while selling only 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.3 to 1.

This aggressive buying behavior has been a consistent trend over the past two years. For the full year of 2025, landlords acquired 110 properties and sold just 16, a ratio of 6.9x. The trend was even stronger in 2024, with 146 buys against 17 sells, an 8.6x ratio.

While the net-buyer status is clear, the pace of acquisitions moderated slightly toward the end of 2025. Purchases decreased from 32 in Q2 and 29 in Q3 to 22 in Q4.

Sales activity has remained consistently low, with single-digit sales in most quarters, reinforcing the strategy of long-term holds rather than short-term flips.

Institutional transaction data was not available for this county, but the overall market data points to a clear pattern of sustained portfolio growth among existing landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 16.9% of all Q4 property transactions, exclusively driven by small investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 22 of the 130 total SFR transactions in Jefferson County, accounting for a 16.9% share of market activity.

This activity was entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors, with all 22 transactions conducted by landlords in Tiers 01-04. There were zero transactions involving institutional-scale investors.

New market entrants (Tier 01) dominated transaction volume, conducting 17 of the 22 investor purchases. These single-property landlords paid an average price of $125,618.

A small secondary market exists between investors, as 11.8% of properties (2 of 17) acquired by Tier 01 landlords were purchased from other landlords.

Pricing strategies varied significantly by tier. While new landlords paid $125,618, the few transactions from small landlords (3-5 properties) were at a much higher average price of $227,500, suggesting they targeted different types of assets.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Jefferson County, Controlling 95.2% of Investor-Owned Homes
Holdings
Landlords own 660 SFR properties, representing 6.1% of the Jefferson County market. Individual investors hold 556 of these homes (84.2%), with companies owning the remaining 114 (17.3%).
Pricing
Landlords acquired properties at a significant 32.1% discount in Q4 2025, paying an average of $121,136 compared to the $178,407 paid by traditional homeowners—a savings of $57,271.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 19 properties, accounting for 20.7% of all sales. This activity was driven by small investors, including 17 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market with 95.2% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible share of just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios up to five properties, but companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, holding 64.7% of homes in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 7.3x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (22 buys vs. 3 sells), consistently accumulating properties throughout the year. Institutional transaction data was not available for the area.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Jefferson County, Illinois is defined by the overwhelming dominance of small, local landlords. Investors own 660 single-family properties, a modest 6.1% of the total market, with individuals comprising 84.2% of all owners. The market structure heavily skews toward small operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.2% of all investor-owned housing. In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios over 1,000 properties have a virtually nonexistent footprint, owning just 0.3% of the inventory, defying the national narrative of corporate consolidation.

Investor behavior is characterized by opportunistic acquisitions and steady accumulation. In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, purchasing 20.7% of all homes sold while securing them at a steep 32.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners. This indicates a focus on finding value outside the mainstream retail market. These investors are strong net buyers, acquiring 7.3 properties for every one they sold in the last quarter, a trend consistent over the past two years. The market continues to grow from the ground up, with 17 new single-property landlords entering in Q4 alone.

The key takeaway for the Jefferson County housing market is that it operates as a classic 'mom-and-pop' ecosystem. It is shaped not by large corporations, but by hundreds of individual investors making value-driven, often cash-heavy purchases. The significant pricing discounts suggest investors are providing liquidity for distressed or off-market properties, creating a distinct sub-market that operates in parallel to traditional home sales. This dynamic ensures a stable supply of rental housing maintained by local stakeholders deeply embedded in the community.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 12, 2026 at 02:32 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Jefferson (IL)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Jefferson (IL) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-il-jefferson/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.