Putnam (IN) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Putnam (IN) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Putnam (IN)
9,106
Total Investors in Putnam (IN)
1,096
Investor Owned SFR in Putnam (IN)
999(11.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
903
SFR Owned
692
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
193
SFR Owned
314
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 999 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Putnam County with 91.4% Ownership as Landlords Pivot to Net Sellers in Q4
Investors own 999 SFR properties in Putnam County (11.0% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 91.4%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 5.7% of homes sold, surprisingly paying 20.4% more than homeowners, while also becoming net sellers for the quarter for the first time in 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 999 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 69.3%.
Cash-backed ownership is prevalent, with 794 properties (79.5%) owned outright versus 205 financed. Nearly the entire portfolio is investment-focused, with 960 of the 999 properties (96.1%) designated as non-owner-occupied rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners in Q4.
Landlords paid an average of $361,760 in Q4, which is $61,368 more than traditional homeowners. This marks a stark shift from Q2 2025, when landlords secured a massive 67.7% discount, indicating highly variable purchasing strategies.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 5.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, a total of 6 homes.
Mom-and-pop landlords drove half of the investor activity, purchasing 3 properties (50.0%). Institutional investors were also active, acquiring 2 properties and accounting for 33.3% of landlord purchases. Three new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 91.4% of investor-owned homes.
In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.4% of the local investor-owned housing stock. Single-property landlords alone account for 65.9% of all investor-owned properties, making them the foundation of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies take over at the 6-10 property tier.
Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, controlling 89.1% of properties in that segment. In contrast, individuals own 83.6% of single-property portfolios and 69.3% of 3-5 property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 46135 zip code holding 538 properties.
The 46135 zip code holds the most investor properties (538) at a 12.6% ownership rate. However, the highest concentration is in 47868, where investors own 17.4% of all SFRs. The top 5 zip codes by count hold a combined 902 properties.
Historical Transactions
Landlords became net sellers in Q4 (7 buys vs 8 sells) after strong buying year-to-date.
This recent shift to net selling contrasts with their position for the full year 2025, where they were strong net buyers, acquiring 47 properties while selling only 18. Interestingly, institutional investors were net buyers in Q4, acquiring 3 properties and selling 1.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 4.3% of all Q4 transactions, accounting for 7 deals.
A massive price gap exists between tiers: single-property buyers paid an average of $723,520, while institutional investors paid just $91,122. Institutions sourced more deals from other landlords (66.7%) compared to new entrants (33.3%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 999 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 69.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a total of 999 single-family residential properties in Putnam County, which constitutes 11.0% of the county's entire SFR housing stock of 9,106 homes.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly controlled by private individuals, who own 692 properties, representing 69.3% of the total investor portfolio. Companies own the remaining 314 properties (31.4%).

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at entity counts, with 903 individual landlords in the market compared to just 193 companies, a ratio of nearly 5 to 1.

A strong preference for all-cash or fully paid-off properties is evident, with 79.5% of the portfolio (794 properties) held without financing, compared to only 20.5% (205 properties) that are financed.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, as 960 properties (96.1%) are non-owner-occupied, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In a surprising reversal, landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners in Q4.
Detailed Findings

In a notable market deviation, landlords in Putnam County paid a significant 20.4% premium for properties in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $361,760 compared to $300,392 for traditional homeowners.

This $61,368 premium represents a stark reversal from earlier in the year. For instance, in Q2 2025, landlords achieved an extraordinary 67.7% discount, paying just $107,000 on average while homeowners paid $330,809.

The price dynamic has been volatile throughout 2025, with landlords also paying premiums in Q3 (9.7%) and Q1 (11.8%). This volatility suggests investors may be targeting specific, higher-value assets or competing aggressively for limited inventory.

The average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($321,992) shows a significant 54.7% increase from the 2024 average of $208,113, highlighting rapid price appreciation in the assets targeted by investors.

This trend of paying premiums defies the typical pattern of investors seeking discounts and could signal a strategic shift towards acquiring premium rental properties in desirable locations within the county.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 5.7% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, a total of 6 homes.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for 5.7% of the Putnam County market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 6 of the 106 total SFRs sold.

The quarter was marked by the entry of new investors, as 3 new single-property landlords (Tier 01) made their first acquisitions, representing half (50.0%) of all investor purchases.

Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) collectively purchased 3 properties, making up 50.0% of landlord activity and reinforcing this segment's role as a primary driver of acquisitions.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) also showed a notable presence, acquiring 2 properties, which constitutes a significant 33.3% of the quarter's landlord purchases.

The remaining 16.7% of activity came from a mid-size landlord (11-20 properties), illustrating a mix of buying activity across the investor spectrum in Q4.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate, controlling 91.4% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Putnam County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning a combined 91.4% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant group, single-handedly controlling 65.9% of the investor-owned market with 675 properties.

Despite national narratives about corporate ownership, institutional investors (Tier 09) have a negligible footprint, owning just 4 properties, which represents only 0.4% of the local investor portfolio.

Mid-size investors (11-1000 properties) collectively hold a small fraction of the market, indicating a steep drop-off in ownership share after the mom-and-pop level.

This distribution underscores a highly fragmented market structure where the vast majority of rental housing is provided by small, local investors rather than large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies take over at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure shifts dramatically as portfolio sizes increase, with individual investors dominating smaller tiers and companies controlling larger ones.

Individuals overwhelmingly own the smallest portfolios, accounting for 83.6% of single-property holdings (570 properties) and 69.3% of 3-5 property portfolios (95 properties).

The crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where company ownership surges to 89.1%, signaling a shift towards more formalized business structures for landlords managing larger portfolios.

This trend continues in higher tiers, with companies owning 81.7% of properties in the 11-20 range and 92.3% in the 101-1000 range, demonstrating a clear correlation between portfolio size and incorporation.

Even in the two-property tier, a significant portion (45.9%) is company-owned, suggesting that many investors formalize their holdings early in their expansion journey.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 46135 zip code holding 538 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Putnam County is heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with 46135 leading by a wide margin in sheer volume, containing 538 investor-owned properties.

The top five zip codes by property count (46135, 46121, 46172, 46120, and 46128) collectively account for 902 properties, representing over 90% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

While 46135 has the highest count, the zip code with the highest market penetration is 47868, where investors own 17.4% of the single-family housing stock.

Several areas show high concentrations of both count and rate, including 46135 (12.6% rate), 46172 (12.1% rate), and 46121 (11.4% rate), indicating these are core markets for rental investors.

In contrast, areas like 46120 have a significant number of investor properties (63) but a much lower ownership rate (6.2%), suggesting larger housing stocks with less investor saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords became net sellers in Q4 (7 buys vs 8 sells) after strong buying year-to-date.
Detailed Findings

A significant shift in market behavior occurred in Q4 2025, as landlords collectively became net sellers, disposing of 8 properties while acquiring only 7.

This contrasts sharply with the activity for the rest of 2025, where landlords were aggressive net buyers, accumulating a net of 29 properties (47 buys vs. 18 sells) for the full year.

The slowdown in Q4 follows a period of strong acquisition, particularly in Q3 2025 when investors bought 20 properties and sold only 3, a buy-to-sell ratio of nearly 7 to 1.

In a counter-trend, institutional investors (1000+ tier) remained net buyers in Q4, with 3 acquisitions and only 1 sale. This group has been consistently accumulating properties throughout 2025 and 2024.

The overall market trend suggests a cooling of acquisition appetite among the broader landlord community at the end of the year, while the largest players continue to expand their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 4.3% of all Q4 transactions, accounting for 7 deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in 4.3% of all SFR transactions in Putnam County during Q4 2025, with a total of 7 acquisitions recorded across different investor tiers.

A dramatic pricing disparity was evident between the smallest and largest investors. Single-property buyers (Tier 01) paid an average of $723,520, suggesting acquisitions of premium or unique properties.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired properties at an average price of just $91,122, an 87.4% discount compared to the single-property tier, indicating a strategy focused on lower-cost assets.

Both mom-and-pop and institutional investors were equally active in Q4, each making 3 transactions, but their strategies and target assets were vastly different.

Institutional investors appear more integrated into the investor network, sourcing two-thirds (66.7%) of their Q4 acquisitions from other landlords, while new single-property buyers sourced only one-third (33.3%) from existing investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pops Dominate Putnam County with 91.4% Ownership as Landlords Pivot to Net Sellers in Q4
Holdings
Landlords own 999 SFR properties, representing 11.0% of the market in Putnam County. Ownership is led by individual investors holding 692 properties (69.3%), while companies own the remaining 314 (31.4%).
Pricing
In a surprising market reversal, landlords paid 20.4% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average purchase price of $361,760 compared to $300,392.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity accounted for 5.7% of all Q4 sales (6 properties), a quarter that also saw 3 new single-property landlords enter the Putnam County market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale owners, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 91.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors own just 0.4%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but a strategic shift occurs in portfolios of 6-10 properties, where companies become the dominant owners, controlling 89.1% of homes in that tier.
Transactions
Landlords shifted to become net sellers in Q4 2025 (7 buys vs. 8 sells), a notable reversal from their net buyer position earlier in the year. In contrast, institutional investors remained net buyers, acquiring 3 properties while selling only 1.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned housing market in Putnam County is fundamentally shaped by small, local players. Landlords own 999 properties, 11.0% of the county's SFR stock, with a commanding 91.4% of this portfolio held by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties). Individual owners (69.3%) far outnumber companies (31.4%), and institutional firms have a negligible 0.4% footprint. This highly fragmented structure underscores a market built on grassroots investment rather than large-scale corporate ownership.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 revealed complex and diverging strategies. While overall acquisition volume was modest at 5.7% of market sales, pricing was anomalous: landlords paid a 20.4% premium over homeowners, reversing a trend of seeking discounts. A massive price gap emerged between new mom-and-pop buyers, who paid an average of $723,520, and institutional buyers, who paid just $91,122. Concurrently, the broader landlord market pivoted to become net sellers for the first time in 2025, even as institutional players continued to be net buyers.

The key takeaway for the Putnam County market is its clear bifurcation. The dominant small-investor segment appears to be cooling its acquisition pace, potentially facing price pressures that led them to pay high premiums for select properties before pausing. Meanwhile, a small contingent of institutional investors is operating with a completely different playbook, strategically acquiring low-cost assets and continuing to expand. This dynamic suggests that while the market's foundation remains with local landlords, the most sophisticated players are finding value and growing, even as the broader market shows signs of a slowdown.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 09:10 AM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Putnam (IN)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Putnam (IN) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-in-putnam/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.