Saline (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Saline (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Saline (KS)
17,692
Total Investors in Saline (KS)
2,988
Investor Owned SFR in Saline (KS)
3,909(22.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,500
SFR Owned
2,408
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
488
SFR Owned
1,531
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,909 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small landlords dominate 75.5% of Saline County's rental market as investors pay massive premiums in Q4.
Investors own 22.1% of SFRs in Saline County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a dominant 75.5% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors purchased 7.3% of homes sold, paying a surprising 111.3% premium over homeowners, while institutional players remained on the sidelines.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,909 SFR properties in Saline County, with individuals holding 61.6%.
Cash purchases dominate landlord portfolios, outnumbering financed properties more than 4-to-1 (3,163 vs 746). An overwhelming 96.5% of investor-owned homes in the area are operated as rentals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors paid a 111.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $468,328.
The landlord pricing advantage has vanished, swinging wildly from a 60.2% discount in Q1 to a 111.3% premium in Q4. This volatility suggests highly specific, non-market rate acquisitions driven by low transaction volume.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 7.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, totaling 17 purchases.
Mom-and-pop investors drove 94.1% of landlord buying activity (16 properties). Institutional investors made a single purchase, highlighting the market's dominance by small-scale players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 75.5% of Saline County's investor-owned housing.
Single-property landlords alone own 43.0% of the rental stock. Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.3% (13 properties) of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for landlords with 11+ properties.
The crossover occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where company ownership jumps to 70.8%. In the smallest tier (1 property), individuals own a commanding 85.5% of homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity in Saline County is heavily concentrated in the 67401 zip code, holding 3,657 properties.
The highest investor penetration is in the 67442 zip code, where landlords own 43.8% of SFRs. This contrasts with the volume leader 67401, which has a lower 22.0% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers in Saline County, acquiring 28 properties while selling 24 in Q4 2025.
While landlords overall are accumulating properties, institutional investors were neutral in Q4, selling one property for every one they purchased. Transaction volume for 2025 is significantly lower than 2024, with only 98 purchases compared to 229 last year.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 8.3% of all Q4 property transactions, with 28 total purchases.
The single institutional purchase this quarter was sourced from another landlord (100%). In contrast, new single-property landlords sourced only 30.8% of their acquisitions from existing investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,909 SFR properties in Saline County, with individuals holding 61.6%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 22.1% share of the single-family residential market in Saline County, with a total portfolio of 3,909 properties.

Individual investors form the backbone of the local rental market, owning 2,408 properties (61.6%), while company-owned properties number 1,531 (39.2%).

By entity count, the dominance of small investors is even more pronounced, with 2,500 individual landlords compared to just 488 company landlords.

Cash is the predominant acquisition strategy for landlords in this market, with 3,163 properties owned outright versus only 746 that are financed. This 4.2-to-1 ratio indicates a well-capitalized investor base less reliant on leverage.

The investor portfolio is intensely focused on rental income, with 3,771 of the 3,909 properties classified as rented, a concentration of 96.5%.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors paid a 111.3% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $468,328.
Detailed Findings

In a striking departure from typical market behavior, landlords in Q4 paid an average price of $468,328, which is $246,650 (111.3%) more than the traditional homeowner price of $221,678.

The price relationship between landlords and homeowners has been extremely volatile throughout 2025. The year began with landlords securing a 60.2% discount in Q1, followed by a 34.6% premium in Q2 and an 18.5% discount in Q3, culminating in the massive Q4 premium.

This erratic pricing suggests that the low volume of investor transactions is causing significant statistical swings, likely influenced by one or two high-value, non-standard acquisitions rather than a broad market trend.

Compared to the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average acquisition price of $113,103, the Q4 average of $468,328 represents a more than four-fold increase, highlighting the anomalous nature of recent purchasing activity.

The absence of a consistent landlord discount indicates that in Saline County's current low-volume environment, investors are not systematically finding below-market deals but are instead competing at or above market rates for specific assets.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 7.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, totaling 17 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a modest 7.3% of the Q4 purchase market in Saline County, acquiring 17 of the 233 total SFRs sold.

The quarter's buying activity was overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who were responsible for 16 of the 17 investor purchases, or 94.1% of the total.

The market saw an influx of new participants, with 13 new single-property landlords entering and acquiring 9 homes, signaling continued interest from first-time investors.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) had a negligible impact on the market, making only a single purchase, which accounted for just 5.9% of landlord activity.

Buying was concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum, with single-property landlords (9 properties) and small landlords in the 6-10 property tier (7 properties) driving the entirety of mom-and-pop acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 75.5% of Saline County's investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Saline County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) controlling 75.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords are the largest segment, owning 1,785 properties, which constitutes a 43.0% share of the entire investor-owned market.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a minimal presence, with a portfolio of only 13 properties, representing just 0.3% of investor-owned housing.

The ownership structure shows a clear pyramid shape, with a broad base of small landlords and a rapid drop-off in ownership as portfolio sizes increase. Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) collectively own 24.1% of the properties.

This distribution firmly establishes that the local rental market is sustained by a diverse group of small, local investors rather than being dominated by large, corporate entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner for landlords with 11+ properties.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges in ownership structure based on portfolio size: individuals control the smaller tiers, while companies dominate the larger ones.

The critical crossover point is the 11-20 property tier. Below this threshold, individuals are the majority owners; at this tier, company ownership surges to 70.8%.

For single-property landlords, individual ownership is at its peak, accounting for 1,542 of the properties (85.5%), confirming that new and small-scale investing is primarily an individual pursuit.

The 6-10 property tier represents a perfect equilibrium, with ownership split exactly 50/50 between individuals and companies, marking the final stage before corporate structures become the norm.

This trend suggests a natural business lifecycle for investors in Saline County, where they begin as individuals and incorporate as their portfolios grow in scale and complexity.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity in Saline County is heavily concentrated in the 67401 zip code, holding 3,657 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Saline County is hyper-concentrated, with the 67401 zip code alone accounting for 3,657 properties, or 93.6% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county.

A clear distinction exists between the regions with the highest property count and those with the highest ownership rate. While 67401 dominates by volume, its investor ownership rate is 22.0%.

Smaller, more rural zip codes exhibit the highest market penetration. The 67442 zip code leads with a 43.8% investor ownership rate, followed by 67425 at 33.6%, indicating a strategy of market dominance in less dense areas.

This geographic data reveals two different investor approaches operating simultaneously: a strategy of scale centered on the main population hub (67401) and a strategy of high concentration in surrounding, smaller communities.

The overwhelming focus on 67401 makes it the core of Saline County's rental market, with all other zip codes acting as smaller, secondary markets for investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain net buyers in Saline County, acquiring 28 properties while selling 24 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Despite a market slowdown, landlords in Saline County continue to be net accumulators of property, ending Q4 2025 with a net gain of 4 properties (28 buys vs. 24 sells).

This extends the trend for the full year 2025, during which landlords have been net buyers by a total of 20 properties (98 buys vs. 78 sells).

In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) demonstrated a neutral position in Q4, with their activity balanced at one purchase and one sale. This cautious stance follows their net seller position in 2024, suggesting a pause or end to their expansion in the area.

Overall market activity has cooled significantly compared to the previous year. The 98 properties purchased by landlords in 2025 represent a 57.2% decrease from the 229 properties they acquired in 2024.

A brief period of net selling occurred in Q2 2025 (20 buys vs. 22 sells), but the market quickly returned to a net buying position, indicating underlying resilience among local and regional investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 8.3% of all Q4 property transactions, with 28 total purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords participated in 8.3% of all SFR transactions in Saline County, making 28 purchases out of a total of 338 market-wide transactions.

A clear difference in acquisition strategy is visible between investor tiers. The one institutional purchase was a landlord-to-landlord transaction, indicating a preference for curated or off-market deals.

Conversely, new landlords (Tier 1) primarily acquired properties from the open market, with only 30.8% of their 13 purchases coming from other landlords.

Transaction activity was heavily concentrated among the smallest investors. Single-property landlords and small landlords (6-10 properties) each made 13 purchases, collectively accounting for 92.9% of all landlord transactions.

The exceptionally high average purchase price of $468,328 for single-property landlords suggests that a few high-value acquisitions by new entrants skewed the entire quarter's pricing data for investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small landlords dominate 75.5% of Saline County's rental market as investors pay massive premiums in Q4.
Holdings
Investors own 3,909 single-family properties in Saline County, Kansas, representing 22.1% of the total market. Individual investors hold the majority with 2,408 properties (61.6%), compared to 1,531 (39.2%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In a stark reversal of typical trends, investors paid a 111.3% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $468,328 versus the homeowner average of $221,678.
Activity
Investor purchasing activity accounted for 7.3% of all Q4 sales (17 properties), with activity almost entirely driven by small investors. The market welcomed 13 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Market Share
The local rental market is overwhelmingly controlled by small-scale operators, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 75.5% of all investor-held SFRs. Institutional investors have a minimal presence, controlling just 0.3%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the backbone of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11-20 properties and larger, indicating a shift to corporate structures as landlords scale.
Transactions
Landlords remained net buyers in Q4 with 28 purchases versus 24 sales. In contrast, institutional investors were neutral, acquiring one property and selling one, signaling a pause in expansion.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Saline County, Kansas is fundamentally a local, small-investor ecosystem. Landlords own 3,909 properties, a significant 22.1% of the total SFR market. This portfolio is dominated by mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) who control 75.5% of investor-owned homes, while large-scale institutional investors have a negligible footprint of just 0.3%. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals (61.6%), reinforcing the community-based nature of the rental market.

In Q4 2025, investor behavior was characterized by low-volume, high-priced acquisitions. Landlords purchased 7.3% of homes sold, but did so at a startling 111.3% premium over traditional homeowners—an anomaly likely driven by a few specific, high-value deals from new market entrants. While the broader group of landlords continued to be net buyers, institutional players were neutral, acquiring and selling one property each, signaling a halt to any large-scale accumulation strategy in the area.

The key takeaway for the Saline County housing market is its stability and insulation from national institutional trends. The market's health is dictated by the actions of thousands of small, local landlords, not a handful of large corporations. The dramatic Q4 pricing premium should be viewed as a statistical outlier caused by low transaction counts rather than a fundamental shift in market dynamics. The defining characteristic of this market remains its deep reliance on and control by mom-and-pop operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 06:19 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Saline (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Saline (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-saline/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.