Leavenworth (KS) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Leavenworth (KS) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Leavenworth (KS)
21,169
Total Investors in Leavenworth (KS)
3,117
Investor Owned SFR in Leavenworth (KS)
3,284(15.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,710
SFR Owned
2,259
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
407
SFR Owned
1,050
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,284 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Leavenworth's 3,284 Investor Homes as Institutions Begin to Divest
Investors own 15.5% of Single-Family Residential properties in Leavenworth County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 81.1% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 9.9% of all homes sold, paying just 0.6% below homeowner prices, while institutional investors, who own just 1.9% of the rental stock, became net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,284 SFR properties in Leavenworth, with individuals holding a 68.8% majority share.
Of the investor portfolio, 2,031 properties are owned outright (cash), compared to 1,253 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on rentals, with 3,149 properties (95.9%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid just 0.6% less than homeowners in Q4, an average discount of only $2,150 per property.
The minimal Q4 landlord discount ($351,812 vs $353,962) marks a sharp reversal from Q3, when landlords paid a 7.3% premium. It also represents a much smaller advantage than the 16.0% discount they secured in Q2, indicating significant price volatility.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 9.9% of all single-family homes sold in Leavenworth County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 15 properties, or 51.7% of all landlord purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired only 2 properties, representing just 6.9% of the landlord total.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 81.1% of investor-owned homes in Leavenworth County.
This small-landlord dominance stands in stark contrast to institutional investors (1000+ properties), who own just 63 properties, representing a mere 1.9% of the investor market. Q4 transaction data shows new mom-and-pop landlords paid $438,357 on average, while institutions paid just $192,955.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control in tiers with 11 or more properties.
The crossover occurs at the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 65.0% of the homes. In contrast, individuals own 90.1% of single-property portfolios and 58.0% of 6-10 property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 66048 zip code, which holds 1,993 investor-owned properties.
While 66048 has the highest count of investor properties, the 66052 zip code has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 20.6% of its housing stock. Four of the top five zip codes by ownership rate exceed the county-wide average of 15.5%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain net buyers, but institutional investors became net sellers in Q4 2025.
Overall, landlords acquired 37 properties and sold 25 in Q4, for a net gain of 12. However, institutional investors diverged from this trend, selling 5 properties while buying only 3, signaling a potential strategic shift or portfolio rebalancing.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 8.3% of all market transactions in Q4, acquiring 37 properties.
A stark pricing difference emerged between investor tiers, with new single-property landlords paying an average of $438,357, while institutional investors paid 56.0% less at $192,955. Large landlords (101-1000 tier) sourced 83.3% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,284 SFR properties in Leavenworth, with individuals holding a 68.8% majority share.
Detailed Findings

In Leavenworth County, investors hold a significant 3,284 single-family residential properties, representing 15.5% of the total 21,169 SFRs in the market.

The market is dominated by individual investors, who own 2,259 properties (68.8%), more than double the 1,050 properties (32.0%) held by companies. This is reflected in the landlord entity counts, where 2,710 individual landlords far outnumber the 407 company landlords.

A strong indicator of financial stability in the investor market is the preference for cash-owned properties. Investors hold 2,031 properties without financing, a 62.1% lead over the 1,253 financed properties.

The vast majority of the investor portfolio is actively used for rental income. A total of 3,149 properties are rented, which accounts for 95.9% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, signaling a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies.

The ratio of individual to company landlords stands at approximately 6.7 to 1, demonstrating that the rental market's foundation is built upon a large base of small, independent operators rather than large corporations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid just 0.6% less than homeowners in Q4, an average discount of only $2,150 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, the pricing power of landlords nearly vanished, as they paid an average of $351,812 per property, just 0.6% less than the $353,962 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a slim discount of only $2,150.

This near-parity in pricing is part of a highly volatile trend. It follows a Q3 where landlords surprisingly paid a 7.3% premium over homeowners ($421,636 vs $393,120), and a Q2 where they enjoyed a substantial 16.0% discount ($312,411 vs $372,062).

The Q4 2025 average acquisition price of $351,812 for landlords represents a significant appreciation over historical periods. It is 27.3% higher than the average price paid during the 2020-2023 pandemic-era boom ($276,445).

Comparing year over year, the average landlord acquisition price in 2025 ($361,280) is 13.3% higher than the average price in 2024 ($318,787), signaling sustained price growth in the market for investor-acquired properties.

The fluctuating premium and discount rates quarter-over-quarter suggest that landlord purchasing strategies in Leavenworth County are highly adaptive to changing market conditions, rather than being based on a consistent discount model.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 9.9% of all single-family homes sold in Leavenworth County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity accounted for 9.9% of the total market in Q4 2025, with investors purchasing 29 of the 292 SFRs sold in Leavenworth County.

The quarter saw the entrance of 12 new single-property landlords, who collectively purchased 8 homes. This group represented the most active tier of buyers, making up 27.6% of all investor acquisitions.

Small-scale landlords (1-10 properties) dominated Q4 purchasing, acquiring a combined 15 homes. This represents 51.7% of all landlord activity, reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of investor demand.

Mid-to-large size investors also showed notable activity, with the 21-50 property tier buying 5 homes (17.2%) and the 101-1000 tier buying 6 homes (20.7%).

Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties had a minimal impact, purchasing only 2 properties. Their 6.9% share of acquisitions was dwarfed by the activity from smaller, local landlords.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 81.1% of investor-owned homes in Leavenworth County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Leavenworth County is overwhelmingly dominated by small landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 2,733 homes, which is 81.1% of the entire investor-owned SFR market.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 1,745 properties. This tier alone accounts for 51.8% of all investor-owned housing, more than all other tiers combined.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a very small footprint, owning just 63 properties. Their 1.9% market share is identical to that of large landlords in the 101-1000 property tier.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) represent a smaller but still significant segment, controlling 511 properties, or 15.2% of the investor-owned stock.

Pricing strategies appear to vary dramatically by scale. Q4 transaction data reveals that new single-property landlords paid an average of $438,357, while institutional investors acquired properties for an average of $192,955, a 56.0% discount, suggesting a focus on different types of assets or acquisition channels.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate smaller portfolios, but companies assume majority control in tiers with 11 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear ownership pattern emerges across portfolio sizes in Leavenworth County: individuals form the backbone of the small-landlord market, while companies dominate the larger portfolios.

Individuals overwhelmingly control the entry-level tiers, owning 1,589 (90.1%) of single-property portfolios and 184 (71.6%) of two-property portfolios. Their majority ownership continues up to the 6-10 property tier (58.0%).

The strategic shift to corporate ownership happens decisively at the 11-20 property tier. In this category, companies own 115 properties, a 65.0% majority, marking the point where professionalization and scale begin to take over.

This trend intensifies in larger tiers. For portfolios of 21-50 properties, company ownership becomes almost absolute, with companies holding 283 properties, or 89.6% of the stock in that tier.

This data illustrates a typical investor lifecycle, where individuals initiate and grow small portfolios before either stopping or incorporating to achieve greater scale and legal protection.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated in the 66048 zip code, which holds 1,993 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The 66048 zip code is the epicenter of real estate investment in Leavenworth County, containing 1,993 investor-owned properties. This single area accounts for 60.7% of all investor-held SFRs in the county.

There is a clear distinction between the areas with the most investor properties and those with the highest investor saturation. The 66052 zip code leads the county in ownership percentage at 20.6%, followed closely by 66020 at 19.9%, indicating high rental demand in those areas.

Following the leader 66048, other key areas for investor ownership by count include 66086 (437 properties), 66043 (338 properties), and 66007 (273 properties).

The data highlights concentrated pockets of high investor activity. Four of the top five zip codes by ownership rate—66052 (20.6%), 66020 (19.9%), 66048 (19.2%), and 66086 (15.4%)—all surpass the county-wide investor ownership rate of 15.5%.

The data for zip code 66002 appears incomplete, showing 'nan' properties and preventing a full analysis of its market share or ranking.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain net buyers, but institutional investors became net sellers in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The overall investor market in Leavenworth County continued its expansion in Q4 2025, with landlords acting as net buyers. They purchased 37 properties while selling only 25, resulting in a net addition of 12 properties to their collective portfolio.

This net-buyer trend has been consistent throughout the year, with landlords adding a net 123 properties in 2025 and 151 properties in 2024, demonstrating sustained portfolio growth over the past two years.

However, a significant divergence in strategy appeared at the institutional level in the most recent quarter. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier became net sellers, divesting 5 properties while acquiring only 3.

This move by institutional players marks a sharp reversal from their behavior earlier in the year. They were net buyers in Q3 (net +2) and Q2 (net +1), and for the full year of 2025, they remain slight net buyers (net +4). The Q4 shift could indicate a new trend of divestment.

Total transaction volume for all landlords shows a slight slowdown. In 2025, landlords have bought 221 properties, down from 288 in 2024, a decrease of 23.3% in acquisition velocity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 8.3% of all market transactions in Q4, acquiring 37 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a party to 37 of the 446 total SFR transactions in Leavenworth County, capturing an 8.3% share of market activity.

New single-property landlords were the most active group, conducting 13 transactions. Their average purchase price of $438,357 was the highest among all investor tiers, suggesting they compete directly with traditional homebuyers for market-rate properties.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) demonstrated a different acquisition strategy, paying an average of only $192,955 per property. This 56.0% price difference compared to the smallest landlords indicates a focus on lower-cost assets or off-market deals.

Inter-landlord trading was a key strategy for larger investors. The 101-1000 property tier acquired 5 of its 6 properties (83.3%) from other landlords, signaling portfolio consolidation within the professional investor community.

Despite being the most active buyers, new single-property landlords rarely purchased from other investors, with only 1 of their 13 acquisitions (7.7%) coming from another landlord, indicating they primarily buy from the open market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Control 81.1% of Leavenworth's Investor Market as Institutions Begin to Divest in Q4
Holdings
Investors own 3,284 single-family properties in Leavenworth County, representing 15.5% of the market. Individual investors hold a commanding 68.8% share (2,259 properties) compared to 32.0% for companies (1,050 properties).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $351,812, a negligible 0.6% discount ($2,150) compared to traditional homeowners, indicating fierce competition for properties.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 9.9% of all Q4 home purchases, acquiring 29 properties. This activity was led by small investors, including 12 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is dominated by small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 81.1% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 1.9% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 11 properties or more, where they hold a 65.0% share.
Transactions
While landlords as a whole remained net buyers in Q4 (37 buys vs. 25 sells), institutional investors reversed course to become net sellers, divesting more properties (5) than they acquired (3).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Leavenworth County, KS is fundamentally driven by small, independent operators. Investors own 3,284 single-family homes, making up 15.5% of the county's total SFR stock. This landscape is dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control a massive 81.1% of the investor-owned portfolio. In contrast, institutional firms with over 1,000 properties have a minimal footprint, holding just 1.9% of the inventory. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals (68.8%) rather than companies (32.0%), underscoring the grassroots nature of the local rental market.

In terms of recent activity, investor behavior in Q4 2025 reveals distinct strategies based on scale. Landlords acquired 9.9% of all homes sold, with 12 new single-property investors entering the market. These small buyers competed at near-market rates, paying just 0.6% less than traditional homeowners. However, a significant trend emerged in transaction patterns: while the overall landlord community remained net buyers, institutional investors shifted to become net sellers in Q4. This divergence suggests that while small investors continue to see opportunity, the largest players may be starting to divest or rebalance their local holdings.

The key takeaway for the Leavenworth housing market is its stability and reliance on a broad base of local landlords rather than a few large corporations. This structure provides resilience but also highlights different market dynamics at play. The entry-level market sees intense competition, with new landlords paying top dollar, while sophisticated institutional players leverage scale to acquire assets at a significant discount—or, as seen recently, to exit positions. The recent institutional divestment, though small, is a critical trend to watch as it could signal a shift in sentiment from the most capitalized market participants.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

Tier Properties Category
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report Generated March 16, 2026 at 05:27 PM
Data Period Q4 2025
Geography Level County
Geography Leavenworth (KS)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Licensing & Usage Rights

This report, data, and all visual analyses are the property of BatchData © 2025 BatchService, Inc. and are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

You MAY: Download, share, or excerpt this content for personal or non-commercial purposes, provided you give clear attribution to BatchData with a link back to this original page.

You MAY NOT: Use this data commercially, resell or redistribute it as your own, or publish modified versions.

For commercial licensing: batchdata.io/contact-sales

Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this report

BatchData. (2025). Q4 2025 Leavenworth (KS) Report. BatchService, Inc. Retrieved from https://reports.batchdata.io/investorpulse-reports/2025-q4-county-ks-leavenworth/. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.